Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dx100uk - thank you for your advice.  I will send a SAR to Vanquis and really appreciate all the help on here.   I may have read your last sentence in the way that it was not intended but it has came across very judgmental and not helpful.  I have came on this site for some help, not to be judged.  If that was not your intention then I apologise as I realise text can be read in the way it was not intended.  
    • . I'm sorry but this is not correct. There is a very long established rule that you are required to exercise utmost good faith (uberrima fides) when becoming a party to any kind of insurance contract. This means that you have quite a strict duty to accept responsibility for disclosing any information which a reasonable person in your position might understand could materially affect the risk. I can imagine that the interpretation of this rule would not be applied quite so strictly to a very new and young driver – but the more that one has been driving and the more insurance policies one has held, then I think that the stricter  this rule becomes. It is also well established that one can misrepresent something simply by withholding information – by silence. I'm sorry to say that I think that this rule and the value of it is so self-evident that it is scarcely worth discussing. I wouldn't start raising this issue if I were you with insurers or the courts because you will come away with a bloody nose and loss of credibility
    • @unclebulgaria67 your point is particularly valid especially in regards to loss in the event of a claim. Irrespective of 2x SP30’s or not the vehicle is insured for its full market value. The insurers rating changes based on risk against those endorsements, where said risk calculation isn’t made available.    Also I question the validation of 22% in premium. Is that based on today’s risk profiling, or is that applied retrospectively to day 1 and can that be evidenced.    One thing that is very clear, is that to bring about any degree of misrepresentation the insurer has to have evidence that questions were asked in regards to the endorsements.   This was an auto renewal and when I’ve checked the Brokers electronic Copy on “My Policy’ at renewal, there is no section included relative to accidents in the last 5 yrs or Motoring convictions. Everything else relative to me and the named driver is listed. 
    • Here is what exposes Johnson & Co Commission document, makes for sober reading   Wonder if Snake Oil Singham has read and digested it?   https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/brexit_files/info_site/com_2020_324_2_communication_from_commission_to_inst_en_0.pdf
    • Must be a positive if the Insurers are now using the legislation as it was intended. It is just that I have not heard of it being used for Car Insurance, as the 22% comes from the Insurers rating calculations, which is not available information to the Policyholder. With Home Insurance, if you Insured a Building for £100k, when it should have been Insured for £122k, it is easier to grasp.   The Insurers would have issued the policy documents clearly showing that no motoring offences had been included within the premium calculation and the OP has had 5 months to correct the record with Insurers before the accident.   Perhaps probe the Insurers on the 22%. Can they provide evidence from their Underwriting rating guidance that this is the extra premium for 2 SP30's.
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
crem

Speed Camera Vans

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3989 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Do the speed camera vans always run tandem ANPR cameras as well? Perhaps times are getting hard for them to keep their income up and they are trying to keep the quota up by having the 2 systems running together.

 

I went past the van the other day at one of his favourite income spots (just over the brow of a small dip on a 30 road). Obviously I wasn't speeding (gives halo an extra polish) but then I get a letter today saying I've been reported for the spacing on my number plate!

 

Granted the space between the 2 groups of letters is a little small (well whats the point of having a private plate if you can't nudge them a tad ;)), but they are standard size, colour, font, etc etc, and have been on my car for the past 9 years! Now they decide they can't read the damn thing apparently.

 

Got threatened with a 60quid fine and an s172. :mad:

 

As it was only a warning letter I don't have to send the s172 back unless I was no longer the keeper so it says (but I'll hang on to the letter just in case they try going for the 1000quid fine).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Often the vans are hard to tell apart every van I have seen in the last year has been purely ANPR admitedly I don't get out of London much but they seem to be using them a great deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They must have been able to read them well enough to be able to send you a letter!

 

There's your defence ! ;)


If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There's your defence ! ;)

 

I doubt very much that it did read it, more likely is that it flags up non recognised plates which are then manually read and then a letter sent. Being able to a read a plate is neither here nor there if its not as prescribed its an offence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Often the vans are hard to tell apart every van I have seen in the last year has been purely ANPR admitedly I don't get out of London much but they seem to be using them a great deal.

 

The only van we have in this area is the council (or speed partnership whatever that they go under now) operated one which parks up in easy victim territory (oops I meant serious accident blackspots :p) so I am sure it is the same one which must have both cameras in now.

