Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ebay pulling a con?


merlin100
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, Ive bought and sold things through Ebay for quite some time now with very little hassle, until this......

 

Last week I sold an item for £109. The buyer paid and I sent the goods off. Both parties happy due to feedback being posted - now the con.....

 

Upon trying to get the money from Paypal, they say they attempted to put the money into my account but it was returned ( this is after it "disappeared" for a week). They now say its because my bank account details need updating (same account number, sort code etc for several years).

Being a highly distrustive person I looked into this further and found that Paypaldont actually want an update on my records - they just want it to look like this.

What they are actually up to is for me (and Im sure many others) to place my details on a Direct Debit mandate so they can take any fees and costs instantly at a later date.

This will give them their money irrespective of any dispute or holding arguements at a later date - and we all know how impossible it already is to get money back from them once some kind of dispute is in place.

Anyway, Iv ecancelled my account and thought I would share this crafty experience!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sold something on eBay once, and never again. I will buy though!

 

I sold a buggy. It wasn't used, and was in a sealed box. First the buyer contacted me, claiming to not have received it. When I pointed out that it was sent by registered post and had been signed for, I begun to receive abusive emails whereby she threatened to get her husband to "sort it out"

 

She got my address and phone number from either ebay or paypal, and left messages on my phone to the effect of reading out my address and her husband was a long distance lorry driver and she's see to it that he popped by on his deliveries.

 

I ignored it. I was then contacted by paypal, who said the buyer had lodged a "not as described" stating that the buggy had food spillage and stank. I advised paypal that the buggy had been in a sealed box and had never been opened when it was sent. I forwarded them the abusive emails, including the one where she had claimed initially to not have received it, and advised them of the phone messages.

 

Paypal, with no evidence of her claims but plenty evidence of mine, found in HER favour. Their decision was to give her 10 days to post the buggy to me by traceable means and they would hold MY money till she issued them proof of postage and then refund her.

 

She never did post it so I got my money back. Obviously was out to keep the buggy without having to pay. *itch.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have bought and sold loads of stuff on ebay and only ever had a handful of problems.

But when it comes to seller protection it is almost zero. In the event of a dispute of any kind it seems that the seller is presumed in the wrong immediately.

I never sell any high value items on ebay any more as I know there is a high possibility of paypal snatching my money back from me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys, pretty much as I thought. Its time to be highly distrustive of Ebay and Paypal.

 

My suggestion is that if you do need to enter bank or card details within Ebay or PP, then always remove them straight after the transaction, this will stop Ebay or PP being sneaky and grabbing your money unwarranted, it also ensures that a simple hack into your PP account ensures that no-one can steal anything (PP accounts are a lot less secure than most banking sites !)

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

So youre complaint is eith PayPal and not eBay...?

 

You must have asked them to pay uoi - as otherwise it would sit as a credit balance on your PayPal account. Now, if you then requested the funds transferred then provided them with the details, if you made an error in the account and sort number, the funds you be returned to PayPal and they would seek clarification. They also charge you for this error - so you need to be carefyl where the error lay.

 

If the money was actually credited and NOT returned, because of an incorrect account routing, would you be of the opinion this was PayPal's fault too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats right Freakyleaky, you do.

Yes, I requested the money. It then "vanished" for a week - Paypal didnt have it, nor did my bank.

The account details they held were the same ones they have held for several years - so no cock-up on my part there.

Then the money finally turned up again in my Paypal account. I requested it again and got an email saying they couldnt release it as they needed an update on my bank account details.

Its only when I looked further that I realised it was a DD mandate.

 

Not a chance!!

 

We have now spent the money on Ebay and closed the account - its getting to distrustive for me. I dont have any confidence in either one of them..

Edited by freakyleaky
Correcting my name
Link to post
Share on other sites

PayPal are governed by whom, then?

 

Some items I sent went 'missing', but the buyer was too threatening and keen to get an instant refund to convincing. I asked PayPal for time to see if the item would show up, but they instantly refunded the buyer. Those items could well still show up. They also didn't give two hoots for me to make any further enquiries of the post office, they wouldn't wait.

 

Also, I sent money from my PayPal account to my bank account, and then used some 'echeques' through PayPal (via my bank account) to pay for some items. When I asked PayPal specifically if they would honour those payments, on time, they specifically said yes, then they didn't (obviously!). I got charged by my bank as PayPal tried to pay the echeques, whilst still holding my money in their account. PayPal refused to pay the bank charges.

 

They really are a joke and offer no real protection if you're a seller. All your protection comes from your own insistance on recorded delivery and insurance. They need tighter regulation.

 

And what is their relationship with eBay anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what i did, is provide the details and then paypal set the direct debit up, i then rang my bank and said paypal has no direct debit and anything on file should be cancelled so there cancelled the direct debit on there side, so untill paypal requests money from my account there dont know the direct debit is cancelled.

 

if you ever in a dispute which has ended your account in minus as a refund has been issued and you dont agree, ring your bank up and basically say paypal have no authority to take anything from you account, the bank will make sure nothing is takn, and paypal will have to listen to you then

Link to post
Share on other sites

Items that go 'missing' is an issue for eBay AND PayPal (if you used their service). Since it is well known you have to insure the item in transit at your expense, if it doesn't arrive (or does arrive and isn't signed for, allowing a fraudulent claim) what does it matter? Since the buer asserts non-delivery, and the carrier cannot provide the evidence of delivery, your claim is for compensation for the loss of the sale.

 

Hopefully these eCheques are dumped - they take an inordinate amount of time to clear and are no better than a 'gift certificate', but they're not a formal Bill of Exchange (that a cheque is) so there's little to compare.

 

I'm a seller, I trade warily and only got stung twice - the first was my stupidity (but I learned quickly), on the second - I sent an item tracked, it was signed for but the buyer denied recieving it. Paypal accepted the image of the signature, then said it was NOT the name of the buyer. (Which it wasn't). They refunded him and I was stuffed.

 

Two weeks later he contacts me to say the item HAD been delivered to his neighbour, who signed for it then went on holiday for 2 weeks. He thanked me and repaid the amount. He could just as easily have kept the goods and the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some good experiences here.

I wonder if Paypal/Ebay are beginning to see the losses to their businessess as people become more aware of their underhand and unfair dealings and move away from them.

This leads on to the curremt practise that I have no confidence in - their ability to collect their fees irrespective of any outcome between buyer and seller, and any impending decision they may make ( which, as we know, almost always favours the buyer).

Ive done with Ebay/Paypal, based on the obvious fact that their dealings cannot be considered to be fair practise, coupled with the almost impossible task of reitrieving any money from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...