Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice Please On Starting A Claim For Bank Charges


middenmess
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5379 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Opened First Direct Account in 1991 and have always had a £1000 agreed overdraft on it.

 

I have kept all of my statements from 1997 to date and have gone through them and have 35 charges over those years totalling c£1200 for exceeding the £1000 limit.

 

Whenever I've gone over my limit it has only ever been for a few days before I've returned it to below my agreed limit.

 

So my questions are..

 

Is it recommended that I just work out 8% interest on each of these fees from the dates [1997-2009] that they were charged to my account as I can't understand how compound interest would apply or be much more beneficial to my claim as sometimes the limit was only exceeded by a day.

 

I assume that I notify the bank that I wish to reclaim these charges together with a detailed schedule adding on the 8% [or do I omit the interest at this time?]

 

When the Bank responds quoting they are waiting on the OFT case to be decided,does that register my claim or do I then have to file my claim at court and receive official notice that it has been stayed.

 

Will going back to 1997 affect the way in which the claim is dealt with by the Bank--I'll rely on the fact that I've only just found out about my rights to reclaim these unlawful charges?

 

Anything else I should do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading through some of the threads on the FD forum it would appear that one of FD's spiteful responses to a request to pay back charges is to close down the account. [Charges I'd be claiming +8% would be more than double what my O/D is at present]

 

Should I be concerned by this possibility as I have my mortgage and a number of other payments set up on it with DD's and a much used debit card.

 

Should also mention that I pay them £10pm most months for the use of my account.

 

My credit rating was trashed by Barclays several years ago when I was a month late in clearing my business O/D when it was demanded back.[marked as 'satisfied' on credit report but they refuse to remove it, and by O2 for disputed £20 odd! ] so I might have problems opening a new account elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - me too?!

 

I'm probably being dumb, but can any one help us by pointing us to a dummies guide to starting the claim process please

 

Hi Paul--it's looking unlikely as we appear to be on the 'Billy No Mates' forum here:)

 

But I can start you off although there are plenty of threads on the other bank forums that point you in the right direction.

 

 

If you've got all of your statements then you can make a start by identifying ,dating and listing all of the unlawful charges.

 

[if you haven't got the statements then make a Subject Access Request to the Bank together with the charge of £10 and within 40 days you should receive all the data that the bank holds on you including all your statements.]

 

Your list of charges will look prettier and more professional on one of the spreadsheets available from the Bank Templates Library.

 

There is also a template letter there which you send to the bank requesting them to repay your money back to you.

 

By the time you've done that there should be some advice from knowledgable caggers as to what the next step is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MM,

 

Looking in as asked.

 

Have you read the Interest Tutorial at Link No6 in my sig're below. This should deal with most Q's about interest.

 

Re the possibility of them closing the a/c, I can't comment on how likely this may be. However, see if you can set up another a/c elsewhere first, before you embark on the claiming process.

 

When you send off your Prelim Claim letter and LBA, hide the s.69 Int't figures on the SOC. You can only claim s.69 Int't when you file at court.

 

Re the test case, yes this will mean your case gets Stayed. However, you should file your claim as soon as the LBA's 14 days expires. As you have data going back beyond the normal 6 years, you'll rely upon s.32 Limitation Act 1980 to claim the older amounts.

 

I don't see the relevance of your paying £10 a month for your a/c (sometimes :confused: ).

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...