Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debit Card Loans/Chequebook Loans Ltd claimform - PDL **STRUCKOUT + £200 costs**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5165 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Has anyone else had issues with the above company?

 

 

I took out a loan months ago which I then couldn't afford to pay back.

They have sent a few letters then I fought back with a CCA request.

 

 

Since then Barclays have sent me two letters about 2 months apart saying this company have tried to set up standing orders on my account for £200 per month until further notice.

 

 

I remember signing a standing order mandate but they have obviously photocopied it and filled in their own details, cheek!

 

I have reported them to the FOS for doing this previously but I have still heard nothing.

 

Has anyone else had any issues with the above company or have any advice on what I should do?

 

I am panicking incase they set up an SO and it goes through.....

 

Thanks

 

S4ddy

PLEASE HELP TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING Every pound donated to this site helps us to keep on helping others. Click Here to Donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

No easy way of stopping them other than to be constantly checking. They would be in the wrong but difficult to argue that when they have your money.

 

I would certainly write to them asking them to stop. I would also be wary of leaving any sizable sums in your account. If you have salary going in be extra vigilant!

 

A new bank account would be handy! Or tell current bank that your details have been compromised and ask for new account number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hiya,

 

Still waiting on a reply from the FO, but they have tried to do it again twice since. Luckily I bank with Barclays who send me the mandate asking if it is legit. Would suggest going into your bank and changing your details.

 

Will let you know outcome when I get something back.

 

My opinion is that it is illegal and would be interested to hear a solicitors view on it, if you tried to set up a standing order on someone elses account with a photocopied document for a random amount which has never been agreed im sure this amounts to fraud / theft, im sure the police would also be interested.......

 

Oh, and I have also sent the story to BBC Watchdog, so report it to them, the more people that do the more chance of getting heard!

PLEASE HELP TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING Every pound donated to this site helps us to keep on helping others. Click Here to Donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya - getting more and more stressful dealing with these companies here and no let up in sight. Apparently they can claim on card details that they have (even if cancelled!!) and any cheques that you issue with guarantee cards can also go through! Cancelling the account and moving your banking wholesale elsewhere does not even do it!! The banking system working for the customer! (bear in mind I am trying to communicate with firms and advise them that in difficulty and would like to agree repayment plans). Trying to talk to them or email does not help - an absolute disaster in every sense of the word. I rue the time I ever decided to use any one of them! Do we have no rights with these firms??? (sorry but very stressed at present :mad:) !

MJC 007.5 :cool:

 

Advice or opinions offered by mjc 007.5 are personal, offered in good faith and without prejudice or liability. Your decisions and actions are your own and should you be in any doubt then please seek the opinion of a fully qualified and insured professional

 

:) If you think I have helped you please feel free to click on my scales :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you cancelled your card did you say that the payment was not authorised?

I did this and also put it in writing to my bank and said that if any payment went to the companies that I had listed I would hold them responible as they had been notified by phone and by letter.

 

Surely the card would be shown as cancelled when they try to put payment through?

 

Also, whatever payment arrangements are made with these companies get it in writing!

 

bub1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Bub going to try what you have suggested and give them a list. However they say these are "continuous authorities" and as such "may get paid" even on a cancelled card. Croc of ****!

 

It is getting me down now but I am mindful of this being the idea so the unreasonable ones out there will not win! :(

 

In respect to the OP (sorry if this has drifted off topic a bit) - what they have done to you sounds illegal but given my experience with cards etc not so sure. All you can do is proceed as Bub suggests for now (in addition to what you have already done)

- would certainly second that a new account for salary is likely in order (worst case then the original bank runs up a debt paying your debt to these people when advised not to and you can slug it out with them!).

 

 

Unscrupulous the whole lot of them! Fine whilst you are paying (perpetually in debt and "extending") rubbish when you either cannot or want to come to an arrangement to pay them off!

MJC 007.5 :cool:

 

Advice or opinions offered by mjc 007.5 are personal, offered in good faith and without prejudice or liability. Your decisions and actions are your own and should you be in any doubt then please seek the opinion of a fully qualified and insured professional

 

:) If you think I have helped you please feel free to click on my scales :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Hi All,

 

Has anyone else had issues with the above company? I took out a loan months ago which I then couldn't afford to pay back. They have sent a few letters then I fought back with a CCA request. Since then Barclays have sent me two letters about 2 months apart saying this company have tried to set up standing orders on my account for £200 per month until further notice. I remember signing a standing order mandate but they have obviously photocopied it and filled in their own details, cheek!

