Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5385 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I will try and keep this quick.

I just recieved a phone call from a friend to say that two bailiffs went round to his place of residence and litterally thew him out of the property and on the streets rendering him homeless. they then proceeded to change the locks and boarded up the property.

He later found out that his landlord had had the property reposessed via the courts and the landlord had failed to tell him that this was happening. My friend cannot get back into the property to get his belongings, not even a change of clothing, he has managed to get into an urgent shelter that has been provided by the local council which is something but has only the clothes on his back that he was wearing when the bailiffs turfed him out. Does any one know the proceedure of getting his property back. This happened two days ago and needs his belongings. The morgage company dont want to know and have said it is in the hands of the bailiffs now. Have to say that he assaulyted one of them as he didnt know who or what they were at the time. any suggestions would be gratefully apriciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have alerted the site team for you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some initial advice is to contact the police. Presumably the bailiffs are not allowed to hostage your friends property ie clothes, etc.

 

I wonder if it might be an idea to phone one of the Debt Counselling agencies, either Natinal Debtline, or CAB. They might be able to offer some advice.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some initial advice is to contact the police. Presumably the bailiffs are not allowed to hostage your friends property ie clothes, etc.

 

I wonder if it might be an idea to phone one of the Debt Counselling agencies, either Natinal Debtline, or CAB. They might be able to offer some advice.

As always the police do not want to know, its classed as a 'cival' matter. I have packed him off to the CAB now and hopefully they may be able to advise him of his rights to his own property.

I cannot see how they can do this, surely this is ilegal in some form, he is in fact a sitting tennant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I have been doing a little bit of digging about for info. Bailiffs can remove tennants from a property and give as little as 20 mins notice, so wrong how can the law allow this..... But the bailiffs have to give the tennant a time and date where he/she can come back and remove their personal belongings and if I am reading this correctly the time period is within a week.

These particular bailiffs didnt do this. I cant understand how the law can do this to people. he has paid his rent on time paid bills, been a good tenant and a law abiding citizen and out of the blue two big burly men come and wrench you out of your home leaving you with just the clothes you stand in without warning, and they wonder why the man was upset and angry. Their should be a law to protect tennants like this, why isnt there?????? this man has been left with nothing but a possible record for assault.. just goes to show yet again the bailiff are born with no heart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This from a housing repossessions site (I'm afraid I can't verify the legal position of the content):

 

***

 

Sadly it is not uncommon for tenants to find that, although they have been paying the rent, the landlord has not been using the money to pay the mortgage

 

Buy-to-Let Mortgages

 

Borrowers intending to rent out a property should obtain a buy-to-let mortgage. These often have slightly different conditions to ordinary mortgages. Some buy-to-let mortgages require the landlord to obtain written authority from the lender for each tenant. If a landlord falls into arrears on their mortgage the lender can start repossession proceedings in the usual way. There is almost no requirement that tenants be given notice that the lender intends to repossess. Indeed the Data Protection Act means that the lender is prevented from discussing the mortgage with tenants.

The only warning that a tenant is bound to receive will be the “Notice to Occupier”. This is a letter that lenders must send to the property at least two weeks before a possession hearing. It will be addressed to “The Occupier” and give the names of the parties involved – i.e. the lender and the landlord –and the date, time and location of the possession hearing. It may also contain the landlord’s address. Unfortunately, this letter is not always opened as people often think that something addressed to “The Occupier” is just junk mail.

 

Repossession Hearings

 

The lender’s representative will probably refuse to discuss the mortgage with any tenants who come to court. Technically, as tenants are neither party to the mortgage nor the case, they are not allowed into the hearing. However, many judges will allow tenants to attend as they tend to be very sympathetic to people in this situation. Despite this, there is little a tenant can say to influence the outcome. The judge’s order is likely to depend solely on the landlord’s circumstances and whether any proposals are made by him to clear the arrears.

After Repossession

 

If a tenanted property is repossessed, and either the lender has given authority for a tenant or no specific authority was needed, the lender should appoint a receiver who will then collect rent from the tenants. However, this does not necessarily mean that the tenants will be allowed to stay in the property indefinitely. The lender is entitled to evict the tenant after giving as little as two months’ notice. The lender can then start proceedings to obtain a possession order, which is likely to give the tenants only 14 days to leave the property.

 

Mortgages which are not Buy-to-Let

 

If a landlord has an ordinary mortgage, any tenants in the property will be unauthorised unless the lender subsequently consents to the property being let. These tenants will have even less protection from repossession. If the property is repossessed the lender will not need a possession order to evict the tenants as they are not lawfully in the property. If the tenants refuse to leave, the lender may be able to evict them as trespassers, which can be done through the court in a matter of days. Any unauthorised tenant who learns that a possession order has been made should immediately start looking for alternative accommodation. Tenants often ask why the lender will not accept payments from them directly. If a lender accepts rent payments from an unauthorised tenant, they may be deemed to have recognised the legitimacy of the tenancy. The lender may then be legally obliged to allow the tenant to stay, making it more difficult for them to sell the property to cover the mortgage debt.

 

Tenants Wishing to Buy the Property

 

Lenders cannot discuss the mortgage with the tenants, nor can they enter into an agreement to sell the property to them. Lenders have a duty to get the best price they can for the property and to do this it will have to be openly marketed. A tenant could buy the property at that stage but, by then, they will probably already have been evicted.

Tenancy Agreements Pre-dating the Mortgage

 

If a tenant was in the property before the mortgage was taken out, it is possible that their right to stay will supersede the right of the lender to repossess it. This is a complicated area of law and will probably depend on a number of factors. Tenants who find themselves in this situation should immediately take independent advice from one of the free advisory bodies specialising in housing matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for that info T2upNorth.

Unfortunately for my friend he was letting this property from some one who did not Buy to rent and failed to inform her morgage provider, so he was not informed that the house was being reposessed. What sadens me is that he has lived in this property for 4 or more years. This was his home and it was taken from him in a matters of minutes, he isnt a young chap where he can start over easily, he is getting on in years and is claiming benefits so its hard for him to get the monies to get together a deposit for a home either by renting or buying. He has gone from a 2 bed home to just a dingy room with nothing but the clothes he stands up in. And the morgage company dosnt give a damn, shame on them, shame on the courts the landlord the poilce and the bailiffs. All he is guilty of is not asking if the landlord had permission to rent out the property. I have rented properties for most of my adult life and not once have I ever asked that question to a landlord. he just wants his belongings back so he can find a home. I am concerned now though for his state of mental health and what this has done to him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is without question a terrible situation for your friend to find himself in. Hopefully, CAB will be able to help out.

 

Shelter might also be another agency to contact. Please keep us updated on this.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...