Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update! I have now opened the mail from Barclaycard. I am assuming that their letters were prompted by my confirmation to them of my change of address, which I had advised them of twice. They are treating my change of address notification as a "General Data Protection Regulation Right of Access Request"  and state that I have made a "Right of Access Request. They are asking me to provide valid indentity documents! I have made no such request and am minded to ignore their request for extra information? I should add that their letters were sent to my correct current address!
    • Are you allowed to appeal if you plead guilty?   I know you appeal the sentence, but the criminal record formed from your guilt would surely remain?   I'm not sure if your able to appeal a crimianl record if you plead guilty are you?
    • DX: I did not pursue Link after I got the CCJ amended to monthly payments. Pretty sure the CCJ does not mention reviews, I do have the CCJ somewhere, I will have to look it up in storage. It is as mentioned on the thread you referenced  in your post #28. The Barclays loan was taken out in September 2004 for 60 months! Current Balance remaining approx £2K. On checking back my past correspondence with Barclaycard about this loan, there was a history of them ignoring my letters and offers to pay, and I even had problems in obtaining their bank account details for them to accept my payments! I have received strange correspondence from them too, one referring to insurance which I did not have. They seem very disorganised! Barclaycard told me to pay "Masterloan" a while back and I now receive regular statements and arrears notices from "Personal Loans from Barclaycard" clearly marked Masterloan, they changed the account reference number! I have never requested a CCA on this account. I advised them of my change of address last September, but they are still sending, until today, statements etc. to my old address! I have received 2 letters from Barclaycard Loan today though, not opened them yet!!
    • Yes, a few months ago. They wrote back saying there was no CCA and the debt was unenforcable. I then started gtting bombarded with threatening emails from their 'litigations team' which have been sent to spam. I've now recieved the letter before claim with the PAP form enclosed, but still no CCA or even a letter from them to say the debt is deemed enforcable. Thank you.
    • That's a shame but not unexpected.  I'm not sure about your assumed  questions because I haven't been to court but I'm not sure about not accepting a criminal record. It could be a language thing but it isn't your choice unfortunately.  HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mcs demand from beyond the grave


Barbarawoo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

Basicly I ran a credit card debt up and was pursued by a company called CapQuest, balance was £3617 and I agreed a setlement figure of £2500, saving £617.

 

The above account was settled and closed in July last year but back in June this year I recieved a demand from Mcs for £617, I rang them and told them it had been settled but all they would say is they have no other info other than that i owe HSBS this amount.

 

Rang HSBC but they were usless, had no info to provide and just deal with Mcs, went round in circles.

 

Wrote to Mcs and explained that it had all been settled with CapQuest in July 08 but only response I got was a letter saying they were going to pass it over to DG solicitors and claim against my house.

 

Sent anotther letter putting monies owed in dispute along with request for CCA and breakdown of debt owed with postal order for good measure.

 

I contacted CapQuest and they sent me a letter of satisfaction, debt settled and account closed, all be it dated July this year, said letter is winging it's way to Mcs by recordered delivery.

 

Just wondered if there are any thoughts as to why I would have had no corrispondance for almost a year from HSBC and now this?

 

Thank you for a great site, has been most helpfull in my communication with Mcs.

 

Cheers...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi barbarawoo , welcome (back?) to the forum :)

 

If you have incontestible proof that this was settled , let MCS do their worst . They are only a collection branch of HSBC , not a proper DCA - and all this huffing and puffing about claims against your house is designed to scare you into coughing up money which you do not owe. They can't put a claim on your house without going to court , and they won't go there - because they'd lose big -time .....

 

If they persist after you have your latest submission , report them to the Financial Ombudsman for harassment and unfair practice .

 

Come back if you need more info ,or if they're still playing silly beggars and we can put together a letter for you to wipe the floor with them................ :D

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally , DG solicitors only work for HSBC , like MCS - they are in-house and pretty pathetic IMHO .:cool:

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Metro and DG work out of the same office block in Edgebaston, Birmingham. I would be supprised if there was any more than a flimsy office partition between these two "companies"... if that :rolleyes:.

 

If Capquest have confirmed your agreement then you have nothing to worry about from the bully boy tactics od Metro, they arnt very good at it anyway lol

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Barb,

 

I think what may have happened here is you have fallen into the trap.

 

I bet the offer from Capquest was in PARTIAL settlement.

 

They have had the meat from the bone and have thrown the bone to the dogs.

 

Shame you paid these parasites anything.

 

Would there be any unfair charges you could reclaim on the account?

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

full wording on the letter from CapQust is as follows...

