Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good morning all,   I have an update for you all, shortly after my first hearing i was told i would need to have a rehearing with another company, Obviously i agreed but after the initial grievance hearing the person then asked me to enter into a private conversation, I have received the settlement offer and are disgusted as its not even half of my monthly  salary, I'm not sure what to do at this stage as i dont have the funds to finance a solicitor,so any advice would be appreciated.  
    • Sorry, but what does this mean?   Who are ARC? It would be helpful if you could be a little bit more clear about what happened. I don't understand why you are not simply proceeding against Amazon – because it is clearly their responsibility as it was their driver or courier company
    • I understand that you were involved in a contentious divorce in respect of which there was a bill for court costs – £850. You decided to challenge the costs in court and you lost and an order was made against you. We decided to appeal the order but before the appeal was heard, the solicitors made you a without prejudice offer of a 50-50 split – £425. You agree to this and you signed the document to that effect which you returned to the solicitors. Despite that the solicitors are now trying to impose the original £850 order. Is that the correct order of events? "Without prejudice" is certainly something that doesn't seem to be very well understood, including by solicitors. "Without prejudice" can protect an offer from being disclosed to the court where the offer has been refused so that it is not binding on anyone. However, without prejudice cannot be used to hide everything from the court – including wrongdoings, unethical behaviour et cetera. It seems to me that once you sign the agreement you effectively had a contract. I'd like to know a little bit more about the agreement that you signed but presumably it was intended to bring a halt to any further proceedings. I don't think there is any difficulty about disclosing a contract to the court in the circumstances. It is only the offer which was made without prejudice. Once the agreement was accepted and signed then the document acquired a wholly different character. It was no longer an offer open to be accepted or refused. It was a legally binding contract which imposed obligations upon both sides. In my view the solicitors have acted in a highly unethical way and I would begin by making a complaint to the SRA. I wonder whether the solicitors proposed the 50-50 split to you without consulting with their client and when they then contacted their client and told her what had been agreed, she refused to accept it and on that basis the solicitors recognised that they had made an error but rather than accept their responsibility and footing the £425 out of their own pockets, they preferred to get it from you. Of course this is just speculation but it seems to me to be quite a possible scenario. I'd like to see the agreement post up here please – that my sense is that you should complain to the SRA and you should tell the solicitors that this is what you're doing.
    • What's the default date? It should be on your Credit File
    • i point you to two threads whereby you'll see an explanation by andy (post 22 here) https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/410486-lowell-interim-charging-order-from-credit-card-debt-2009/?tab=comments#comment-4912902   and   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406428-remortgage-issue/   if yours says:    written notice of the disposition was given to XX Council ( - disposition = sold vis: disposed of) ..... notice means letter telling them it's been sold -    doesn't say it must be paid or settled BEFORE disposition..   that's the way i read it.          
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
13thapostle

VT Trouble with Welcome

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3794 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi guys and girls.

 

This is my first post on here after searching google, A LOT about the problem I'm having with Welcome and the car HP agreement with them.

 

Brief History

 

I got a car back in March 2007 and Welcome provided the finance via an HP agreement, and I also took the mechanical breakdown insurance as well. I took the agreement out over 4 years paying £177.49 per month.

 

I checked my agreement and after 2 years I could VT the car providing I had met the termination figure on the agreement of £4049.84.

 

So on the 27th April this year, after I had made 2 years worth of payment, I sent them my termination letter. That's when the fun started. After finally getting the termination request to the correct department, I then received a letter stating that I owed them £700 to terminate as I had not yet reached the termination figure, and I still owed 2 years worth of the mechanical breakdown insurance.

 

I queried the letter saying I had made 2 years worth of payment which amounted to the termination figure as stated on the signed agreement. I was then told that the termination figure is based on the repayments made against the car, and my monthly payment of £177.49 represents repayment of the car and insurance, and only 90% of that monthly figure is goods, the other 10% is for the insurance.

 

This is where the real argument started. The agreement clearly states that once half the TOTAL amount payable has been paid, which is £4049, then I can return the car. I does not state anywhere about payment for goods only.