 

I have reported them to the FO for doing this previously but I have still heard nothing.

 

Has anyone else had any issues with the above company or have any advice on what I should do?

 

I am panicking incase they set up an SO and it goes through.....

 

Thanks

 

S4ddy

 

 

Hi - just been reading this because the same has happened to me however it looks like they got away with £300. I queried this unauthorised standing order on the day it was debited - Barclays say it was taken into a branch with my signature for this past Friday. The money went out the same day as it was set up.

I am really doubtful that I will get this refunded, I already had an arrangement with this company via the CCCs to make affordable payments yet it seems that anyone can get your money by a fraudulent standing order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

Just require some advice if possible as im a little bit worried.

 

I took out a payday loan with Debit card loans on the 21st August 2008 and agreed to pay them back on the 15th September. I defaulted on the repayment and since then have struggled to make a payment to them.

 

After receiving a couple of letters from them, I wrote to them on the 17th February 2009 with a CCA request to which they did not reply and complaining at the fact they had tried to set up fraudulent standing orders on my current account without my knowledge. I also wrote to the Financial Ombudsman to inform them of my disgust and the standing order fraud.

 

They wrote back to on 8th July threatening me with court action, to which I replied on the 14th July telling them the account was in dispute so they could not take me to court.

 

I also stated that I had submitted an official complaint to the FO who were investigating. I have received confirmation from the FO they have received my complaint and would be investigating as they had previously written to DCL asking them to respond to me (to which they have not done), but as im sure you all know, these things take time.

 

This morning I recieved a summons from Northampton County Court with DCL claiming £488.00 plus £35.00 court fees. The original loan was for £160.00

 

I didn't think they could do this as they had not responded to my CCA request or replied to the FO.

 

I am worried now thinking the courts will rule in their favour and I will be CCJ'ed for over £500.00 for a £160.00 loan.

 

I can prove I have sent all correspondence, as the FO have copies of everything, was just wondering:

 

What people think I should put in my court defence when I file it???

 

and ,if they are allowed to take me to court even though the account is in dispute??

 

Also would it make any difference that I am waiting for the FO to investigate my complaint??

 

Urgent help would be really appreciated as I have a time limit to submit my defence.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

S4ddy

PLEASE HELP TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING Every pound donated to this site helps us to keep on helping others. Click Here to Donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, complete the Acknowledgment of Service on line and state you will defend all of the claim. This will add another 14 days to the time limit to file your defence, so giving us longer to see what we can do.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ist time ive known it to

 

while in dispute ref failing to respond to your cca request in the allocated time limit as they are not allowed enforcement while the dispute continues,

 

thats a defence in its self

 

i saw off mortimer clark sols in court on that one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

First time I have heard of any of these firms going to court as well! I suppose had to happen some time, sorry this is happening to you. As already said on here combination of excellent site team and already flawed actions by them in attempting to enforce whilst not responding to a CCA request should enable you to see this off.

 

If they have definetly not responded to your CCA request or acknowledged that you have various complaints pending then can only be the court action can only have been filed in a fit of pique (or stupidity) because you have challenged them? :p. As well as defence posted by postggj (I have pointed this out when threatened with court action by one of these firms and suddenly agreement reached instantly to pay in instalements only what was actually loaned!) then there would also be the contract itself (not just prescribed terms but unfair terms given interest rate etc).

 

Best of luck, keep folk posted

MJC 007.5 :cool:

 

Advice or opinions offered by mjc 007.5 are personal, offered in good faith and without prejudice or liability. Your decisions and actions are your own and should you be in any doubt then please seek the opinion of a fully qualified and insured professional

 

:) If you think I have helped you please feel free to click on my scales :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir,

 

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

CPR 31.14 Request

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) County Court.

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

[Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request was ignored][delete if no such request was delivered]

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 the assignment*

 

3 the default notice*

 

4 the termination notice*

 

5 [any other documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim]*

 

* delete if not mentioned in the Particulars of claim.

 

[Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise]#

 

# delete if claim for a sum exceeding £5,000.00

 

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

yours faithfully

 

 

OK

 

NOW SEND BY RECORDED TO DEBIT CARD LOANS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks, have just sent it recorded delivery. What do I do if they come back with a signed copy of the agreement now, even though I requested it in February?

PLEASE HELP TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING Every pound donated to this site helps us to keep on helping others. Click Here to Donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...