 

They must have been able to read them well enough to be able to send you a letter!

True, but OK to be fair, they didn't claim it was unreadable just "non compliant" coz all the letters are spaced at 11mm instead of having the 33mm between the 2 groups. But as you say, it clearly is still perfectly readable by their machines and in no way configured to mislead or deceive anyone. It's been fine for 9 years so far but I've had to change it today of course. I'm not overchuffed that they think this is the biggest crime they need to be dealing with at the moment. :mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not overchuffed that they think this is the biggest crime they need to be dealing with at the moment. :mad:

 

I'm sure they don't consider it a major crime but it's still an offence, which in all honesty has no excuse. Its easy to fail to notice a worn tyre or blown bulb but it's not like a reg. plate suddely changes from the legal format that came with the car all on it's own is it?

Edited by green_and_mean

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They can be co-located, but there is little point to having a mobile ANPR unit without Police presence to stop vehicles. Else how would they catch un-registered vehicles, etc. if they don't stop at the time, they only know about it.

 

Also, AIUI, the fixed penalty for VRM irregularity is £30.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, AIUI, the fixed penalty for VRM irregularity is £30.

 

...has been reported for the alleged offence of the vehicle reg mark not complying with the standard format due to spacing.

 

This offence carries a penalty of £60 fine, however, on this occasion a written warning is deemed appropriate........

 

..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They can be co-located, but there is little point to having a mobile ANPR unit without Police presence to stop vehicles. Else how would they catch un-registered vehicles, etc. if they don't stop at the time, they only know about it.

 

You are right that they will fail to resolve unregistered vehicles, but they will be able to record all the ones that are supposed to be SORN, flag up as no insurance or no MOT etc. where they can just send the fines out to the RKs address. Of course. it depends on where you think they are intending to take the cars off the road or are just happy enough to maintain the revenue flow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are right that they will fail to resolve unregistered vehicles, but they will be able to record all the ones that are supposed to be SORN, flag up as no insurance or no MOT etc. where they can just send the fines out to the RKs address. Of course. it depends on where you think they are intending to take the cars off the road or are just happy enough to maintain the revenue flow.

 

I may be mistaken but I'm sure that fines for no insurance or tax cannot be given by purely camera evidence.

Edited by green_and_mean

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I may be mistaken but I'm sure that fines for no insurance or tax can be given by purely camera evidence.

 

Not that I'm aware of.

 

A camera has no way whatsoever of knowing about a vehicle being driven on DOC for insurance or as a exempt vehicle for tax. Anyway, as there is no requirement for the RK to hold a driving licence; there can be, ipso facto, no require for the RK to have insurance to drive the vehicle. In this country, the law requires that the driver be insured, not the vehicle.

 

There is a requirement for the vehicle to be stopped at the time in order to ascertain the above.

 

Even for speeding, a camera cannot issue a fine. It only triggers a NIP to be sent to the RK requiring the identification of the driver. The camera provides only half the necessary evidence for a speeding conviction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not that I'm aware of.

 

A camera has no way whatsoever of knowing about a vehicle being driven on DOC for insurance or as a exempt vehicle for tax. Anyway, as there is no requirement for the RK to hold a driving licence; there can be, ipso facto, no require for the RK to have insurance to drive the vehicle. In this country, the law requires that the driver be insured, not the vehicle.

 

There is a requirement for the vehicle to be stopped at the time in order to ascertain the above.

 

Even for speeding, a camera cannot issue a fine. It only triggers a NIP to be sent to the RK requiring the identification of the driver. The camera provides only half the necessary evidence for a speeding conviction.

 

 

I meant NOT be given, lol lol!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange then, taking all of the above into account, do you think there was an ANPR running in the van, or has the little man in the back just written my plate down coz he didn't like the look of it as I passed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Strange then, taking all of the above into account, do you think there was an ANPR running in the van, or has the little man in the back just written my plate down coz he didn't like the look of it as I passed?

 

As I mentioned earlier ANPR will flag up unrecognised plates these can either be stored and reveiwed later or noted at the time by the operator in the van.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
..