Also the agreement, or any paperwork I have for that matter, does not show any breakdown of what the monthly repayment is made up of. i.e how much I am paying back for the goods, and how much I am paying back for the insurance.

 

In May I passed these details on to a solicitor to take up, and first off they said the letter Welcome sent me regarding the termination didn't show the deposit I had made at the start of the agreement or the proceeds they would get back from selling the car. But they sent off a SAR to Welcome with the required £10 fee to get all the paperwork they have on me to look at it properly. It has now been over 40 days, the legal time required to respond to a SAR, and Welcome still haven't forwarded the information to the Solicitors, and they are not contactable by phone either.

 

I am still paying each month for a car that I no longer use, in fact I have made another 3 payments on the car since sending my termination request, as I don't want to just stop the DD's and get defaulted on my credit file.

 

I really don't know what to do now, but it's getting beyond a joke. How can a company state 1 thing on their agreements, which is in effect a contract, then say something different, which amounts to a breach of contract??

 

Please help. I will put the links up to the agreement as well.

 

Sorry for warbling on, and thank you to anyone who has taken the time to read my thread and offer some much needed help.

 

 

http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg195/ctaylor3_2007/Figures.png

 

http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg195/ctaylor3_2007/Agreement.png

 

http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg195/ctaylor3_2007/TC.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well welcome [sic] along to the forum dedicated to the worst credit company in history - welcome finance.

 

my first advice is to read as many of the threads in this forum as you can, the more you read the stronger you will become & the more knowledgable upon how to deal with these rip-off cretins.

 

you'll work out what to do next from reading other peoples experiances.

 

i'd also seriously consider reclaiming the ppi as i bet you were told you had to have it or no hp?

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 13thapostle

 

As dx100uk says, reclaim PPI/charges etc. - that will seriously reduce the debt.

 

It does state in 9.2 of your third doc post about payment of goods being the key to VT. However, I think thats a moot point as the agreement clearly states a VT figure on doc post 2. As far as you are concerned you are paying for the total credit, how they apportion that credit is up to them, not your concern.

 

Just to get the ball rolling, I'd suggest sendin a CCA request:

 

Welcome Financial Services Compliance

Ruddington Fields Business Park

Ruddington

Nottingham

NG11 6NZ

 

 

27 July 2009

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− Account/Reference Number xxxxxxxxxx

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77(6) will apply.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

You may also want to send a SAR (£10 and takes upto 40 days) - more power to your argument!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

try this

 

call welcome and ask again about the vt and debt still owing. if they say the same crap, ask them to send it in writing or even better, do you have it in writing.

 

now back to the agreement.

they are talking rollocks

 

once the termination figure has been reached, thats it, game over, welcome cant to sfa.

the termination figure and ppi are two seperate finance agreements on the credit agreement if that makes sense.

you are still paying full apr on the total ammount of credit, thats car finance and ppi

 

the ppi has its own seperate apr

 

if you need help drafting a letter to these cretins let me know

 

more than happy to help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone and thanks for your replies.

 

The solicitor has already sent off the SAR request to get the paperwork from them, but they have not responded with the 40 days, but have banked the cheque of £10.

 

I called the solicitor yesterday to express my concern at the lack of movement on my case, to which she replied that they have sent numerous letters and faxes that have gone unanswered, and attempted phone have not been answered. All this is to the head office at Ruddington, which is where I sent in my initial VT letter.

 

I was told that was the wrong place to send it, as it should be my local branch that handles this as the 1st point of contact.

 

Any how, the solicitor decided to try and get through to the local branch, which eventually she did, and the person she spoke to there knew nothing of the communications between the 2 parties. Typical! The solicitor then requested the fax number to send a copy of all the documentation sent thus far, to which the local branch replied they were sorry but the fax machine is broken, you will have to send them in via post.

 

So I've now got to wait another week or 2, which starts getting nearer if not past another payment date. So thats more money they will have off me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ruddington is the highest you can go

its compliance

 

local branch to deal with it

 

its rollocks

 

your solicitor should no better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ruddington is the highest you can go

its compliance

 

local branch to deal with it

 

its rollocks

 

your solicitor should no better

 

Well that seems to be Welcome all over. I sent my VT letter in to Welcome at Ruddington, asking for details on when they would like to come and collect the vehicle. The response I got back....a statement of account. When I called to question what they sent me, I got the same response. You need to send your request to your local branch, who will then communicate the request up the chain to the VT department.

