Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Restons and MBNA and County Court Papers


booda31
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5273 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

What a great site this is. Some absoloutely priceless information.

 

I have been reading the many, many threads on Ratsons :-x and MBNA :-x. Suprise suprise I :eek: am in the same boat.

 

Before the court papers were served, MBNA had been served with s77/s78 letter, and they responded but with exactly the same as what Restons have sent now - see below.

 

Back then they said we will hold and await instruction from our client.

 

3 months pass by and I get a letter from Restons telling me to complete and sign i + e form, which I did not, and responded that the account is still in dispute/default over the s77/s78 request not being complied with.

 

They served county court papers on me on not so long ago, and I responded by sending a CPR 18 request, and a CPR 31 request using templates from this site.

 

They have responded, advising that I need to

 

"explain what part of the proceedings I am disputing, and that the CPR 18 request they do not understand its purpose" adding further that

 

"You state the information is required 'in order to file a defence and counterclaim. You provide no explanation as to why as to why you require this information listed in your correspondence and we cannot think of any justification for such a request"

 

They end threatening to apply for a summary judgment unless I accept their invitation to withdraw my defence to the claim"

 

At the top of the letter they say as requested we enclose:

 

1. A copy of the original credit agreement - this was an online application form with tick in the box

2. A copy of the latest version of the credit agreement which applied your account (actual wording)

3. Statements of account

3. A recreated copy of the Default Notice sent by our client.

 

I have emailed and written to them to advise that I will give them till x date to confirm with the CPR requests fully.

 

What would be my next step, what would go in my defence?

 

Any thoughts I'd be very grateful.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Can you post the PoC remembering to remove any personal info. I am assuming that you have not been to court yet or had an AQ sent to you.

What did you file when you acknowledged service did you say you intended to defend all?

The more info you can provide the better it helps everyone to try to advise you.

DG:)

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks diamondgirl -

 

PoC

 

The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the defendent under a contract dated on or around 06/09/2007 in the sum of £2xxx.xx inclsuive of interest to the date of this summons at 8% per annum from 18/11/2008 to 23/07/2009.

 

Particulars of claim a/c number:- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Date - 18/11/2008

Item - Default Balance £2xxx.xx

Post Refrl Cr NIL

 

23/07/2009 interest £xxx.xx

TOTAL:- £2xxx.xx

 

Together with intersest pursuant to s69 county courts act 19 at the rate of xx.xx per day to the date of judgment or sooner payment.

 

I have not been to court but have sent acknowledged service and said I intended to defend in full. Court papers were served 24/07/2009, and have given Restons until Monday 10 August to fully comply.

 

The above in my first post is all I have had from Restons.

 

Thanks

 

What is an AQ, is it the small claims book by Patricia Pearl?, I have not got that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi booda - welcome to CAG

 

You should read this thread - very pertinent to your case & it's the success of the week & you will learn a lot from it, particularly the barrister's appearance in court! ;)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/170484-fairbyblue-mbna-restons-court.html

 

Re. your defence:

1. What date does your defence have to be in by? It's 28 days from the date on the summons.

 

2. The POC is rubbish. They are not allowed to claim stat. interest

 

3. They cannot just ignore CPR requests - you can get the court to order production of the docs.

 

4. Have you ever had any charges applied to your account & if so have you ever reclaimed them?

 

5. Have you received a DN at all? Can you post up what they have sent as a copy please (minus personal details)

 

6. Can you also post up your agreement (minus the personal bits)?

 

You will get lots of help but the info is necessary to help compile a defence.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet the uploads are useless looking very small, how do I get bigger size uploaded, do I need to upload 1 per post or something?

 

My defence needs to be in by Tuesday, but am unsure how to proceed further.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link foolish girl, I think the embarrased defence is the next step considering I can not put in a defence if they refuse information under CPR.

Their default notice looks very strange to say the least, I see the bankers themselves are into the business of crossing there signature with 2 lines - lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry booda, the images are too small. Did you upload using photobucket?

 

Yes, the embarassed defence is the way to go. If you can post up a draft, it will give CAGers opportunity to comment.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never heard of photobucket till now, thanks for that, that will free up loads of space on my hardrive, and so easy to email photos and all..... going off topic.

 

I hope the following link helps, it is all that has been provided by Restons under the CPR, and its the same as what MBNA sent under s77/s78 many months ago which I disputed - untrue copies.

 

 

Pictures by booda31 - Photobucket

 

The embarrassment defence I have used a template chrisroach I think his screen name is, posted on the link you provided.

