Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aplins/Hillesden Securities Ltd (dlc) claimform - old HBOS Credit Card debt -got CCJ but WON CO Hearing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4555 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 435
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Any advice from anyone?

Do I write back and just tell them that the document they are relying on is only a reservation form and not a cca? Also those copies of statements they sent, I haven't had any statements from the credit card company for at least a couple of years, and its strange that they have all got the same balance with no extra charges on them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the legal system, but surely if they still haven't produced a copy of your agreement, and they are relying on the 'application' form then they will not take it to court. I think you may have to make a request for them to put up or shut, by requesting the documents they will be presenting in court. I can't understand how they have given you 7 days to offer a deal to them or they will ask for a strike-out either, you have put in a defence so surely the court must let you have your say. I don't know the procedure for this but probably a more qualified person will be along shortly to advise

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need to get my reply to these clowns asap, but I just want to clarify a couple of things with your help before I put pen to paper.

1. The 'agreement' is just what it says, a reservation form, nothing else. This is what I have to point out to them.

 

2. I have just dug out the first copy they sent me and the terms and conditions are different. I say different, there is actually a page missing from the recent ones that I received. Its the page that states the charges. Will this make a difference?

 

3.Can anyone tell me when credit card charges were reduced from £25 to £12 (I've searched and not found anything as yet) as I'm sure when I took my card out the charges started at £25 and the first T&C say it is £12.

 

As soon as I know this info I will get the letter sorted and post it on here for any further assistance.

 

They have given me 7 days to reply or they will apply for a strike out, I received it on Sat so need to get it done soon.

Typical, I have been out of work for 14mths, plenty of time on my hands, on Friday I got word I had got a job starting today, and they do this to me.:(

 

This is the letter I have done to send back to them, could someone please look at it for me to make sure I am doing things the right way. Ideally I need to get this in the post no later than Thursday.

 

Thank you for your letter of 13/08/10 in which you enclose a copy of a what you assert to be a copy of my “original agreement with Bank of Scotland I note the document enclosed with your letter is a photostatic copy of a document that is clearly labelled as a Bank of Scotland Reservation Form

Therefore I request that you supply me with

1. A legible copy of the true agreement including terms and conditions from the time the agreement was signed.

2. A full statement of account - itemising all interest & charges from the commencement of the alleged agreement to date

3. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement

4. The Deed of Assignment

5. Any other documents you seek to rely on in court.

Please ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter.

 

Also, I sent the defence to Aplins, but received the letter back from DLC not Hillesdens, I know they are all one and the same, but which one of them do I send this letter to?:-?

 

just bumping this up in the hope that someone will take a look at it for me.

 

Anyone please, I really need to get it in the post tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the reply I received on Wednesday in response to my last letter to them. They are still insisting that the reservation form satisfies the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I don't know what they mean by the original agreement and the true copy sent to me, all I've received are photocopies of it. Can they not go any further with this until I receive copies of all the statements I requested?

Any help would be much appreciated on this as it is going a lot further than I ever expected.:(

Edited by Shazza50
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what questions you want answered shazza lol.

 

BTW, most companies amended their charges from the higher amounts to £12.00 sometime in 2006 after the OFT ruling that deemed above that unfair.

 

Did you ever receive an original Notice of Assignment from anyone ? By law it should be sent by registered (recorded delivery).

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, as regards to the deeds of assignment.

 

I received these two letters, in the same envelope end of July 09,

both letters have the same date on them which I found a bit odd.

 

Also the BOS one has 'strictly private and confidential' and my name and address on it, but was sent to me by DLC, not even in a separate envelope. As far as I remember it was not sent recorded delivery.

 

After they received a copy of my defence, DLC sent me what they say is a copy of the key pages of assignment dated 19th June 2009, but it could be for anyone as nowhere on it are there any references to me. They say they will not provide a complete copy of it to anyone other than a District Judge.

 

I have received 3 copies of terms and conditions from them and only on one copy does it state charges. These are £12, as I took the card out in 2002 am I right in thinking they are not the correct terms and conditions.

 

I have also received photocopies of a few statements, all from 2009, I haven't received any from BOS since approx 2006.

I have requested copies of all statements from when the card started, which DLC are requesting from BOS. Can they go ahead with the county court claim before I receive these?

 

IF it gets to my local county court, will I get notification from the local court or DLC?

I haven't replied to the last letter I received from them, which I posted here a few posts back, as I honestly don't know what more to do. So if anyone could suggest what my next step should be I'd be very grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The challenge here is that you need to be reasonable before any court claim - it's up to a Judge to decide if they have acted reasonably in the circumstances if they do bring a claim. Not providing you with what you've asked for may be deemed as acting unreasonable.

 

The problem with all this is that it bears no relation to the claim - it's only against costs, that the Judge can award agaisnt them if they don't act reasonably, meaning that you don't have to pay their costs of bringing the claim.

 

Whether it has been assigned correctly and legally is a matter of fact, not law, and again it's up to a Judge to decide if that assignment is lawful. I suspect they will, as they won't want injustice in a case where assignment is the only issue.

 

What you need to do is ensure you have a sound defence against any claim that they may bring against you. That means do they have a correctly executed, fully enforceable agreement? If not, this is your defence, not the assignment issues. No enforceable agreement = unlawful assignment, as the debt should never have been passed on. Enforceable agreement + unlawful assignment will not = unenforceable debt.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well here we go again. I have today received an Allocation questionaire which I have to return by 27th Sept. As yet Hillesdens/Aplins have not sent me anything that I requested from them that they are relying on in court. I gave them 7 days to produce them and this was 20th August. Do I get in touch with them again or will it be better not to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advice gratefully received. Do I get in touch with Hillesdens about the documents that I requested but as yet not received? I'm not even sure what documents, apart from the 'agreement'/ reservation form, they are going to produce to the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent Hillesdens/ DLC/Aplins a letter requesting copies of all documents that they were going to use in court, a copy is on post 96. As yet I haven't received anything back from them apart from a letter saying they were requesting them from the credit card company. Have I gone about it the right way or is there a more legal way of doing it? I'm just wondering if thats why I've not heard back as I gave them 7 days and they received it on the 20th August.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems you need some urgent help on this

 

ill deal with this in the morning

 

please list the following

 

1/ date of court claim

2/ date claim acknowledged

3/ did you send a cpr 31.14 request for info from dlc

4 have you done a defence

5/has an aq been done yet

6/ has the court done any directions yet

7/ on the claim form, what is the perticulars of claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks, I just can't get my head around all this legal jargon:sad:.

In answer to your questions:

1. The claim form from Northampton was issued on 28th July.

2. I acknowledged it on line on 10th August.

3. I sent dlc the letter on post 96, as yet not received anything back, apart from a letter stating they were requesting the statements from the credit card company. I already have a photocopy of the reservation form.

4. The defence was done when I acknowledged on line.

Defence

1. The particulars of claim discloses no cause of action and are self evidently an abuse of process,in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR (even allowing for the contraints of the bulk issue system).

2. Further to that above the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed.

 

6.Not sure what this means :oops: I've only received the Allocation questionnaire so far which I have to return by 27th Sept.

7.Particulars of claim are : The Claiments Claim is in respect of banking facilities provided at the request of the defendant and under which the amount shown below is now due and owing from the defendant.

 

Thanking you in advance for any help that you can give me. It really is appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...