Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Payday Loans - Cancel Debit Card??? **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You go into the post office and ask them for a crossed postal order for the amount you want. You will have to pay extra for the postal order but it is worth it. You can either have the name put on it who you want it payable to or you can write it on yourself.

It is like a cheque, but with a postal order you have to buy it.

 

Bub1

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you get the postal order you will get a receipt for it with the postal order number on.

Also, send it Recorded Delivery. Put all your receipts with a copy of the paperwork you are sending.

That way you have a complete record of everything.

 

bub1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Toadface

 

I'd suggest starting a new thread in the Welcome section, there are a lot (and I mean a LOT!) of people there who could help but won't see your thread here.

 

If/when you do it would be worth mentioning if it is HP/loan/secured etc. amount borrowed/paid/owing, duration, arrears etc. these all have a bearing, also, do you have PPI or any other form of insurance from them. Be as complete as possible, including posting images of agreements and correspondence (minus identiying info).

 

Hopefully see you there and you will get a lot of Welcome specific advice.

 

T2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to bring this back but I had a Payday loan and cancelled my card (a number of times) and spoke to the bank and they did not stop the money being paid.

 

The bank said that once the company have a form with my cards details on, etc, a prepayment of sorts, and the firm claims the money then they have to honour the payment.

 

So, there are firms out there, I agree, where they have not claimed the money because i have stopped the card, perhaps they are not aware of this "loophole" but I can assure you this one firm were able to take the money and the bank did nothing to stop it. They said was in the terms and conditions of the card use, etc (i did not check this but they were extremely convincing (?))

 

Hence me being O/D on the account with added bank charges ( because I moved all my money out in time) of which I laughed at when i saw them considering this site!

 

So, be very wary, there are circumstances where they will claim money. I have posted a thread on this but got limited help but thought I wouldn't due the weirdness of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is interesting

so the banks are saying they have to honour payments with an old debt card and the firms have your details to usei

 

thats called a continiouse credit authority,

you have to sign it

 

companies keeping card holders details is a no no

dpa and banking code

 

the bank has no defence in allowing payment on a cancelled card

Link to post
Share on other sites

Echo (very loudly) what sewing kit has said - the vast majority of them will try and claim against card details and it will not matter that you have closed the account/cancelled the card. Some have come to an arrangement quickly but presume those that do not may well attempt to take money from your cancelled card/closed account!

 

Now postggj raises a term I have had quoted at me before - by both bank and pirate company! The thing is that although they set the payment up like this I know a number of the "agreements" upon which this is based do not mention continuous payment authorities! Are we heading for a heap load more unenforceable agreements?? (we can hope! :p)

 

Toadface - hi, worth persisting on insisting that Welcome provide you with accout details to pay them - I got someone at my local office "the account manager" to do this (eventually) as refused to pay by card - told them they were preventing me from paying them and would ensure this was highlighted if they proceeded any further with action against me. Worked quite quickly together with highlighting that they were delaying any payment of their liability because they insisted I payed them by a method which I was unable to do.

 

Best of luck all

MJC 007.5 :cool:

 

Advice or opinions offered by mjc 007.5 are personal, offered in good faith and without prejudice or liability. Your decisions and actions are your own and should you be in any doubt then please seek the opinion of a fully qualified and insured professional

 

:) If you think I have helped you please feel free to click on my scales :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

though tid post an update of how things are going. recieved a hpone call from QuickQuid last night, but i wasnt home. emailed them today to ask to set up payment plan, my offer was £12 per month.

 

I again asked that they not phone me at home or at work and that any future correspondance be in writting.

 

email I recieved back:

 

Dear XXXXXXXXX,

Customer # XXXXXXXX

Thank you for contacting us to inquire about how to pay off your balance. By signing your loan agreement, you agreed to the Terms and Conditions outlined in the 'Consent to Electronic Communication' section. Therefore, we are within our rights to contact you via phone.

The payment plan we can offer is detailed below.

£_62,00________due 10/08/2009

*Current loan balance £250,00 due on 28/08/2009

To confirm your agreement to this payment plan, please reply to this email stating that the terms are favorable. You must include the original email with the terms to which you are agreeing in your response.

Once we have heard back from you, we will set up the agreed upon debits to come out of your bank account or be charged to your debit card.

Collection procedures will continue until an acceptable payment arrangement is made.

If you have any queries, our Collections Department is here to help.

 

 

There is no way I can pay this amount per month to them. they have a copy of my monthly expenditure so they can see how much i have left to pay creditors.

 

It also seems like they are wanting the remainign balance paid at the end of this month. and that the outstanding balance would be £250 after the £62 payment. this is more than I would have been paying!!!1

 

It was one payment of £50 then, £250 the next month!

 

 

should I email them back asking them to reconsider the amount, not sure what I should do now

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Have this with QQ they say they will accept 3 payments over 3 months and they are not a contract lending company etc., this is in email.

 

Just keep writing back to them that what they are asking you cannot do and they know what you can afford, if you can do into your account and change your contact details eg: phone.

 

I did say to them that if they continued to phone I would report it to the police as harrassment the calls have stopped for now, but the emails havent.

Just keep replying back with what you have done that is what I do, you always get the same email back from them but with a different persons name on the bottom.

 

Just keep at it.

 

Bub1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Toadface,

 

As Bub says I think main thing is just keep replying with what you can afford. Ideally if not already you want their bank account details to pay by standing order (postal order if you have to) but not cheque, direct debit or card payments - they will clear you out.

 

Phone contact - the template letter on this site amended to suit - as long as you are making an offer to pay and keeping in touch (by email in this case) you are within your rights to insist on all in writing (and indeed can present this as being to their advantage as well so there is a record of what the naughty debtor has done ;)). Practical steps would include using an internet based line that they can only leave messages on (you can therefore log calls and ignore), on the mobile setting all the numbers in their own contacts group (suitable ringtone for all so you know when to ignore - imperial war march from star wars here but amend to taste) or if you can afford it the truecall (not able to myself but reviews are rave!).

 

On the numbers you give looks like they are effectively either attempting to make you pay charges then the loan principle or worst still extension fee and charges (both of these a serious no no - customer has advised in difficulty, attempts to arrange repayment plan and gets told not acceptable but you can extend the loan!). I think complaints will be in order to relevant bodies (FSA, Trading standards ? others) and a CCA request (followed by dispute of charges, request for complaints procedure).

 

Main thing will be stick to your proposals (no formal authority will give them more if you have done a viable I&E), no phone contact (unless confirming you are getting what you want - even then followed up in writing) and do not let them have any bank details (you control the repayment method and amount).

 

Keep at them ;)

MJC 007.5 :cool:

 

Advice or opinions offered by mjc 007.5 are personal, offered in good faith and without prejudice or liability. Your decisions and actions are your own and should you be in any doubt then please seek the opinion of a fully qualified and insured professional

 

:) If you think I have helped you please feel free to click on my scales :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...