Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard commercial credit card CCA


marc.w
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a Barclaycard Business Credit Card through my Limited company.

Can anyone advise if i can CCA them to see if i have an enforceable agreement or do they work under different type of credit agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Marc,

 

The reality is that it's very difficult to get sight of any credit agreement from BC at the mo. Read other threads here and you'll get my drift.

 

Do you clear the a/c balance each month or not.

 

You can reclaim any penalty charges on the a/c.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick,

 

Thanks for the response.

I am trying to get a copy of an agreement on a personal barclaycard at moment, so i am fully aware of Barclaycards tactics. I do not clear the balance each month so i will look at any reclaiming charges.

 

The reason that i ask about the CCA is that i requested one and received an application form with no prescribed terms on it, but Barclaycard stated in their covering letter the following:-

 

"I note your reference to section 78 of the consumer credit act. If i may explain, as the account you hold is for a limited company, you are not covered under this section of the act. Therefore, we are well within our rights to pursue any unpaid debt, as per the terms and conditions of your account".

 

I have read the CCA 1974 and can only see reference to personal details not companies - is this correct, if so what act do i have to refer to or are Barclaycard just trying to confuse me? If they are it is working.

 

Please help!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mark,

 

I'll seek some help from the Site Team to clarify if the CCA1974 applies to a Ltd Co Credit Card a/c.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok maybe this snippet will clear it up;

 

 

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (as amended by the Consumer Credit Act 2006) regulates consumer credit and consumer hire agreements. Its protections apply to agreements between traders and individuals, sole traders, partnerships and unincorporated associations, but not agreements made between traders and corporate bodies such as limited companies.

 

The Act lays down rules covering:

• the form and content of agreements;

• credit advertising;

• the method of calculating the Annual Percentage Rate (APR) of the Total Charge for Credit;

• the procedures to be adopted in the event of default, termination, or early settlement; and

• the unfair relationships test.

The Act also requires that all traders who make regulated agreements or exercise rights under a regulated agreement obtain a consumer credit licence from the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). Credit brokers, credit repair businesses, debt advisors, debt management businesses and others, may also require licences.

Appeals against OFT licensing decisions should be made to the Consumer Credit Appeals Tribunal (part of the Tribunals Service).

Local trading standards departments and the OFT enforce the Act. The OFT also produces guidance about the Act and its regulations. For further information contact local trading standards departments or the Office of Fair Trading.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The crux would seem to be the word "protections"

Whether this extends to the right of Barclaycard to refuse a request for sight of a copy agreement is unclear.

But it does confirm that LCs are not afforded the same protections as the others mentioned.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Marc,

 

Can you confirm roughly when this Ltd Co card a/c was opened.

 

Have you checked yet to see if there are any penalty charges which can be reclaimed.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the info Martin3030.

 

What i am confused about is if i have no protection under CCA 1974 then what am i protected under, surely there must be some Act that covers limited companies or is it just the agreement/contract that the company enters int?. If it is the latter then all i have signed upto is an application form that is pretty illegible, has no interset rates, payment dates. The only reference to credit limit is that i have requested a figure. I also think that it is a microfische copy as it has funny numbering down the side.

 

I will try and upload application form tomorrow so that you can take a look youreself, if you don't mind? (Although i am am not sure how well it will scan).

 

p.s. I have just read the agreement again in finer detail and it does refer to the Consumer Credi Act 1974 so i am now totally confused. Also, reading the covering letter from Barclaycard commercial it states that i am not covered under this section (78) not that i am not covered under the CCA 1974.

 

So basically still confused. Any help would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Slick,

 

I can definately claim for unfair charges. Barclaycard ar still charging £30 per late payment/over limit fee.

 

The application is dated March 2002.

 

I assume the best thing is to SAR them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Marc,

 

Please confirm we are talking here ONLY about the Ltd Co BC a/c. I see you mention a personal a/c above - this should be discussed on a separate thread if nec'y so the 2 issues don't get confused.

 

The SAR may not help you here as that's a request for all personal data concerning an individual.

 

But I assume, as this is about a Ltd Co, that you still have statements going back 6 years at least. The state's will give you all you need to reclaim penalty charges.

 

As regards the credit agreement, it may help if you post it but with identifying details hidden. Personally, I think CCA1974 offers protection to individuals putting CCard Co's under obligation to make credit agreements, and run a/c's, in the manner laid out in the legislation.

 

Whereas with a Ltd Co a/c, you cannot rely on CCA1974 or similar legislation. General contract law would govern whether you applied for and used the Ltd Co credit card.

 

If you don't want to pay the a/c anymore, BC will take you to court and ask for a judgement based on:-

 

1. The signed agreement.

 

2. The fact that you have used the a/c to pay for goods for years.

 

3. The fact that you've paid the monthly payments for years.

 

Because BC would not have to provide an agreement which complies with CCA1974, a judge would rely on these issues and find against you (or your Ltd Co).

 

This is just my opinion and Martin or others may think differently.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Slick.

 

Yes i am only speaking about my Ltd company credit card. I probably do have all my statements somewhere, will have to search my garage as moved recently and all files are boxed.

I take your point regarding contract law governing and what the judge will look at. Best i start getting back on track with them!

 

I will post up agreement anyway later today to see if it throws anything up.

 

thanks

 

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...