Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with PCN Contravention 06


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Need some help with PCN Contravention 06

Having parked my car on the day of the fine, I realised that I had no change for parking meter, so I left car and ran in to the shop to get change, to be able to purchase my parking ticket, when getting back to ticket machine I realised the parking warden was putting details of my car in to his machine, I challenged him about this but as it was already through the system, as he stated there was nothing he could do. I had only been gone a minute, I kept my ticket and based my appeal on this, after the owner keeper letter arrived. I had not realised that getting change is not a reason to cancel the charge. Any parking tickets I have ever got which is not many in my life time, I have always paid. But this just was ridicules, as I left the car for a minute to get change, came back to car to see traffic warden, it was 2mins after he issued the ticket, that I got my parking display ticket if I had not argued with him I would have got the ticket sooner.

Needless to say they rejected my appeal and sent rejection notice. Has anyone any help with finding any faults with the PCN /Notice to Owner/ Rejection Notice. I will try to post images.

 

Thanks for any help

 

Pictures by katscratchmeow - Photobucket

Edited by katscratchmeow
making pics bigger
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't open the attachment.

 

Am I right in thinking that you received a Notice to Owner, then replied to it with you appeal, then received a Notice of Rejection?

 

If possible can you get a image of the documents on here, including the original PCN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing I notice is that the PCN only states one minute observation time. In a Pay & Display bay, they should have given you longer.

 

The trouble is you have now made your representation, so the only recourse you have from here is adjudication. I presume that in your representation you stated that you were getting change?

 

This is where you stand: When you park in a P&D bay, you should be allowed a few minutes (I think 5 is standard) before a PCN is issued, in case you are in the process of purchasing a ticket or (if the local regulations permit) unloading, or helping a passenger who has just got out the vehicle. But NOT to go and get change.

 

My belief is that this timescale is discretionary, and not an absolute right - in which case, not being afforded that time period it isn't solid grounds for cancellation. However it would contravene best practice and undermine the local authority's case.

 

Someone else might be able to advise if this assemssment is correct.

 

You can do one of two things - speak to the local authority and ascertain whether they consider an error was made over the observation period, and appeal to their sense of fair play. This is unlikely to get you anywhere but worth a punt in my view.

 

The other course is to apply for a hearing with PATAS, who are the adjudicator. It's free but time consuming, and how strong your case is will depend on what you put in your representation. If you put in writing that you were 5 minutes, and getting change, then you've weakened your own argument about observation times. I couldn't predict how it would go, but you have nothing to lose by going for it, other than the time and effort.

 

It's also possible that the local authority might concede rather than attend the hearing.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info, I have just relised that on the PCN it states the warden observed car from 12.35 to 12.36 but on the rejection notice it states that he observed it from 12.25 to 12.36. would this mistake be of any help to me.

 

Thanks

 

Kathy:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the rejection states different from the PCN 2 different observation times.

I bought my ticket at 12.38 after arguing with the warden he put isuued ticket at 12.36.

 

Also on my my 1st appeal to council I stated that I was only gone a minute after parking as I had no change.

Edited by katscratchmeow
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...