Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • EU deal replicated 'as far as possible' ... aka less than   "The British Government is continuing to work intensively on securing continuity with other countries. We have secured agreements – either signed or agreed in principle - that account for 64% of the UK’s trade with all the countries with which the UK is seeking continuity, should we leave the EU without a deal."   With what I've seen on that page I linked earlier, that would seem to be decidedly unambitious 'trade deals across the world larger than the EU
    • dx100uk - thank you for your advice.  I will send a SAR to Vanquis and really appreciate all the help on here.   I may have read your last sentence in the way that it was not intended but it has came across very judgmental and not helpful.  I have came on this site for some help, not to be judged.  If that was not your intention then I apologise as I realise text can be read in the way it was not intended.  
    • . I'm sorry but this is not correct. There is a very long established rule that you are required to exercise utmost good faith (uberrima fides) when becoming a party to any kind of insurance contract. This means that you have quite a strict duty to accept responsibility for disclosing any information which a reasonable person in your position might understand could materially affect the risk. I can imagine that the interpretation of this rule would not be applied quite so strictly to a very new and young driver – but the more that one has been driving and the more insurance policies one has held, then I think that the stricter  this rule becomes. It is also well established that one can misrepresent something simply by withholding information – by silence. I'm sorry to say that I think that this rule and the value of it is so self-evident that it is scarcely worth discussing. I wouldn't start raising this issue if I were you with insurers or the courts because you will come away with a bloody nose and loss of credibility
    • @unclebulgaria67 your point is particularly valid especially in regards to loss in the event of a claim. Irrespective of 2x SP30’s or not the vehicle is insured for its full market value. The insurers rating changes based on risk against those endorsements, where said risk calculation isn’t made available.    Also I question the validation of 22% in premium. Is that based on today’s risk profiling, or is that applied retrospectively to day 1 and can that be evidenced.    One thing that is very clear, is that to bring about any degree of misrepresentation the insurer has to have evidence that questions were asked in regards to the endorsements.   This was an auto renewal and when I’ve checked the Brokers electronic Copy on “My Policy’ at renewal, there is no section included relative to accidents in the last 5 yrs or Motoring convictions. Everything else relative to me and the named driver is listed. 
    • Here is what exposes Johnson & Co Commission document, makes for sober reading   Wonder if Snake Oil Singham has read and digested it?   https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/brexit_files/info_site/com_2020_324_2_communication_from_commission_to_inst_en_0.pdf
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
Soveliss

Parking Charge Notice

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3922 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have been reading these forums for quite a while and although I think I have a fair understanding of where I stand, I would just like some confirmation.

 

I parked my car in a car park (Scotland, Ayrshire) ran by "TPS Parking Solutions", I was parked there for 2 hours 2 minutes. Two weeks later I received a parking charge notice for the sum of £45.00 (if paid within 14 days).

 

I had no knowledge of there being a time limit this car park as there were no signs at the entrance to the car park and only a few around the actual car park. However there were no signs near where I was parked, in fact for me to have pysically seen the signs I would have had to take my eyes of the road or have walked through the busy car park opposed to the path. The car park on the date was also extremely full.

 

Basically I would just like to know where I stand, should I send one of the template letters? Or should I just simply ignore it? or god forbid pay the fine?

 

I phoned my Citizens Advice Bureau and they advised me to appeal, but said that if I did not pay the fine that I could and most likely would be taken to court, which would end in me paying a lot more money.

 

Thank you in advance for taking the time to read my post, and I hope that someone can help.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Citizens Advice's phones are manned by do gooders who know sod all about anything.

 

• do not pay

• do not contact them

• there is no appeal process - nno private company will turn down profit

• ignore any threatening junkmail from them or their powerless debt collectors

• they will give up and go away

 

It's a mail [problem].

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What Al27 said. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That reply made me feel empowered hehe, this is something I want to firmly stand my ground on.

 

Just to clarify they cannot take me to court for the money or effect my credit rating can they?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That reply made me feel empowered hehe, this is something I want to firmly stand my ground on.

 

Just to clarify they cannot take me to court for the money or effect my credit rating can they?

 

They can take you to Court. But with a proper defence they should not win.

 

For it to affect your credit rating, they would have to gain judgement and you not pay it.

 

There is more chance of me running to the Moon naked than both of these happening!

 

Jogs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically it's really not worth their time trying to take me to court?

 

Basically all they can do is pester me with letters which I can shred and phone calls I can ignore?

 

Out of curiousity what would my defense be in court? The fact that their signage was poor or what the actual law states? (Which in this instance I am not overly familiar with)

 

I am still fairly new to driving (under a year) so I will take this as a learning experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The long established remedy for breach of contract (providing a contract had been formed in the first place) is damages and the measure of the same is to put the injured party in the same position had the breach not occurred. It is trite law (Wilson v Love 1896, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v New Garage Motor 1915 et al) that a penalty cannot be imposed for breach of contract.

 

ie. if a car park charges £1 an hour and you stay 1 hour 10 minutes, they are owed 10 pence.

 

There's no money in this though - much more profitable to put up a signa saying "if you stay over 2 hours you agree to pay £45".

 

Of course, if that was enforceable they'd make it £10,000 and retire to the Seychelles.

 

But everything's part of the [problem] - £45 and a lot of people will pay voluntarily. It's a mail [problem] - if you can get 50% of people to pay after sending out a few threatening letters, it's a good business to be in.

 

Court isn't profitable, especially considering they haven't got a legal leg to stand on anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Invariably PPC's shoot themselves in the foot with their paperwork. In the very unliklely event that these muppets take you to court it would do your case no harm to show their paperwork to the court.

 

I wouldn't shred their bumf - keep it as evidence to use against them.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your much helpful advice.

 

I will be ignoring all further correspondence from these [problematic].

 

Just one last question, what are your guys experience with parking tickets?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you all for your much helpful advice.

 

I will be ignoring all further correspondence from these [problematic].

 

Just one last question, what are your guys experience with parking tickets?

 

I would say between the regulars it is abundant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I realise that this is a different company but thought this might be worth a read - Glasgow driver hit with £5k parking fine - The Sunday Mail

 

Perhaps things in Scotland are a little different, after all it was a Scottish Sherriff who ruled that clamping was illegal in Scotland in his landmark ruling in 1992 as it constituted "extortion and theft".

Edited by rickyd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We've yet to see the transcript of that. No idea what our Polish friend's actual defence was.

 

Also a high chance CPS are still out of pocket - they've had to pay for a solictor and some people are happy to live with a CCJ and not pay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think CPS will care about the costs, for them it'll be about scoring a "victory" which they can quote as evidence that they are legal and get results.

 

Their website includes another case featuring Edinburgh University but it's was too long and detailed to includ here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I would update you guys on what has happened.

 

I have received 2 or so more letters telling me they "may" they "could" take me to court etc but since then I have heard nothing.

 

I have also been threatend with bailiffs, but since as far as I am led to believe most bailiffs are illegal in Scotland I think this is a fairly empty threat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To send in a bailiff they'd have to take you to court (not going to happen), win the case (not going to happen) then you refused to pay up.

 

Continue to ignore everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...