Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tesco and Natwest (RBS) credit card challenge


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5005 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi peeps,

 

Okay, today I received a reply from RBS for my Natwest CC, It would appear they are sending the 'usual response.' The two page letter states the following points:

 

What the statutory requirements are for providing a 'true copy' of the CCA. It is the agreement relevant to the card product at the date the card agreement was made, plus a copy of the terms of the card product. These copies should be accompanied by the statement of financial information relating to the account.

 

There is no obligation for them to provide a copy of the original agreement bearing signatures. And under Reg 3 (2) a 'true copy' does not need to contact all personal information relating to the borrower, nor does it need to include a signature box or dates of signatures.

 

As such, a copy of the CCA has been provided to me along with T&C's and a statement of the balance. They see no reason to enter into further correspondence. However, if I am not satisfied with this response, I may seek whatever legal redress I consider open to me.

 

They do not consider the account to be in dispute and my indebtedness on the account remains due and payable. All non payments will be recorded as default on my credit file. I am urged to take advice from CAB if I continue to doubt the veracity of what I have been told.

YS

Amanda Tretton

Senior Customer Advisor

 

I shall have a bit of a read and see what is the next letter I need to send. Any help would be gratefully received.

 

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice of them to let you know that there is no dispute, despite the fact that you have stated to them that there is.

 

Under regulations they are able to omit the name/address, signature, signature box and signature date - but aside from that what they have sent you should mirror exactly the contents of the executed agreement which you signed including all the prescribed terms at the rates etc to which you agreed upon signing.

 

A lot of banks are now trying to fob customers off with generic Terms & Conditions where there are no executed agreements in existence... simply why go to the trouble of provided another document if the executed agreement is available to simply take a copy from.

 

Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents)

Regulations 1983

 

3 General requirements as to form and content of copy documents

(1) Subject to the following provisions of these Regulations, every copy of an executed agreement, security instrument

or other document referred to in the Act and delivered or sent to a debtor, hirer or surety under any provision of the Act

shall be a true copy thereof.

(2) There may be omitted from any such copy--

(a) any information included in an executed agreement, security instrument or other document relating to the debtor,

hirer or surety or included for the use of the creditor or owner only which is not required to be included therein by the

Act or any Regulations thereunder as to the form and content of the document of which it is a copy;

(b) any signature box, signature or date of signature (other than, in the case of a copy of a cancellable executed

agreement delivered to the debtor under section 63(1) of the Act, the date of the signature by the debtor of an

agreement to which section 68(b) of the Act applies);

© in the case of any copy of an unexecuted agreement delivered or sent to the debtor or hirer under section 62 of

the Act, the name and address of the debtor or hirer; and

[(d) in the case of any copy of an executed agreement given to the debtor under section 77(1) of the Act for fixedsum

credit, or under section 78(1) for running-account credit, under which a person takes any articles in pawn, any

description of the article taken in pawn.]

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had another look through my NW file, and they didn't even send me an application form, let alone the CCA. Just some photocopied T&C's with the word COPY over them.

 

With my Tesco CC I have got a copy of my application form - dated 1999! Doesn't time fly!

 

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ooh, I have received a Yellow card with the word WARNING in red on it. Remind me of Lost in Space... warning, warning... anyway I digress!

 

It's from Allied International Credit UK Ltd, advising I need to call Mr Watson urgently. I believe it's to do with my Tesco cc (client RBS).

 

Think I now need to send my bemused letter to them. I might just wait to see if I get something from my Natwest cc as any letters I receive are normally within one week of each other.

 

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Hi peeps,

 

Just to let you know that Natwest have passed my file onto Triton.

 

Received their first 'call us immediately' letter. Shall ignore for now and will reply when I break up from Uni.

 

x:)x

 

Am I right in thinking that they have passed your alleged debt onto a DCA?

During the period of your dispute, ie; asking for the original cca were you still making the regular payments?

I thought if you carried on paying despite asking for a true copy of the original agreement they could not hand the debt over? :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi all,

 

Thought I'd give you all an update on where I am with my NW c/c and Tesco c/c.

 

I think I better start different threads as well and keep this one as Natwest (RBS) challenge.

 

Okay, NW have passed my debt to RMA (Risk Management Alternatives). They're a new one on me.

 

Have yet to reply or send an a/c in dispute letter to them.

 

x:)x

 

I will start a new thread for the Tesco (RBS) c/c challenge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh sorry peeps,

 

silly me.... let me get this right :rolleyes:

 

14th December - passed to Triton with a NOTICE OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

4th January - passed to Green & Co (who were instructed by Triton, who are instructed by NW)

 

31st January - passed to RMA

 

Silly me... fancy leaving my admin in such a state ;)

 

x:)x

Edited by texanbar
fish fingers
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

ANother letter from RMA, saying that unless I call them, they may need to return my file back to NW (heaven forbid!!) who shall then decide the appropriate action.

 

Thank goodness I have found this site, at least I can actually have a little giggle with my hubby when I receive their letters as opposed to being a quivering wreck.

 

Another one for the file

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi all,

 

I'm back and cooking the DCA letter's today!

 

Okay, just to advise that RMA still have my a/c from Natwest.

Latest letter was dated 8th March. They are still pleading with me to get in touch, or they really really will have to pass the account back to NW.

 

Hope you are all keeping well

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all,

 

Latest letter received was beginning of July, which were from Westminsters Solicitors, saying they have been instructed by RMA to review my a/c.

 

Haven't heard or received anything further.

 

Hope you're all well

x:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...