Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome finance settlement figure?


jamenzo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5363 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Peeps,

 

am a newy and don't know where to put this but I took out a loan last year (12 months ago) for 2500, I pay 123.00 p/m over 3 years and thought that I need rid of these clowns.

 

when i did the agreement they said something like 3.5%, but looking over the agreement its 47.5%

I called and asked for a settlement and they said i need to put in writing so ask what i would be looking at and he said he can't say so told 1 year in to a 3 year agreement, he said that would not have paid the intrest off.

 

Is this right, any advice for me, i dont have any PPI cover said no all added extra's

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peeps,

 

am a newy and don't know where to put this but I took out a loan last year (12 months ago) for 2500, I pay 123.00 p/m over 3 years and thought that I need rid of these clowns.

 

when i did the agreement they said something like 3.5%, but looking over the agreement its 47.5%

I called and asked for a settlement and they said i need to put in writing so ask what i would be looking at and he said he can't say so told 1 year in to a 3 year agreement, he said that would not have paid the intrest off.

 

Is this right, any advice for me, i dont have any PPI cover said no all added extra's

 

As I understand it, and without seeing your agreement, Welcome apply interest each month to the balance of the loan. 47.5% works out at 3.9% each month - 3.9% of your opening £2500 is £97 so most of your payments have been swallowed up with interest. So even though you've paid £1500, I would guess only something in the region of £300-£400 as came off the principal balance. The further into the loan you go, the less you pay in interest. A lot of people get a shock early on in their Welcome agreements as they realise the balance has not gone down as much as they thought it had.

 

They still have to give you a settlement figure and you still have to put it in writing. I've never had a settlement figure off them so could only speculate what it would be or how they would calculate it - balance plus interest, undoubtedly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, and without seeing your agreement, Welcome apply interest each month to the balance of the loan. 47.5% works out at 3.9% each month - 3.9% of your opening £2500 is £97 so most of your payments have been swallowed up with interest. So even though you've paid £1500, I would guess only something in the region of £300-£400 as came off the principal balance. The further into the loan you go, the less you pay in interest. A lot of people get a shock early on in their Welcome agreements as they realise the balance has not gone down as much as they thought it had.

 

They still have to give you a settlement figure and you still have to put it in writing. I've never had a settlement figure off them so could only speculate what it would be or how they would calculate it - balance plus interest, undoubtedly.

 

 

Thanks mate, thats kinda rings true.

they use crafty tatics and numbers to draw you in.

I might bite the bullet and pay it off.

 

looking at the agreement they have charged me intrest on the acceptance fee as well the cheeky so and so's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi i had car through yes car credit but the loan for the car was with welcome finance. after reading a few posts i think iv been robbed. i was paying 230 a month on a peugeot 306 worth 5000 when i started the agreement. then 1 year from the end of the 4 year loan i was sitting at a junction when a car went into the side of me. the other car sped off never to be seen again. i was with tesco and got 1500 for it which took my loan balance to around 2000 that i still had to pay off over the last year. i was gutted no car and still paying for it. this was 4 years ago and i had the ppi and im sure i had shortfall insurance or something but was told i had to pay the loan off so i did. where would i stand with this now? could i claim anything? maybe sar them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes HFwho?, sar and cca them, request all the necessary for insurances, ppi etc... asap, they will probably do their usuall delaying tactics, and miss things out, tailor the request to include everything you need!!

youll get more info to help if you read through the other threads ...sorry the car finance is not my thing.

 

b-o-2

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...