 

Utter rubbish.

 

We'll see what happens with this girl at my local branch now she has a letter and all the paperwork from my solicitor. It doesn't change the fact I'm still paying them each month though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim It Back

 

The Vt Should Take No More Than 14 Days From Initial Request

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Claim It Back

 

The Vt Should Take No More Than 14 Days From Initial Request

 

I know, but this is my whole concern and argument with them. They claimed I still owed them money at the time of VT request because the VT figure is based on repayment of goods, when it clearly states on the agreement that it is half the total amount paid.

 

I will never deal with these low life, **** again. It's an absolute pain in the a**.

 

Can I claim back my over payments since the VT request?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as soon as you have paid back half, thats on the agreement under your termination right, thats it

 

 

do as ive advised

 

send a letter by recorded

 

tell them to collect the vehicle within 14 days and confirm vt or you will start charging 20 quid a day storage charges and receipt of this letter confirms the agreement unless you get written notification to the contary

 

and you will seek legal redress through the county court

 

cretins

 

they realy do think they are above the law

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
as soon as you have paid back half, thats on the agreement under your termination right, thats it

 

 

do as ive advised

 

send a letter by recorded

 

tell them to collect the vehicle within 14 days and confirm vt or you will start charging 20 quid a day storage charges and receipt of this letter confirms the agreement unless you get written notification to the contary

 

and you will seek legal redress through the county court

 

cretins

 

they realy do think they are above the law

 

I'm gonna give it till next week to see if the local branch will reply to my solicitor, if they don't, then I will be sending the letter myself or instructing the solicitor to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well it's been quite some time since my last post. Nearly 10 months. Here's what's been going on with my Welcome Finance sage.

 

The case was taken up by Stephenson's solicitors in June last year, and they spent month after month trying to get Welcome to respond to anything they were doing. Welcome used the usual excuses of fax machine not working, local branch has been closed down, with out any notice to me or the solicitors of the branch where my account was then held. I even found out that a manager at Welcome had cancelled my original VT request, and not left any reasons or explanations on the system as to why. They just cancelled it.

 

After muuuuuuuuch waiting and paperwork being sent, I was advised to forward the case to the FOS by my solicitor. Funnily enough, as soon as the FOS contacted Welcome, I received a final offer from them saying I could give my car back at no cost, but the were keeping my overpayments to clear off the liability they claimed I owed. Errrrm computer says no!

 

So I called them at the beginning of December to dispute this offer, and seek reassurances that the negative marks on my credit file that have been put on while this dispute was ongoing were removed, and that I wanted my overpayments back, which totalled £700+ before they got the car. I was advised this would be investigated and then I would get a call back with the results. Funnily I never heard from them, so I carried on with the FOS route. I sent them copies of all the paperwork that I had, and that the solicitor had sent Welcome.

 

That was December, I got a call from the FOS this week, from one of the adjudicators that is now dealing with my case, and guess what......the FOS are still waiting for the paperwork requested from Welcome :lol: They've given them 2 weeks to respond and then it goes to decision stage based off the evidence submitted.

 

Oh and the car is still sat on my drive, in the same place it's been since May last year waiting for this to be solved. Patience is a virtue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well what can i say

 

welcome playing three wise monkies again

 

seems it will soon be over now

 

just wait for the fos to do its decision

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
well what can i say

 

welcome playing three wise monkies again

 

seems it will soon be over now

 

just wait for the fos to do its decision

 

lol Good comment. I like it.

 

All I wanted from the start was to VT my car, they didn't want me to do that. Now all I want is to give them the car back, and get my £700 overpayments back, and my credit file cleared up. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

Lets see what happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the fos will award 200 quid comp as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the fos will award 200 quid comp as well

 

If they do, then that's a bonus. I'm not out to screw any body, I just want the car gone and my money back.

 

I suspect if Welcome do come up with the paperwork, it'll be right on the last minute as usual.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...