Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A&L PPI cliam or no claim?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4429 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out a loan with Alliance and Leicester in 2003 and took PPI.

However, I did this completely online, so I was totally unaware of certain things such as being able to obtain PPI from other providers, that it wouldn't cover existing illnesses, or I believ that if my employer at the time paid me full sick pay9 which they would, that they would not pay out.

 

Part way through the loan I started a DMP with CCS who advised me to cancel the PPI as it would not be valid while on the DMP. I attempted to do this but was told I couldn't unless I settle the loan with another without PPI. Obviously on a DMP this was no option at all.

 

Would I have a claim for miss selling I'm at a loss to see how online customers could claim miss selling as there is no telephone contact when taking out the loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A&L have been writing to lots of customers with PPI offering refunds.

 

yes you have a good case

 

off you go.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Laney,

 

I took out a loan with Alliance and Leicester in 2003 and took PPI.

However, I did this completely online, so I was totally unaware of certain things such as being able to obtain PPI from other providers, that it wouldn't cover existing illnesses, or I believ that if my employer at the time paid me full sick pay9 which they would, that they would not pay out.

 

Part way through the loan I started a DMP with CCS who advised me to cancel the PPI as it would not be valid while on the DMP. I attempted to do this but was told I couldn't unless I settle the loan with another without PPI. (this is not quite accurate) Obviously on a DMP this was no option at all.

 

Would I have a claim for miss selling I'm at a loss to see how online customers could claim miss selling as there is no telephone contact when taking out the loan.

 

Can I first ask do you still have copies of the original paperwork?

 

If you do not then you should start by sending a Subject Access request to A&L.

 

Template letters are here...Full SAR for ppi and here...

Data Protection Act 1998 - Subject Access Request

 

When you send the SAR you should specifically ask for these items:

 

A true copy of your Consumer Credit Agreement with the Terms and Conditions that were applicable at the time you took the loan.

 

Copies of all statements applicable to the loan.

 

Copies of all correspondence that apply to you as a data subject ie letters, emails, faxes etc.

 

Copies of all recorded telephone calls or transcripts of the recordings. (not at the point of sale in your case but since)

 

A copy of the needs and wants/ customer duty of care questionnaire... here is an example. (they will not be able to produce this for an online application so how can the be certain the product (PPI) being sold was suitable?)

 

http://wwwa.mbna.co.uk/insurance/files/CP0608_INSU_MB_LP_S.pdf

 

Copies of any notes made by any staff in their dealings with you.

 

Online banking has so many pitfalls it puts the onus onto you to tick or untick boxes etc and inevitably there is a catch to trip you up.

 

The aim here is get as much information as you can before submitting a claim to them for mis-sold PPI.

 

There are others on this forum claiming against A&L so perhaps you can post and swap notes and get help from others in the same fight with A&L.

 

A & L PPI letter....

 

alliance and leicester ppi

 

Alliance and Leicester PPI Letter

 

You are not alone against A&L

 

aa

 

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alana

 

thanks for the reply.

 

The only paperwork I have is the orignal credit agreement and the ppi agreements.

 

I would send them a Subject Access Request to ask for all your other data as mentioned above.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I'll make this as short and painless as possible.

 

Took out loan with PPI via internet.

 

I cannot remeber if I had to tick in or out for this when I did so.

At no point was I aware that PPI was available from other sources.

Nowhere in the terms and conditions did it state this either, although there was the usual cooling off period.

There was also no mention on the T&C's that I would not be eligible for payout if my employer paid full sick pay which at that time they would of.

 

Now on a DMP with CCCS who advised me to cancel due to it being no use now I was on reduced payments anyway.

Was told the only way I could do this was to refinance the loan which I was in no position to do so.

 

So my question do I have grounds to reclaim the £1700.00??

 

This was taken out in Dec 2003

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll make this as short and painless as possible.

 

Took out loan with PPI via internet.

 

I cannot remeber if I had to tick in or out for this when I did so.

At no point was I aware that PPI was available from other sources.

Nowhere in the terms and conditions did it state this either, although there was the usual cooling off period.

There was also no mention on the T&C's that I would not be eligible for payout if my employer paid full sick pay which at that time they would of.

 

Now on a DMP with CCCS who advised me to cancel due to it being no use now I was on reduced payments anyway.

Was told the only way I could do this was to refinance the loan which I was in no position to do so.

 

So my question do I have grounds to reclaim the £1700.00??

 

This was taken out in Dec 2003

 

 

Yes even on a DMP you can claim back the PPI if it is cancelled due to a DMP etc. I am in the process of doing that but have just started so can not offer conclusive advice.

 

I would say though that if you had PPI on the original Loan/Credit card/Mortgage etc and you have a case for the PPI being mis-sold then you should surely claim it back. Cancel the expensive PPI policy and get a cheaper one online but you must at all costs ensure you have coverin the eventuallity that you cannot meet the repayments.

 

The aim of the game is to get the data, prepare a claim, submit a claim, take it up a notch to the FOS or Court, wait for weeks or months and then put the money back into your account. The FOS are currently upholding 90% of claims and if you submit a complaint to the FOS it will cost the other party £500 for the FOS to deal with it :eek:

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Bit of a long shot this one I think.

 

2003 PPI on loan of 60 months (online application) There were no explanations regarding, other companies products being available, no questions relating to pre existing conditions which may effect cover etc. Also at the time I was entitled to full sick pay from my employer and now believe this would have prevented me from claiming as well.

 

Defaulted on loan and am paying via a DMP with CCCS I was advised to cancel the PPI as it would be void anyway due to DMP reduced payments.

 

I was told by A&L I could not cancel unless I refinanced the loan. Consequently I'm still paying the balance of this useless product and will be for another 5 years.

 

Is this correct? Do I have a case to a claim a refund of payments made?

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes you do have a case. Have a read of No.1 in my signature.

 

Pop along to the fos website and download a copy of their consumer questionnaire and complete it.

 

Do you have copies of the loan statements or a full record of all payments made against the loan?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the original agreeements thatas all, so I guess I need to them SAR for the payment details and statements?

 

Yes good idea

 

That should also show the payments being made through the dmp

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 threads merged

 

why did you abandon the first claim here?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...