Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Robinson Way CCJ/CO Cap1 card debt - was unable to respond - now want to set aside **LOST** - appealed - **WON** Claim reset - **WON - Case dismissed**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4686 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just joined a nd new so excuse way ignorance. Long story but basically.

 

1. Credit card debt Cap 1

2. Correspondence out of blue from Robinson Way("RW") 01/2009.

3. Letter sent asking who they were 30/01/09 and what capacity they were writing to me. No reply.

4. Letter recd from RW saying home visit 01/02/09.

5. Claim form recd 20/03/09.

6. Was unable to deal with this in proper way as at time was caring for my mother who was later stages of cancer. (Lack of sleep for weeks, stressed and upset at what was happening with mother. She passed away 12/04/09/

7. Assumed this was cap 1 taking action so sent admission and req time to pay.

8. they ignorred this and went to default judgment.

9. Phoned who I thought was solicitors acting for them (Horwich Farrelly) pointed out what had happened. They confirmed they had request for time to pay and confirmed they ignorred it.

10. App to have judgment set aside as they had not followed court rules therefore Irregular Default Judgment.

11. After making above app. RW changed solicitors and obtained interim charging order.

12. Both app to set aside and charging order listed for same time.

 

Charging order was not expected and need some advice and guidance as what to do next. I believe that they have not acted fairly in the way they have dealt with this and feel that they have failed in many ways and that the Unfair Relationships Test applies.

 

Will expand further but need some help please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 518
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have put in an application to set aside a default judgment. Have received date for hearing. However after looking through threads in cag I need to expand on my statement of case and evidence. Can some someone help me with the actusal process of expanding my statement of cas and evidence. ie

 

1. Can I just do it by letter or should it be more formal.

2. If more formal do I need to make an application to the court with a fee payable.

3. Are there time limits in doing this.

4. Since putting in an application to set aside, claimant Robinson Way, have applied for a charging order. Advice on how to deal with this is needed, or should I deal with this in another thread?

 

Help please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Robin,

.when was the judgment u r trying to set aside?

.why was it a default judgment?

.presumablty its on a CCA1974 regulated account?

.what were the POC particulars of claim? do u have the original claim form and from which court was it issued?

.did u ever return anth with the claim form i.e admission of debt/defence.,etc?

.depending on some of the above, it may be advisable to prepare a defence and skeleton argument in support of your application in which u can show a DJ that u could have successfully defended.

.again depending on when they are with the charging order, you may be better off asking the court in question to hear that along with your set aside as it is directly dependant on that outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi R&B

 

default judgment 05/2009. I believe I wrongly admitted claim & returned to sols asking time to pay. They ignorred this and just obtained default judgment.

 

Only admitted as not able to think straight at time as looking after mother with cancer who p[assed away within couple weeks of all this (emotional times and very little sleep)

 

Reason to set aside on app made on grounds claimant didn't follow CPR 14.10 and asked that it be set aside in accordance with cPR 13.2 or 13.3.

 

Since doing this I discovered CAG and have been looking through threads and believe I need to also show that I could have reasonably defended. I believe I could.

 

Hearing has been set and charging order set for same date and time.

 

More advice please as very confused with proceedures etc

 

Sorry, yes it is a CCA1974 account

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi robin,

is it definitely a Default Judgment does it actually have that at the head of the paperwork from the court? if u adnmitted the claim i dont believe that would be the case as it is essentially a form of defence (so explained by a DJ to me !!) and becomes a judgment under admission.

couple of threads to read regarding your predicament if its not a Default Judgment.

 

1 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/192275-ccj-interest-debt.html

2 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/123971-ccj-set-aside-help.html

3 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/182436-mint-cca-enforcable.html

4 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/180864-finding-faulty-cca-agreements.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Robin,

 

Yes definately a Judgment in default. I have proof of posting and confirmation of receipt. Sols were Horwich Farrelly and I also phoned them after I recieved default judgment pointing out that they had not followed CPR's. They basically said that was tough and agreed that they had not dealt with request for time to pay.

 

Further thoughts appreciated as I believe that they have ignored throughoout proper procedures and rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do u have any paperwork in regard to the debt CA/DN/TN/etc? if not have u done any requests for them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

request for CA sent last week according to CCA S78 enclosing £1 po. but requested informally first time Jan 09. First I heard from Roninson Way was end Dec 08. They didn't say who they ere or what capacity writing. Feel they have deliberately tried to mislead all along.

 

Could'nt get head round this properly until now dure to caring for mum with her cancer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi robin,

really sorry to hear about ur mum. when is ur hearing?

maybe look to do a SAR if £10 is not a problem, they get 40 days to reply but it may come earlier and cud be useful in the future if matters are not settled completely at teh hearing, send it to the original creditors regstd address. also have a read up on the following thread regarding getting disclosure within proceedings, u can set ur own timescales as long as they are reasonable (7 days if u are in a hurry):

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/159445-getting-them-reveal-their.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi R&B Your advice has been brilliant & I will look up how to do a Subject Access Request properly and look at other thread.

 

Still bit confused at correct way to present all this to court. Can the basis for setting aside be done by letter to court and claimant? and also is the fact claimant didn't follow CPR's and obtained what I've now found to be called an irregular default judgment be set aside because they did'nt follow CPR's

 

I really appreciate yr time. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

have u submitted the N244? i thought u had submitted ur application?

