Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How much of the documentation have you seen from when probate was obtained? And do you have a copy of the original will? I can't remember. My thought about you making the decision on your own to go with another lawyer is that three of you are meant to be beneficiaries of this will trust, aren't you? Normally you would need to act together. HB
    • Octopus allows you to pay by variable Direct Debit, so you pay only for what you use but still benefit from DD pricing. That's what I've done ever we were SOLRed over to them in July 2022.
    • Hi guys, I am about to file my defence via email as cannot log in to the claim anymore.  Can you please advise if I can paste below and if it's good to go for now, or should I add anything else in?  Thanks!  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.  1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of vehicle xxxx xxx.  2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant - Parking Eye LTD.  3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.   4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.  5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.   6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Getting onto the ladder: The first-time buyer conundrumView the full article
    • Ooops - one to many also s..... my draft reply should read as:  Thank you for your response Mr Schnur  I set out my position quite clearly in my letter of claim and nothing has changed. Your insurance requirement is unlawful and is contrary to section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act, and also section 72 of the same statute. I would also refer you to the outcomes in PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729).  My deadline for action - 1 May 2024 - still stands, and if P2G wish to avoid the addition of court costs and interest to my claim, you may wish to respond positively before that date.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NHS unfair treatment of employees


liz123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4088 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Lets just say that if you earn less than £20,000 a year, you will be the one who is put through the mill and branded a criminal. I went up against a nurse earlier this year and ended up being suspended. Although i was allowed to return to work and the disciplinary would as I was told be removed from my record after a year, I told them what I thought and that they should keep a closer eye on their staff. You are also not allowed to say what you think as then you just get branded as being difficult and it was this which lead to my suspension. Also the fact that I called this woman a few names and brought into question her professional practice. She was known as being incompetent but because she was a nurse no one had to say anything! So, a few other children had to wait longer for treatment because she was too idle to send sample results to the hospital consultant on time. If you let them, they will put words in your mouth and break you down into their way of thinking, and the NHS do have a way. Lets face it, they think they're covering their own backs but Harold Shipman really blew them out of the water!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG liz123. You have come to the right place for help and advice.

You have had a bad experience but your reaction shows that you had concerns. You are amongst friends here.

 

Just a few questions.

What is your job?........then we know how to get the right help and advice.

Was there a breach in patient safety?

Did you complete an incident form or report it to a manager/supervisor if there was?

Did you have a representative with you at the disiplinary meeting?

Have you had support for some sort of reflection since the disiplinary to make sense of what happened?

 

So sorry there are so many questions.

 

Good luck

Night Owl

Keep up the fight against Bank Charges.

 

 

Got Debt problems?

Don't panic, put the kettle on and read this

 

:-) Everything I write comes from my heart and head! The large filling cabinet that is my knowledge of life, however warped that may be!! :-)

 

<<< Please tickle my star!! if I have managed to help you or just made you chuckle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
I'm not sure I fully understand. Are you an HCA and did you take issue with one of the nursing staff? Can HCAs raise IO1s, Incident Reports, on patient safety?

 

 

yes HCAs can but they have to be justifiable, and sadly

 

1. a few too many HCAs simply 'do not know what they do not know '

 

2. a proportion of HCAs do not appreciate that a reasonable request from any Registered Member of staff should be undertaken

 

3. a proportion of HCAs believe that their length of service makes them more important and /or senior than Reghistered Staff with lesser service ...

 

4. a proportion of HCAs beleive that their opinions on certain topics hold more weight than they can safely be allowed to, this causes tension between HCAs and the accountable Registered Staff.

 

this is without considering the differing levels of service that the members of professional representation organisations ( who are mainly Registered staff despite the RCN having a membership category for HCAs) get vs. the level of service offered by certain trades unions in dealing with issues

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woah, there's more than a hint of arrogance in your response ziggygbr.

 

If that is your attitude I can quite understand how liz123 must feel.

 

It reminds me of visiting my own relatives in hospital and the contempt I was shown if I dared to question the trained medics opinions or decisions. I got to the point where I held back because I thought my relatives were being penalised as a result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woah, there's more than a hint of arrogance in your response ziggygbr.

 

 

the simple fact is as a registered Practitioner I am accountable not only for my actions but for the actions of assistant grades who report to me on a shift to shift day to day basis.

 

Assistant grade job descriptions always include as the first reporting line above them Any relevant registered Staff even if their line manager / team leader is a band 6 or 7 ...

 

this also ignores the fact that the pre-registration preparation for practice for a registered practitioner runs into many thousands of hours of both theoretical and practical education and results in an award at NQF level 5 or 6 ( except the few NHS ambulance services still training paramedics to the IHCD route when it;s an NQF level 4 award) i.e. DipHE or Degree level at the very least.

