Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ist Credit Notice of Assignment LLoyds debt


Halfangelhalftart
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5341 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have had a letter today that begins:

"We give you notice that Lloyds TSB Bank has assigned to 1st Credit...all of the Bank's rights in to and under the above detailed account....As a result of this assignment...."

 

Is this a Notice of Assignment and as such should have been sent to me by recorded delivery?

 

Thanks for your advice.

 

Cara

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lilly White

 

Yes, it was from people in Reigate.

 

 

I have had no dealings with Lloyds TSB since I entered into an IVA circa 1998.

 

 

My IVA was defaulted in 2001 when my joint IVA partner did a moonlight flit to the states.

 

 

It was then taken up by Mackenzie Hall.

 

 

I was paying them until I got wise to them via this site and CCA'd them.

 

 

They didn't comply and have heard nothing since about 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a read

 

 

 

Assigning A Debt Or Benefit Of Contract?

 

6 December 2005

 

 

 

Assigning A Debt Or Benefit Of Contract?

 

It is important to first provide the debtor with a notice of the assignment!

 

Other points and issues that should be borne in mind:

 

· In principle, the benefit of a contract can be legally assigned without consent, provided there is no express prohibition on assignment or, for example, a requirement that consent is obtained.

 

· Where there is no restriction on assignment, the usual way of assigning the benefit of contractual rights is by statutory assignment. The assignment must be in writing, signed by the assignor, absolute (not purporting to be by way of charge only) and notice in writing must be given to the other contracting party (section 136, Law of Property Act 1925).

 

· If a contract is not effectively assigned under statute, it may still be assigned under common law by an equitable assignment. An equitable assignment may exist where the requirements for a statutory assignment are not satisfied. The main practical consequence of an equitable assignment is that the assignee cannot bring an action in its own name against the third party, but must fall back on the rules governing equitable assignments and join the assignor as a party to the action.

 

It is, in any event, desirable for notice of an assignment to be given to the third party because the third party will otherwise be entitled to continue to make payments to the assignor. Notice will give the assignee priority over any other assignee that has failed to give notice, provided there is no knowledge of such prior assignment.

 

ok well we need to find out who owns the debt have a good read

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter states that the full amount outstanding is due to 1st Credit. "Following the assignment of this account by Lloyds TSB, 1st Credit is the data controller of your information in respect of this account"

 

Would I need to request an SRA to find out if this is infact truthful?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it would seem that the NAO that you received would indicate that they have bought the alleged debt.

 

if you contact these people in Reigate it confirms that you acknowledge the assignment.

 

So you can ask for the CCA. that means you need to contact them.

 

Or Wait until the bank send you the sar.or they confirm the assignment

 

A DEFENCE.

 

The Defendant denies that he is liable to the Claimant as alleged in the demand at all. It is averred that the Claimant has failed to serve a Notice of Assignment in accordance with section 136(1), of the Law of Property Act 1925, in respect of the alleged debt. The amount detailed in the Claimant’s claim, which is likely to include penalty charges, which are unlawful at Common Law, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company Ltd v New Garage and Motor Company Ltd [1915], under The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Accordingly, the inclusion of penalty charges in the purported Notice of Assignment renders it entirely legally unenforceable. The Claimant has failed to comply with section 136(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925, by furnishing a Notice of Assignment in respect of that which is denied, that is inaccurate, W.F.Harrison and Co Ltd v Burke [1956].

 

The defendant requires sight of the notice of assignment of the debt. In addition the defendant requires proof of service of the Notice of Assignment in accordance with s196 of the Law of Property Act 1925 which is required to give the claimant a legitimate right of action in their own name since it appears this is an assigned debt. the reason the defendant requests this information is inter alia to clarify the dates are correctly stated on all documents , the defendant notes that if there are errors in the assignment it may be rendered in effectual in law per W F Harrison and Co Ltd v Burke and another - [1956] 2 All ER 169

 

LILLY WHITE

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice. I think I'll ignore it for now until they send an NOA by recorded delivery. . I'm wary of SARing Lloyds as that might make them start chasing me!!