 

It may be with the recent change in the penalty amount for VRM's and Seatbelts (now £60) they are having a crackdown to make the point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a new hot topic north of the border. There's been a huge clampdown recently on non conforming number plates in and around Glasgow recently. I have a pal who works for Strathclyde Police who told me thatsoon virtually every car in the force will have an ANPR camera fitted.

 

In the area cars this links real-time into the PNC and alert the police driver to anomalies as they are spotted, others will simply record the details for analysis later. Its proving to be really useful for detecting untaxed and uninsured vehicles.

 

He went on to say that they wouldn't usually stop someone just because the letters were mis-spaced, but if there's anything else going on they will add the number plate to the list of offences.

 

Glasgow Council also operate Community Warden vans which drive around neighbourhoods at night and these will also have ANPR systems, primarily looking for untaxed vehicles and there are already a couple of ANPR cameras on the M8, although he wouldn't tell me where!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its proving to be really useful for detecting .... uninsured vehicles.

 

 

Here we go again.:rolleyes:

 

How does ANPR detect an uninsured vehicle? It can certainly compare the VRM with MID, but can't know that a vehicle is being driven on DOC or trade policy for example.

 

Furthermore, there is no requirement whatsoever for a vehicle to be insured. The RTA requires the driver to be insured to use the vehicle.

 

(And it's an urban myth that other insurance must already exist on a vehicle for DOC to be used)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ANPR can only detect an untaxed vehicle but using the various databases it can help to determine whether or not any insurance is registered for the vehicle and will alert the police driver that further information is required if none is found, if it were covered under a trade policy for example.

 

Ok - although is is technically incorrect to refer to the vehicle as being uninsured, it is a term commonly used where people do not have insurance to cover the vehicle they are driving.

 

The point I was making was that the use of ANPR cameras are becoming more widespread and now in Glasgow at least, they are being used in fixed positions.

 

One other thing - if there's no requirement for an RK to be insured, how would the car get a tax disk? I only ask because I have just taken my other car off a SORN and because my NCD is used on my main car, the premium for the scond car was quite high. My partner offered to get insurance instead but was told by several insurance companies only RK's can do this.

 

So without an insurance document in my name for that vehicle I couldn't get it taxed. Because we didn't want to transfer the car to her name we ended up going to a specialist insurer on a limited miles policy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Drivers are insured not vehicles. The claimed basis for use of ANPR for this is false.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A vehicle must be insured by someone if its ever left on the highway which would cover the tax issue. A 'DOC' policy cannot be used other than whilst the car is being used by the insured person. Your wife cannot insure her car and claim her DOC policy covers your car parked at home if she is at work with her car parked outside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Drivers are insured not vehicles. The claimed basis for use of ANPR for this is false.

 

Which is why cars are stopped and the driver questioned if no insurance is shown, they cannot convict on ANPR evidence its to aid the police in identifying vehicles that may be uninsured just as the roadside breath test indicates drivers that MAY be over the limit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

One other thing - if there's no requirement for an RK to be insured, how would the car get a tax disk? I only ask because I have just taken my other car off a SORN and because my NCD is used on my main car, the premium for the scond car was quite high. My partner offered to get insurance instead but was told by several insurance companies only RK's can do this.

 

So without an insurance document in my name for that vehicle I couldn't get it taxed. Because we didn't want to transfer the car to her name we ended up going to a specialist insurer on a limited miles policy.

 

The insurance companies are mis-informing you, or you didn't understand what they were saying, or they didn't want your business for some reason.

 

I have 2 cars in the house where I am the RK. but I mainly drive one and my wife drives the other. What the insurance companies expect, and in fact demand, is that the insurance policy is taken out in the name of the main driver of the vehicle. Therefore, my wife's policy is perfectly legal and correct even though she is not the RK of the vehicle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an interesting point. I had been with them for several years and there was no misunderstanding on my part. They clearly said that they need the car to be registered in the name of the insured. Needless to say I'm not with them any more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's an interesting point. I had been with them for several years and there was no misunderstanding on my part. They clearly said that they need the car to be registered in the name of the insured. Needless to say I'm not with them any more.

 

There are countless instances where the RK would not be insured. If you got banned for drink driving and hired a chauffer with a clean licence to drive you about in YOUR Bentley why would you need to insure the vehicle or transfer the V5 to him/her, you could insure car in their name?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...