 

Thanks again, I am well happy about photobucket - lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post the defence you are using here please?

 

The CCA looks OK so far booda, so if you wish to challenge their claim suggest you do so on the DN:-

 

1. They have to prove date of posting to show they have given you the full 14 days before arrears payment is due.

 

2. If you had any charges on this account & it is not taken into account when demanding the arrears, the DN is defective as it does not show an accurate figure.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again,

 

Defence

 

 

I Booda31 make this statement as my defence to the claim brought by MBNA.

 

1. The claimants particulars of claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR

 

2. No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered which the defendant needs to establish what agreement it is that this action is based upon.

 

3. Without clarification of the claimants claim, the defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the claimants claim appears without merit.

 

4. Further to above the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed.

Have not sent it yet, but I need to get something in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a tad brief booda & not quite accurate - you have had an agreement etc. from them. It would therefore possibly be struck out.

 

Suggest the following (amend as necessary)

 

1. I xxxx of xxxx am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as my defence to the claim made by xxxxx

 

2. Except where otherwise mentioned in this defence, the defendant neither admits nor denies any allegation made in the claimant's Particulars of Claim and puts the claimant to strict proof thereof.

 

3. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

4. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters:

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due, or any default notices issued required for the claimant to have a legitimate right of action for the purported debt or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim;

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form; and

 

c) A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged accounts, has not been served attached to the claim form.

5. In respect of that which is denied, on xxxxx I requested that the claimant provide a true copy of the agreement to which they refer, the default notice & copies of statements under the Civil Procedure Rules to enable a proper defence to be submitted. To date I have received a copy of the credit agreement, a reconstructed default notice & some statements of account.

 

6. The defendant disputes the sum claimed.

 

7. The defendant also requests that the claimant produce material evidence as to the service on the defendant of any alleged default notice.

 

8. The claim relates to a regulated credit agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, yet the claimant claims statutory interest which the claimant should surely know it is not entitled to by virtue of the County Courts (Interest on Judgment Debts) Order 1991 (No. 1184 (L. 12)) in particular section 2 (3) which expressly prohibits such an award.

 

9. Consequently, I deny all allegations on the particulars of claim and do not know what case I have to meet.

 

 

Don't forget to head it correctly with Case No. etc & sign a statement of truth at the bottom.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also suggest that if you have all your statements, you work out how much you are owed in charges etc, add the interest (you can charge contractural, also adding on the stat. 8% ;) ) & submit that as a counterclaim at the same time as you submit your defence.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Restons have 28 days from when the defence has been submitted to decide their next move.

 

If they do not do anything, the claim would be stayed but could be resurrected by Restons on paying the neccessary Court Fees.

 

I am sure you've read plenty of threads featuring these solicitors and you'll know what their next step is. ;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just to make you aware, Restons leave everything to the last minute, don't get a false sense of security when 20 seconds before a deadline you have heard nothing, rest assured it will be following in the next 19 seconds.

 

Good luck with your defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And today I have the first reponse from Northampton CC.

Its headed "Notice that a Defence has been filed"

And it comes with the famous 'aq'

 

Its being moved to my local small claims track.

I really am unsure how to proceed, I did not put a counter claim in against Ratsons/MBNA with my defence.

 

It needs to be in by 22 September 09, am confused over the fees bit aswell, my case is over £1500.00, but am on JSA income based with 2 little toddlers and wife to support?

 

Any advice would be gratefully accepted/

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

And today I have the first reponse from Northampton CC.

Its headed "Notice that a Defence has been filed"

And it comes with the famous 'aq'

 

Its being moved to my local small claims track.

I really am unsure how to proceed, I did not put a counter claim in against Ratsons/MBNA with my defence.

 

The AQ needs to be completed & sent with draft directions that request an order be made for docs that you require to be produced to the court. I'll try & post up something for you later

Did you send a CPR request to Restons at all?

It needs to be in by 22 September 09, am confused over the fees bit aswell, my case is over £1500.00, but am on JSA income based with 2 little toddlers and wife to support?

 

You should be able to claim fees etc. - you just apply. I'll post the link when I find it.

 

 

FG

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again FG.

 

I sent both cpr18 and cpr31.14, to which there response was along the lines of "you are just trying to waste time, please remove defence or will apply for summary judgment".

 

They did supply copies of CCA with tick in box, t+c's as they are now, copy statements and a reconstructed dn.

 

I will post the defence I used in the next post, and that brings me to where I am at now, aq stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...