 

Dear Barbaraxxxxx

Account Number: xxxxxxxx

Balance: £0.00

 

We thank you for your payment.

 

I can confirm that your account is now settled and closed. As the amnount paid to settle your account was less than the full oustanding balance, your credit file will show your balance as satisfied with a special flag of partial settlement.

 

Yours sincerley

 

Does this alter things? and thanks for taking the time to reply...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it makes a huge difference.

 

The account is settled for Capquest, as I said, they have had more than enough from you. They have probably returned the rest of the account.

 

If you have charges on the account, I cannot urge you enough to reclaim them. It's simple and very rewarding :D

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well lets hope MCS accept the letter of satisfaction, maybe they will be too busy with so many peeps from this forum tying them up in knots :)

 

Account with HSBC no longer active, can I still claim?

 

I will be sending the following to them along with a £10 postal order:

 

[iNSERT TODAY’S DATE]

[iNSERT YOUR HOME ADDRESS]

[iNSERT THE NAME OF YOUR CREDIT CARD COMPANY]

[iNSERT THE ADDRESS OF CREDIT CARD COMPANY]

Re: Account number [iNSERT YOUR CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT NUMBER]

Dear Sir/Madam,

I request that [iNSERT THE NAME OF YOUR CREDIT CARD COMPANY] provides me with details of all default charges - arising from exceeding my credit limit, not paying on time, or not honouring a payment - I have paid in the last six years.

I understand that [iNSERT THE NAME OF YOUR CREDIT CARD COMPANY] is obliged to provide this information under the Data Protection Act 1998.

I look forward to hearing from you within 40 days.

Yours faithfully

[sIGN YOUR NAME]

[TYPE YOUR NAME]

 

This ok?

 

Many thanks....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Account with HSBC no longer active, can I still claim?

 

Yes , no problem barbarawoo....... if there are unlawful charges on it , start getting the ball rolling to claim them back .....

 

I take it we're talking about the Credit Card Account here ?- if so , that's not affected by the OFT Test case so just carry on and best of luck .........

 

And of course , if you're in doubt about how to proceed - you know where to come and ask ..... lol :D

 

BTW - I liked that light relief link ....... a good laugh! :lol:

 

 

Just amended one word JM ;-) I'm sure you meant to say unlawful ;-)

You're right saintly - I did ..... thanks . ;-) :D

Edited by johnnymitch

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone, hope your all well.

 

Update of my case/problem?

 

Recieved a letter from MCS dated 4th August, delivered 7th August and reads as follows:

 

Dear MS you owe us money please paye up,

Thank you for your recent correspndence, dated 23rd July 2009, the contents of which have been noted.

 

Please be advised that matters will be held in abeyance pending our receipt of the satisfaction notice from Capquest. Once we have recieved this, we will refer back to our client.

 

We trust this clarifies matter.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Signiture unreadable

 

No mention of my request for the copy of CCA?

 

No mention of my request for the following:

A validation of debt with complete breakdown of what is claimed to be outstanding

An assignment of debt letter authorising you to pursue the disputed monies

My letter was dated to them on the 23rd July, they recieved it on 27th July, Monday after the weekend it was sent from Friday.

Whats next? what date do they have til to respond to my CCA request?

As an aside, my husband told me this joke:

A sheikn has 3 sons, on the eldest sons 14th birthday he asked him what he wanted, the boy says a car set, so the sheikn buys him Jaguar motors.

The next son reaches age 14 and the sheikn asks him what he wants, the boy says, I want a train set so the father buys him Great Northern Railways.

The 3rd son reaches 14 and the sheikn asks what he wants, the boy says a cowboy outfit, so the sheikn buys him Metropolitan Collection Services :):p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly should be by then barbarawoo - they've got 12+2 days to produce before they're in default......

 

btw , I liked the joke .... :D

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

not recieved anything else from MCS since their last letter as posted, nothing regarding my request for the following:

 

Copy of CCA, £1.00 postal order enclosed

 

A validation of debt with complete breakdown of what is claimed to be outstanding

 

An assignment of debt letter authorising you to pursue the disputed monies

 

I am in the process of drafting my next letter to them and will post before sending via Recorded Delivery for any sugestions.

 

My husband has found the following the following sound/video and thought this might be useful to hear, it basicly brings everything together that is posted on this site, slightly humourous but does contain some swearing.

 

Please delete if you feel it is not appropiate.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBUfVaTPGrI&feature=related Part 1

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZc8AXzz4gA&feature=related Part 2

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtWwvqnN7QM&feature=related Part 3

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...