Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12+2 working days.   a dca can't hurt you credit file any more anyway.   only the original creditor can issue and register a default, on or before the sale of the debt.   what the dca put in the calendar section is immaterial as only you and them can see it it does not extend the 6yrs period whereby the debt shows on your file and after which the 6th defaulted date's birthday causes the whole file to removed regardless to paid or not, paying or not......makes no odds. it still goes, but might still be owed mind, depending upon the contents of the CCA return.   dx  
    • Hello   I agree with dx100uk.   Send them a CCA request which is a request for them to produce the original agreement that gives rise to the debt.  They have a limited amount of time (I think around fifteen days) to send you the document.   Here are the possible follow-ons from that:   1. They don't respond within 15 days and so you are legally entitled to stop paying until they do send a response. 2. They send a letter saying they have gone back to the original creditor to ask for the document and they need more time.  You (legally) stop paying after fifteen days and don't pay them again until they send proof. (This is the most likely first response as they wont have any of your documentation as they bought your debt as part of 1000 others on a spreadsheet on a CD ROM or USB stick). 3. They send you something that looks like a contract or which might be something else that they want you to think is the contract within the time frame.   After either of the above  whatever they send you should be referred back here for an assessment as they will often send you unsigned documents or made up bits of nonsense.  Even if the contract turns out to be the genuine one it still might not be enforceable due to errors made by the creditor at the time of signing.   The only potential downside to the above is that they could try to damage your credit record but probably it is as much damaged as it can be by this debt already so nothing else they can do will make it worse.   Following on from the above you can continue to not pay them.  I would setup an on-line savings account and pay yourself the money instead which has the advantage of creating a resource in case you need to resume payments in the future.   They may send you further letters either inducing you to resume payments by threat or by offering you a deal.  If the document is not valid then the only deal you need to take is the one you unilaterally entered into at T plus 15 days when you agreed with yourself not to pay them another penny.   It is not impossible that they will send you a letter saying the debt is unenforceable (miraculously I have actually seen one!) and asking you to pay anyway which you will of course ignore as you should not be giving any member of this low life industry any encouragement.  
    • I agree and I've no doubt that will happen in the future, but if a court claim is issued and a ccj successfully registered against the debtor then it will never be sb anyway, so are we more likely to see more court claims in the future ?      Can it not work both way though, if the sb date is ultimately aligned to the date of the default notice, essentially giving the creditor 6 years to collect or issue a court claim then regardless of when the debt was last acknowledged / payment made, a debtor could just tell the creditor to eff off after the 6 years is up, figuratively speaking     
    • Received acknowledgement of defence submission from court. VCS now have the option of continuing their claim or not. Watch this space !!!!
    • Yes it doesn't work HB  In Wales someone needed a test on a Sunday, the testing station at Llandudno Hospital was closed, so they could either go to Manchester, 75 miles, or Cardiff 200 miles and a 10 hour round trip.   But as Manchester is England no guarantee on getting test results.
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
Smackbat

Sickness Absence Review - What can I do?

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3997 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have today been informed that I am to be placed on sickness absence review. The reason being that in the past 12 months rolling period I have been off on 8 occurances for a total of 17 days. The sickness has been well documented and I have doctors certificates to cover these periods. :evil:

 

I am a sales manager and as a result of the sickness absense review I will not receive any commission for 6 months (about £7k) and will not be able to have this backdated at the end of the review, I will not be able to take time off as flexi and I will not be in a position to receive a pay increase in Dec in line with the rest of the company.

 

I am obviously not happy, if my sickness had formed a pattern or I was not genuinely ill - one instance I came into work despite being signed off because I knew how serious my absence was, only to become dizzy at the top of a flight of stairs and fall down them and be taken home by my manager, i had an inner ear infection.

 

My company T&C's on sickness absense states

 

"The emphasis of this review is on remedial action designed to restore attendance to an acceptable level.

Reasons, duration’s, frequencies, patterns of absence, departmental needs and individual circumstances all differ therefore it is not possible to state optimum levels after which an employee could expect to be placed on review.

