Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,  I'm new here, and hoping that this is the right place to post this.   I applied for pip and was awarded standard mobility (10 points).  I did an M.R. but got the same result. They acknowledge that I can't leave my house without having someone with me. They accept that I'm not completely housebound as I go out to appointments, which are not a regular occurrence, they also said that they can't award me enhanced because I'm not out most days.  Is this correct?  Surely it shouldn't matter how often I go out? 
    • The Legal Ombudsman has a wider remit than the SRA, and can always refer matters on to the SRA where they find a breach of the SRA's code.   I'd suggest writing to the solicitors, highlighting these issues, asking them to refund the money. If they don't then complain to the LO.
    • Good morning all,   I have an update for you all, shortly after my first hearing i was told i would need to have a rehearing with another company, Obviously i agreed but after the initial grievance hearing the person then asked me to enter into a private conversation, I have received the settlement offer and are disgusted as its not even half of my monthly  salary, I'm not sure what to do at this stage as i dont have the funds to finance a solicitor,so any advice would be appreciated.  
    • Sorry, but what does this mean?   Who are ARC? It would be helpful if you could be a little bit more clear about what happened. I don't understand why you are not simply proceeding against Amazon – because it is clearly their responsibility as it was their driver or courier company
    • I understand that you were involved in a contentious divorce in respect of which there was a bill for court costs – £850. You decided to challenge the costs in court and you lost and an order was made against you. We decided to appeal the order but before the appeal was heard, the solicitors made you a without prejudice offer of a 50-50 split – £425. You agree to this and you signed the document to that effect which you returned to the solicitors. Despite that the solicitors are now trying to impose the original £850 order. Is that the correct order of events? "Without prejudice" is certainly something that doesn't seem to be very well understood, including by solicitors. "Without prejudice" can protect an offer from being disclosed to the court where the offer has been refused so that it is not binding on anyone. However, without prejudice cannot be used to hide everything from the court – including wrongdoings, unethical behaviour et cetera. It seems to me that once you sign the agreement you effectively had a contract. I'd like to know a little bit more about the agreement that you signed but presumably it was intended to bring a halt to any further proceedings. I don't think there is any difficulty about disclosing a contract to the court in the circumstances. It is only the offer which was made without prejudice. Once the agreement was accepted and signed then the document acquired a wholly different character. It was no longer an offer open to be accepted or refused. It was a legally binding contract which imposed obligations upon both sides. In my view the solicitors have acted in a highly unethical way and I would begin by making a complaint to the SRA. I wonder whether the solicitors proposed the 50-50 split to you without consulting with their client and when they then contacted their client and told her what had been agreed, she refused to accept it and on that basis the solicitors recognised that they had made an error but rather than accept their responsibility and footing the £425 out of their own pockets, they preferred to get it from you. Of course this is just speculation but it seems to me to be quite a possible scenario. I'd like to see the agreement post up here please – that my sense is that you should complain to the SRA and you should tell the solicitors that this is what you're doing.
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3977 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I am really worried and need some help.

 

I had a council tax debt that was passed onto Equita, I agreed a payment plan with them and have been keeping to it for a few months now. Last month I misjudged the timings and the cheque bounced (by one day grrr) I wrote and asked them to please represent the cheque as the money was in the bank.

 

The haven't replied to this letter but now they are calling me constantly and coming to the house (4 times so far) I've been out every time but his last message said he would be back tonight, I don't know what to do should I call him or should I write to the company again? I really don't want him to keep coming to the house I live alone with a young child.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

do they have a walking possession agreement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No I haven't let them in, I wasn't home

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No I haven't let them in, I wasn't home

 

good good keep him out no matter what

 

 

phone the council and tell them that you have missed one payment

ask them to call the bailiff off as you are resuming payments

 

tell the council you are a single parent

 

you should be classed as venerable

 

National Standards for Enforcement Agents align May 2002 Vulnerable situations

 

 