 

added: palomino has a SAR template post 14 here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/192486-court-claim-o-draft.html

send £10 postal order if poss and dont sign anth at all....

 

regstd addresses:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31052-contact-details-banks-j.html

Edited by r&b
added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes already submitted N244 with main reason for setting aside breach of CPR's on receipt of admission & req time to pay. however,since looking here think I need to expand on reason for originally putting in admission with req for time to pay and demonstrate that I think I could sucessfully defend.

 

Very messy and trying to turn back clock to defend this and that at time POC recd and app to set aside put in I was not able to deal with this properly in view of family problems stated earlier.

 

Just think that in interests of justice I should be able to deal with this.

 

Thanx for the links etc. Researching them as we speak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do u have a hearing date for the set aside?

 

the procedure would be u putting ur case to the DJ at the hearing as will the other side. he will either decide one way or the other there and then or may wish to hear more and give directions for a further hearing (hence the SAR) so as i said above it may be useful to have a defence and supporting skeleton argument ready.

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of time then to get the docs etc... ive got to disappear now so im hopeful others will join in and give their point of view..

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're going to be busy - Firstly you must try to get the CCJ set aside and then the Charging Order will be dismissed.

 

Get the SAR request off as well if not done already.

 

Have a read of these links on Charging Orders just in case -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/203298-guide-charging-orders-orders.html

 

Have a look at the links below on Charging Orders and what grounds you may oppose them -

 

Insolvency Helpline

National Debtline

and this gem of a post ( Courtesy of FunkyFox ) -

 

FunkyFox post

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi supa

Yes seems lot to do. Still need an answer on question of being successful in getting judgmnet set aside as claimant ignorred fact that they had an admission and req for time to pay in time. All can be proven with proof of posting and delivery (also confirmed by sols)

 

Putting together Subject Access Request now and also CPR 31.14 for copy of CA (only doc mentioned in POC)

 

Help with advice on this needed at this time

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would try to make as little of the admission as possible myself (personal experience...lol), but if u have had legal advice then assuming u are happy with that, u must follow it (do they specialise in this field?). i would also concentrate on the fact its a default judgment and what that allows under part13 to set aside, of which u are already aware. hopefully there will be more informed input here.

 

on the disclosure front (i think 31.14 is correct as u are in proceedings), i would ask for a copy of the original CA, a copy of the original Default Notice and proof of Termination of the account, along with statements of the whole account to prove the sums claimed (this will eke out any charges). if the debt is not with the original creditor you also require Notice of Assignment of the debt. all of these are required to lawfully enforce the claim. i would suggest giving them 14 days in which to reply to the 31.14 as u have some time until the hearing, this will leave ample time to send out reminders if their 'in tray' gets a little muddled, which is very common;)

unless anyone has another avenue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for additional advice. Have been putting together 31.14 and sar to original creditor. Is my interpretation correct of 31.14 that I can only ask for a copy of the original CA as that is all they have relied upon in poc, or should I include request for other docs as well.

 

 just to clarify point on SAR. Am i correct that it should be sent to original creditor even though it appears debt may have been assigned?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi robin,

i believe strictly speaking, that is correct. if u were answering the original claim u would only ask for what was on the POC.

SAR goes to original creditor, however u can also SAR the DCA as this may throw up details of assignment, etc. it is another £10 fee tho. have u had any Notice of Assignment?

have a check who the claimant is on the original claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did send 31.14 yesterday and did ask for all docs you mentioned. Thought what the hell nothing to lose.

Its pretty confusing with POC as the events were as follows:

1. First contact from RobinWay end 12/08 to Occupier asking details of occupier etc as mail returned "Gone away" I ignorred this.

2. Mid 01/09 letter from RW headed formal demand due to "ROBINSON WAY EX CAPITAL ONE".

3. Letter to RW asking who they were and why writing to me and asked for a copy of credit agreement. They inorred this.

4. Letter from RW beginning 02/09. "Appointment for home visit" again money due to "ROBINSON WAY EX CAPITAL ONE".

5. Claim Form received. Calimant "ROBINSON WAY & CO LTD (ASSIGNEES OF EX R/O: CAPITAL ONE).

 

It goes on from there, but all through they have been deceitful and tried to mislead me. All at a time I was unable to deal with it as looking after my mother. But, no Notice of Assignment, Default notice or anything else received. Just as listed above.

 

Because of all this, despite my admission and request for time to pay, which they ignorred and went for default judgment hence not following CPR's, I believe that in accordance with S140A to 140C of CCA 1974 the "Unfair Relationships Test" applies.

 

any comments of this line or otherwise also greatly appreciated.

 

31.14 request posted as amended. Comments greatly appreciated

Re: ROBINSON WAY & COMPANY LTD v ROBINWAYROBINME

CPR 31.14 Request

 

I received the Claim Form issued on XX March 2009 in this case out of the XXXXX County Court with Judgment by Default on XXX May 2009. The proceedings were transferred to XXXXX County Court on XX June 2009.

 

I have applied to have judgment set aside as it is my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request was ignored.

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of the original document mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1. the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2. the assignment.

 

3. the default notice.

 

4. the termination notice.

 

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the documents I have requested are copied to and received by me within 14 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the original of the document I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any versions to include an obligation to recover and preserve such versions which are now in the possession of a third party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good to me, Robin:)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...