Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

"picture" secured loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5331 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

 

ive been in a IVA for 18 months now and still have a secured loan which i pay over £500 a month , i took this out 4 years ago to pay off credit cards and loans before id heard of IVA , is it possible to include this in the Iva or any other help as im really struggling and realise i have to pay this loan or lose my home

 

any advice appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that all loans etc. HAD to be included in an IVA, but maybe I am wrong. If you have been paying £500 a month on just one loan, you may find that your IVA may be rescinded as you have obviously got more income available than was thought!

 

This is not an area I am too familiar with so I am sure others with more knowledge will be along to offer help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was never told about ' picture' going into receivership ? when was this and will it affect my secured loan etc ???????

 

i receved a letter from the company who i had my IVA with last month asking for the signed agreement with picture as maybe a chance the loan wasnt legal but i didnt respond as its in joint names with my wife and dont want her hassled like we have been with a joint loan we had which i included in my IVA , they continually bombard her demanding payment off her as her name is on the loan with mine

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again

 

ive just done a calculation that after the 20 years loan duration i will have paid over 130k to picture ( this was only taken to pay credit cards and loans off in the region of 20k ) what a massive mistake i made doing that but at the time i just didnt know what to do to survive

 

i guess im paying back big time though now as along with the picure loan of £546 i have mortgage of £480 and IVA £350 ....3 massive payments every month

Link to post
Share on other sites

Picture stopped trading in the Spring of 2008. You should have had a letter from the current collectors of your payment, also called Picture but not related to the original company(except that they took on some of the old Picture's staff). They are now collecting the payments on behalf of the banks who furnished the loans for Picture, Merrill Lynch and Deutsche Bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Because you owe the money to Picture's administrators and they are using another company to collect it - the debt is not written off just because the company goes bust. Stop paying it and the administrators will come down on you like a ton of bricks for your house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think im going to make a ppi claim against them as my head was all over the place at the time , hadnt a clue what i was sold etc

 

i dont have any of my agreement with them to check exactly what i do have , i just pay £546 PER MONTH , loan taken out 3 years ago

 

if picture no longer exist am i wasting my time trying to claim from them for mis selling of ppi ??

 

if only i knew now what i did at the time i consolidated my debt , taking this loan was biggest mistake ever and have another 17 years left

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have said - mis-sold PPI claims for Picture are being dealt with by the FSCS.

 

hi again , thanks for your help

 

is there any template letters on here to send FSCS ? or any help with what to write etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've read that a loan over 25K can't be unenforcable using the methods on these fora. I've also heard of people who have checked loans approx 100K and found them to be unenforcable.

 

I'm not sure whether it's worth my while sending a SAR to Picture to check my loan agreement. It's a secured loan for 60K. Anyone able to advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Until 6 April 2008, agreements were excluded from regulation if the amount of credit or hire exceeded £25,000. However, this financial limit was removed for all new credit and hire agreements by the Consumer Credit Act 2006. Pre-existing agreements above £25,000 remain outside CCA regulation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mine was taken out may 2006 then i re financed it again in october 2006 so i guess im stuck with it for another 22 years :(

 

makes me mad how picture can go kaput yet we still continue paying to whoever

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Had a look but cannot see anything about Target cancelling the insurance. Of course they would have to cancel it if it was mis-sold. They will be told to do so by Deloitte. I would have thought that Deloitte as Picture's administrators would have the legal authority to alter the Land Registry but it is an interesting legal question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...