  • Enforcement agents/agencies and creditors must recognise that they each have a role in ensuring that the vulnerable and socially excluded are protected and that the recovery process includes procedures agreed between the agent/agency and creditor about how such situations should be dealt with. The appropriate use of discretion is essential in every case and no amount of guidance could cover every situation, therefore the agent has a duty to contact the creditor and report the circumstances in situations where there is potential cause for concern. If necessary, the enforcement agent will advise the creditor iffurther action is appropriate. The exercise of appropriate discretion is needed, not only to protect the debtor, but also the enforcement agent who should avoid taking action which could lead to accusations of inappropriate behaviour.
  • Enforcement agents must withdraw from domestic premises if the only person present is, or appears to be, under the age of 18; they can ask when the debtor will be home - if appropriate.
  • Enforcement agents must withdraw without making enquiries if the only persons present are children who appear to be under the age of 12.
  • Wherever possible, enforcement agents should have arrangements in place for rapidly accessing translation services when these are needed, and provide on request information in large print or in Braille for debtors with impaired sight.
  • Those who might be potentially vulnerable include:
    • the elderly;
    • people with a disability;
    • the seriously ill;
    • the recently bereaved;
    • single parent families;
    • pregnant women;
    • unemployed people; and,
    • those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the bailiff company sent me a list of charges and payments I've made today but I don't know if it's right or not there seems to be a lot of charges on there also I pay £16 by cheque every month but all the payments except one I've made are listed as £10 I don't know why this is either I'm very stressed out and not thinking very clearly what should I do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

post up the charges

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Visit fee: 42.50 (this is put on 5 times)

Missed payment fee: £38.50 (3 times) I only missed one payment.

 

I've read through it and can't understand why it only sayd I've paid £10 a month each time rechecked my bankas well in case I'm going mad but each cheque sent was £16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I am having an ongoing saga with chandlers bailiffs re there fees, A bailiff compnay cannot charge multiple visit fees. How much is the debt for and how many liabilty orders where there? Also are the visit feesfor different dates? Can you add up the total debt passed frm the council and then the total fees te company have added?

 

Loads of questions I know, but the more you put u the more help you will get, DONT WORRY as there are some brilliant people on this site that will help you :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Visit fee: 42.50 (this is put on 5 times)

how many liability orders are the bailiffs collecting

are there dates next to these charges

bailiffs collecting council tax can only charge for 2 visits

THE COUNCIL TAX (ADMINISTRATION AND

ENFORCEMENT) REGULATIONS 1992 (SI 1992/613 AS

AMENDED BY SI 1993/773, SI 1998/295, SI 2003/2211, SI 2006/3395 AND SI 2007/501

(SCHEDULE 5)

NOTICE OF

CHARGES CONNECTED WITH DISTRESS

1. The sum in respect of charges connected with the distress which may be aggregated under

regulation 45(2) shall be set out in the following Table-

(1)

Matters connected with distress

(2)

Charges

A For making a visit to premises with a view

to levying distress (where no levy is

made) –

i) where the visit is the first or only such

visit £24.50

ii) where the visit is the second such

visit:£18

 

Missed payment fee: £38.50 (3 times) I only missed one payment

no such charge

I've read through it and can't understand why it only sayd I've paid £10 a month each time rechecked my bankas well in case I'm going mad but each cheque sent was £16

i would write to the council and ask them to investigate this

and all there charges

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the original amount is for £449 I think there is only one liability order as far as I know. There are no dates on the letter except for the dates I've made payments on the fees are listed after without any ref as to when they were added.

 

I don't know what the debt from teh council was I'm assuming that's what the £449 is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

phone the council and the ask how many liability orders were passed to the bailiff and the amounts of each liability order if more that one

I would ask about your payments why you are paying £16 and Equita are only crediting £10 to your account

If they are charging you £6 for every cheque they are cashing it should have been shown on you breakdown as a payment fee (I'm not saying this fee is right /wrong ) but the £6 should be on your statement somewhere

Edited by hallowitch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...