Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unrecorded Search


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5376 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I had an unrecorded search on MY Experian report by a DCA, can I have this removed?

I know it's unrecorded by I never gave this DCA permission to do a search, or do they still have a right to do the search?

The DCA wrote to me several times asking if I was a MR xxxx xxxx, they spelt my first name wrong by 1 letter, I responded saying I was not, they then checked my credit file against my address and then wrote back to me this time with my first name spelt correctly.

I have this search against on my file but with the wrong name.

I have asked Experian and the DCA to remove this, Experian have replied with the standard reply of writing to the DCA but if they do not give permission they can't remove it.

I have complained to OFT and ICO but this has gone for 6 weeks now and I've heard nothing.

Is there nothing really I can do about this? Or can I take this further? Even to the point of taking both Experian and DCA to court for breach of Data protection?

Or basically am I just talking a load of B****CKS and should just accept this and move on? :confused:

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help me out here someone - why is an unrecorded search important? If its unrecorded (how does that happen?) how do you know its been done and what difference can it make to anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not that important to the fact that it will not stop you from getting credit. It's a check to see if someone lives at a certain address for instance.

 

I noticed it because I pay for the alert service of experian so knew about it within 24 hours of being recorded.

 

My gripe is that is was carried out by a DCA for a credit card debt to find out if I lived at my address. I did not give them permission to do this, they didn't ask me, and it turns out that the DCA does not have a CCA for the debt either.

 

I don't see why they should have access to my records if I haven't given permission, even if the search is nothing, but they can see my records etc, surely this is a breach of data protection?

 

It may sound petty but I really what to do something about this why should DCA have this access and why should experian give them such easy access. What can I do? Or can't I do anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing is that the credit card debt goes back many years and when I asked the DCA for a CCA they closed the account saying that the original creditor did not have one, therefore there's no sighned CCA by me which should mean I never even gave the original creditor permission to check my file as they don't have a signed CCA.

 

The reason for the check on my file is that they sent a letter to me at my address asking if I was MR xxxx xxxx with my first name mis-spelt by one letter, I told them that the person does not live at my address, that's when they did the check on my file to get my correct name I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...