Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Is this what an enforceable Creit agreement looks Like?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After sending a CCA request letter many months ago halifax defaulted and an "account in dispute letter was sent", it was later passed on to a DC. The last letter i sent requested them to hand this back to halifax. I didn't hear anything for 4 weeks or so but now I've received this>

 

http://i567.photobucket.com/albums/s..._pro/bo_3a.jpg

http://i567.photobucket.com/albums/s..._pro/bo_2a.jpg

 

I think it's enforceable, anyone have an opinion? It's a poor photo copy with my credit card number written on the top. It came with a compliments slip with a sarcastic "Thanks" but no letter and no name of the sender.

 

Thank you everyone!

Edited by sonny_j
Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but can't read it, if you can does it have:

 

B Repayments

A term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of the following-

(a) Number of repayments;

(b) Amount of repayments;

© Frequency and timing of repayments;

(d) Dates of repayments;

(e) The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable.

 

C Rate of interest

A term stating the rate of interest to be applied to the credit issued under the agreement

D Credit limit

This may be a term or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a copy of a microfiche and is unenforceable because it is illegible. It would never be accepted in court because no one could read it. Tell them the account remains in dispute until you receive a legible copy of the alleged credit agreement.

 

The Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983

Legibility of notices and copy documents and wording of prescribed Forms

(1) The lettering in every notice in a Form prescribed by these Regulations and in every copy of an executed agreement, security instrument or other document referred to in the Act and delivered or sent to a debtor, hirer or surety under any provision of the Act shall, apart from any signature, be easily legible “

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for you reply.

 

It is illegible in places especially the figures for the interest rates. Maybe a bad photocopy but looks like there's ink on it. Anyway, I can make out that it includes details of monthly payments at the beginning of each month. It has a box with the interest rates and a statement detailing the interest but the figures are quite faded. There is an initial credit limit but this was increased later.

 

There is a front page which is the application and a statement about the data protection act and a declaration {which states "I confirm that I have received a copy of and agree to be bound by the credit card conditions"}. This part is completely unsigned, but I'm guessing they have the signature on the part that matters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Firstly, may I thanks everyone for their previous replies. Everything went quiet until recently.

 

Just a quick update. I received a letter from RW (DCA) apologising for the delay in investigating my despute. They then got in touch saying my account had been closed. They are now threatening to send a collector round, and if i dont want this to happen email or telephone them. I've ignored this so far but now about 5 days later I received an account statement from halifax complete with a payment slip. It also states "You have failed to make minimum payment" (which is the full amount) and "you have broken your credit agreement". After they served 2 default notices months ago for 1 CC, I am sure they cancelled my agreement saying that the full balance is now due. I will have to double check. I am a bit lost as to what will happen next and what reply should I send. My main concern is that they are now sending me statements again and hope they will not start to add charges and interest again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore them. You sent an "in dispute" letter, and they haven't sent a legible agreement, so it's still in dispute. Don't worry about their silly threats of sending someone round, it's all hot air. In the unlikely event that someone does call, just tell them to bog off, as politely, or otherwise, as you like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Thanks for the previous replies. I hadn't heard anything for several weeks. Iqor have passed in on to a solicitor JPB, stating "Iqor are likely to take court action if they don't receive the full amount in 10 days".

 

The letter is from Preston but that solicitor doesn't seem to have offices there. Do they use their letter headed paper? The letter asks to contact iqor direct and not to contact JPB (jeffery parker bourn)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical response - they are "likely" to take action - they know they cannot. Threatening court action where there is no possibility of it happening is against OFT guidelines and another DCA is being monitored for those shoddy tactics. I would just continue to ignore them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

According to a joker from Cabot, it doesn't matter whether the copy they send is illegible as it legible was when i signed it!!!

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks again. I sent Iquor an In dispute letter from the template library (sent recorded). I sent one to the previous DCA Robson Way back in July, who closed their files but they then passed it onto Iquor who I'm now having to deal with. Many thanks for your help, I will let you know their response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience Iqor give in pretty quickly, expecially when you contact the OFT, I send my letters by email and CC them to the OFT.

With both my dealings with them, as soon as they knew that I had contacted the OFT Iqor wrote a grovelly letter saying they were returning my accounts to the OC etc etc.

Take Care

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the email address and contact details for iqor's vice president

 

Nataly Hollinworth

Head of Compliance,Vice President

iQor Recovery Services Ltd

iQor House

33/34 Winckley Square

Preston

United Kingdom

PR1 3EL

[email protected]

 

 

 

simply email her your complaint and state reference/account number and complience is required to prevent possible legal action. or write her a letter which ever you prefer.

 

Then go on to write an email or letter stating everything that has happen, what laws they are in breach of etc and that you request they send you a copy of the company complaints procedure within 14 days and that they have 8 weeks in which to investigate and resolve your compliants to a lever in which you are satisfied with. Keep it to the point and document everything that was said by phone and by letter with the dates, names etc and state all laws they are in breach off etc and any case laws if needed. keep it detailed but simple to read and to the point.

 

Thats what i did when iqor starting pursuing me, pestering me for paypal balance of 12 quid lol which was a result of paypal funding payment that had not been authorised. i also charged them 25 quid admin fee for each phone call they made me and for each letter they sent me giving them 14 days to pay and late fee of 10 pounds per week after they failed to pay within the 14 days. so now the invoice is up to about 250 quid. Havent heard a word from them since or from anyone else either.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Thanks again for the advice everyone gave. I didn't hear anything after I sent my in dispute letter but they have now passed it onto Moocroft's Pre Court division!? I received a second letter from them today and it's bright yellow with comic sans font. So if anyone on here gets a bright yellow envelope you know you it's from!

 

What are these people like to deal with? Is another dispute letter necessary?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moorcoft and their pathetic Pre-School Division are to be pitied rather than feared :rolleyes:

 

As the alleged debt has been passed on whilst in dispute, you should now report them to Trading Standards and the OFT. That usually makes them go away. You definitely do not need to send another dispute letter, and I would just ignore the morons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

HI, just a quick update, it's now been passed onto Wescot and their solicitor. Sorry i didn't report the last lot to the OFT as it went quiet for about 9 weeks, but I was wondering how to go about reporting them, is there a template letter I can use or a from to fill out? sorry to sound like such a novice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

MOORCROFT PRE-SCHOOL DIVISION !:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: says it all really!

WETCLOTHS :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

CREDIT SECURITY :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

If they were football teams they would all be relegated to the championship in this order!lol

Edited by twoman
update
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi, This has been passed to i_qor again who have passed it to a solicitor called Geffrery parker bourne, who claim they are ("may be")taking me to court in 7 days. The last time the letters were not from the solicitors office but this one is. I beleive that they do go through the small claims court from what I have read, is this always the case?? I think I should send them an in dispute letter but not sure how to word or include the legal stuff about the legibility of the documents they sent.:???:

 

I'd be grateful for any help here. thank you again!

Edited by sonny_j
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...