 

Catch 22 if you don't contact 1st crud they will continue with threats and may chance going for a court judgement on the grounds they think you won't contest. If you do they won't go away easily until you can prove the debt is uneforcable by one way or another

 

I would SAR Lloyds as they will have sold it on which more than likely means something is missing from enforcing this. If not they would have first got one of the others to try collecting on their behalf. I don't know about Lloyds but when Barclaycard sold mine on their was nothing in my file from BCard to me to say they had assigned this to 1st Crud and despite my requests to 1st and others thay haven't been able to provide it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This debt was put into an IVA in 1998 and then taken up by Mackenzie Hall when I had to default the IVA (long story). MH weren't able to provide a signed credit agreement....Would MH give it back to Lloyds to then give it to 1st Credit? Or would 1st Credit have bought it off MH. And if MH didn't have a signed credit agreement, then I'm assuming 1st Credit won't either.

 

As a result of BCard and 1st Cred not being able to provide evidence of assigning the debt to 1st Cred, does this mean 1st Cred are unable to chase you for the money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I was able to prove they couldn't enforce it due to the missing prescribed terms and a default notice which didn't take into account the time taken to serve. The debt isn't enforcable and I'm using this to negotiate a reduced settlement on my terms or they get nothing.

 

I didn't find out about the agreement or the default notice until after I SAR'd them. They didn't send all the info the first time and I kept having to remind them about what was missing.

 

I didn't do any of this until after 1st crud had issued an SD which then led me to find this site but since then have gone after my other alleged debts before they have come after me.

 

1st Crud/BCard & A&L - They have both given up their court cases.

Halifax have run out of DCA's to ask and disappear when challenged

HSBC they have given up for the time being

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I was able to prove they couldn't enforce it due to the missing prescribed terms and a default notice which didn't take into account the time taken to serve. The debt isn't enforcable and I'm using this to negotiate a reduced settlement on my terms or they get nothing.

 

I didn't find out about the agreement or the default notice until after I SAR'd them. They didn't send all the info the first time and I kept having to remind them about what was missing.

 

I didn't do any of this until after 1st crud had issued an SD which then led me to find this site but since then have gone after my other alleged debts before they have come after me.

 

1st Crud/BCard & A&L - They have both given up their court cases.

Halifax have run out of DCA's to ask and disappear when challenged

HSBC they have given up for the time being

 

Can you start your own thread so replies don't get mixed up please...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes and also do a CCA request either as part of the SAR or seperately by recorded delivery

Once you ask for the CCA if they don't provide it within 12+2 days you can then send the account in dispute letter until such time as they do provide it.

If they do supply it post it on here minus personnel info and ask for help as to enforceability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll ignore 1st credit for now then till get a response to SAR from Lloyds. If Lloyds can't provide a signed credit agreement and/or evidence of assigniing the debt to 1st Credit will that should be enough to tell 1st Credit where to go??

 

Post back if you get anymore calls or letters from 1st crud please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice everyone. I'm not trying to shirk this debt at all..it should be shared with my ex but he did a moonlight flit to the States but as it was in my name there's nowt I can do about it. and by my calculations I've paid more than my half share of it back! Good luck to others out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a last question for now - am I definately best SARing Lloyds instead of 1st Credit? (baring in mind I've not had any dealings with Lloyds since 1998) Would I not be opening up and old wound, so to speak, if I contact Lloyds? I don't even know my account numbers or anything!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE:

Haven't gotten round to SARing TSB yet. Had the limited time offer of reduced settlement figure letter off Ist Crud.(sent 27th July, arrived 31st..offer valid for July only haha)

Today I got their 'we now intend to take legal proceedings against you which may result in legal costs, name in register of judgments....

 

Can a debt that has already been through a CCJ go through one again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice everyone. I'm not trying to shirk this debt at all..it should be shared with my ex but he did a moonlight flit to the States but as it was in my name there's nowt I can do about it. and by my calculations I've paid more than my half share of it back! Good luck to others out there

 

Standard letter may etc

 

 

Please be assured, what ever you do with 1st credit, is ok by us.

 

Also we know that you are not trying to shirk your debts.

 

Keep us posted. god bless

 

the very best regards lilly and sleep well

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...