 

If that is your attitude I can quite understand how liz123 must feel.

 

It reminds me of visiting my own relatives in hospital and the contempt I was shown if I dared to question the trained medics opinions or decisions. I got to the point where I held back because I thought my relatives were being penalised as a result.

 

Questioning isn't a problem , it the accusatory tone that many relatives and friends use or the default assumption that Ward staff and junior doctors are blocking access to investigations or interventions which may not even be clinically indicated at that time if at all ... especially when such demands are led by USAn consumer literature aiming at selling unnecessary investigation and/or intervention.

 

Equally relatives and friends of patients must respect the confidentiality of their relative/ friends' medical condition and record and not become threatening and /or abusive when a member of staff says that they cannot answer that particular question.

 

decisions to make disclosures which have not been made to the patient are taken extremely seriously and will involve a decision being made by Consultant grade medical staff following a multi disciplinary discussion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course medical staff & their employers try to frustrate investigation. As someone who has been involved in litigation against the NHS I can vouch that their attempts to cover up their mistakes & shortcomings are often mind boggling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But questioning does seem to be a problem for many nurses ziggygbr. I was never abusive. I was certainly frustrated by the apparent lack of knowledge, the inertia and apathy. As an example (and I have many) my relative was taking aspirin prior to admission. I knew the reasons. Whilst in hospital my relative developed a DVT for which they were prescribed warfarin. I noted that the aspirin had not been stopped. I asked one of the trained nurses why this would be. She shrugged. I asked the next day and the next. Eventually the aspirin was stopped. This was pretty much the way things were. Without offering an explanation I can only wonder at the competence (and I note all the training and qualifications you have listed) of those caring for my relative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can take both aspirin & warfarin at the same time it depends on the blood levels

 

and the clinical indications for both are not exclusive...

 

and neither contraindicates the other , they work in different places of the clotting cascade ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, when I asked the question, I didn't expect a shrug from a trained nurse and I didn't expect to have to ask the question multiple times, then the aspirn to be stopped without any explanation from nurse or doctor. If it was the right thing to do it should have been done sooner. If it was the wrong thing to do, it shouldn't have been done just because I persistently asked the question. This and many other incidents left me without confidence in the medical staff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Sali as a nurse I often jump right on stuff like that...asking a doc if he wants to review a patients drug chart because certain things are prescribed together etc etc. It usually takes about 3 days to sort out, so overwhelmed with jobs are the docs and nurses. As a trained nurse I have so many patients that it is completely impossible to keep on top of everything that is happening with them. I will make a mental note of anything a relative tells me and add it to the list of jobs depending on where it is on the priority scale (because they know the patient better) but I ain't stopping for more than two seconds to talk about it since I can barely get to my patients at all during the time allowed.

 

But aspirin can be given on occasion with warfarin, depends on the INR. When the INR changed maybe they decided to stop it.

 

Zippy makes good points about HCA's not knowing what they do not know. I used to be an HCA and I never understood why the nurses did the things that they did, when they did, whilst not tending to other things that *I* thought were the most important right away. I understand now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
yes HCAs can but they have to be justifiable, and sadly

 

1. a few too many HCAs simply 'do not know what they do not know '

 

2. a proportion of HCAs do not appreciate that a reasonable request from any Registered Member of staff should be undertaken

 

3. a proportion of HCAs believe that their length of service makes them more important and /or senior than Reghistered Staff with lesser service ...

 

4. a proportion of HCAs beleive that their opinions on certain topics hold more weight than they can safely be allowed to, this causes tension between HCAs and the accountable Registered Staff.

 

this is without considering the differing levels of service that the members of professional representation organisations ( who are mainly Registered staff despite the RCN having a membership category for HCAs) get vs. the level of service offered by certain trades unions in dealing with issues

 

 

 

Well it's a good job I wasn't a HCA, you just assummed I was so clearly you could level a really misguided and insulting argument at HCA's. What did you do that for? Why do you assume HCA's don't follow instructions from nurses and superiors? Do you think they are all lackies or something who need to be told what to do? The woman I was talking about was also off sick for four weeks, two weeks after she started with us so to begin with, we were all more experienced than her but she didn't help herself by being off for so long. So you need to factor 'registered' staff competencies in to you little argument too before you begin typing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome back liz123 - it's been a long time.

I hope you got things sorted.

Keep up the fight against Bank Charges.

 

 

Got Debt problems?

Don't panic, put the kettle on and read this

 

:-) Everything I write comes from my heart and head! The large filling cabinet that is my knowledge of life, however warped that may be!! :-)

 

<<< Please tickle my star!! if I have managed to help you or just made you chuckle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...