Prior to an employee being placed on Sickness Absence Review they will be required to attend an informal investigative interview with their manager or Team Leader to discuss their levels of absence. If following this meeting the Manager or Team Leader decides the employee should be placed on Sickness Absence Review they shall be formally advised in writing.

The letter will state the duration of the review (normally 6 months but may be curtailed or extended depending upon an individuals attendance record) and the dates for interim review meetings. The purpose of the interim review meeting is to discuss attendance and review progress since being placed on review.

 

Whilst on Sickness Absence Review you will be required to have a full return to work interview after any period of absence (this will be in addition to the periodic review meetings). You may also be required to visit the Company Medical Advisor for the purposes of obtaining independent medical advice.

 

Should an employee’s absenteeism continue to be unacceptable they may be subject to disciplinary action and ultimately dismissal.

 

Whilst on Sickness Absence Review the Company reserves the right not to pay an employee for any period of sickness absence. Such action will only be taken after the Manager or Team Leader concerned has discussed the case with the Head of Human Resources. Should it be decided not to pay for a period of sickness absence the employee will be advised in writing.

 

When your Manager or Team Leader believes you have attained an acceptable level of attendance you will then be formally advised in writing that you are no longer on Sickness Absence Review.

 

The right of representation is available at all stages whilst on Sickness Absence Review"

 

I have expressed my opinions to my direct manager, I am unhappy for a number of reasons.

 

1) I was off in Jan/Feb with an inner ear infection, on my return I had been off sick on 9 occurances totalling 19 days. I was not given an absence review at this point. My absense has now decreased over a rolling 12 month period (8 occurances totalling 17 days), having been off sick the beginning of the month for 4 days.

 

2) At the beginning of the month I was off for 4 days suspecting swine flu, I went to the Dr on day 2 who was unsure and took a swab but advised me to remain off work for at least 48hrs. When I was informed it was not swine flu I went straight back to work. We then had a communication at work advising if we had any flu like symptoms, we were to stay at home.

 

3) My commission will not be held and then paid if I am not sick during the next six months. Other employees have had their commission backdated upon successful completion of the review period - I feel I am being discriminated against.

 

4) My sickness has not affected my performance, in the past 12 months my 2 appraisals I have been graded as exceptional performance exceeding all stretch targets.

 

5) The fact i should be placed on sickness absence review was decided by HR and not my manager who advises me that he fought nail and tooth not to be placed on sickness absence review - the T&C's say that it is my manager who makes the decision.

 

I wish to now approach my HR with a resolution, advising of the above reasons why I am unhappy and a proposal that if I exceed my stretch targets by x % then my commission can be backdated upon successful completion of the review period. I will indicate the benefit to the co in keeping me motivated, however I don't believe this will make any difference.

 

Please can someone offer me some advise!! Do you think I have a grievance I can raise? Is there anything else I can do? If not do you think I have a case for discrimination?

 

Than k you all so much for having a look at this for me! :D

 

Smackbat

Edited by Smackbat

<(o.o)> Smackbat

 

:) Smile.co.uk - £4,400 WON 12/10/06

:)Smile.co.uk - £156 WON Feb 07

:)Smile.co.uk - £280 WON 25/06/07

:mad: Egg PLC - £3,420.72 - Defence filed 24/06/07

:? Alliance & Leicester - DPR Request sent

:? Woolich PLC - To Start

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit I can see their point in respect to the sick review. Over five months that's nearly a week off sick every month :p

 

Regardless of that, what on earth is the point of curtailing someone who works in sales' commission? And for that. That's ludicrous. You'll not dare be off sick for a while but whilst you're at work where's the incentive to do your job ie sell! There isn't any incentive at all.

 

No one works in sales with all the hassle that goes with it for the love of it alone, or just for a basic salary anyway. They're idiots. Plus, that's a penalty...or rather a punishment, to me. They're putting you on sick review - that's enough. Punishing you for your sick record by infact removing your means of earning a living too I'd say is grossly unreasonable.

 

I've heard of commission stopping whilst someone is off sick, and pay rises being postponed until a person returns from sick leave but never heard of either or both happening to punish someone for having been off sick.

 

Yes, I'd certainly be submitting a grievance about those elements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...