Jump to content


Egg card [OH's 2nd card] Microfiche agreement - now Marlin


beachcomber60
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3192 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After much letter writing the OH finally received a reply to her second Egg card cca request.

 

Apart from the 'agreement' stating the 'Approved' limit as opposed to the correct prescribed term 'Credit limit', the agreement they have sent is a photocopy of a microfiche slide.

 

Can this be classed an enforceable agreement as it can clearly be read (leaving the approved limit aside), it dates from c.2001.

 

As always

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Beachcomber, have a look at the link below where PT2537 outlines what he thinks is wrong with Egg Card Agreements. He is highly qualified in the field of litigation. This should give you more pointers to throw at them.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/188093-egg-credit-agreements-what.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Beachy,

 

Yes good post above, and if it ever went to court you can use the Civil Evidence act 1995 to make them prove its authenticity.

 

Have a look at this by Alanalana

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/162535-documents-court-civil-evidence.html#post1743527

 

Regards

 

PF

If I have been of help to you please feel free to click my scales to the left Thanks.:)

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is what I have learnt here and offered as a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

 

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 

CARTER V Co-Op

BANK CHARGES

REFUNDED £3567

 

POMPEYFAITH V Co-Op PPI

OFFER MADE BUT REFUSED

ONGOING AND STILL ONGOING

NOW WITH THE OMBUDSMAN

 

R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i dont think if law correctly applied they should be able to get away with Microfilch copies!

 

As you say when it suits them bankers will say a copy will do when trying to harrass someone into paying an unenforcabe agreement but they soon change their tune and say a copy will not do when it comes to anything else concerning their banking,

 

As i saw on another forum this point was made

- A copy birth certificate is unacceptable to obtain a pass port and driving licence.

A copy of divorce papers is not acceptable to obtain a passport or driving licence ,

A copy of land deeds are not acceptable as proof of ownership of land

you cant send a copy of your driving license to prove you passed your test even if you swear on oath to say you have passed it.

 

You must produce the original,

 

So why should this be any different for something as important as a credit agreement? .

It can be argued on this basis that a copy of an agreement is not acceptable as proof of a debt

!so this argument can be brought out in court as well and which i will be doing

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/131345-getting-mbna-before-they-5.html This thread of BRW goes over some useful points when banks try and rely on microfilch copies!

  • Haha 1

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aso as that thread pointed out banks are very reluctant to accept faxed copies of documents themselves so why should it be differennt for us!

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love it sunflower

 

I will find your thread and read it with interest.

Surely a microfilch could be acceptable in certain circumstances?

Don't get me wrong I dare not disagree with that statement.

 

Pedross

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pedross!

It is Bankerrhymeswith thred! I find his threads very informative and helpful!:) really under a credtit card agreement it is wrong to accept a microfilch copy,and is backed up by the fact that under cpr 16 paragraph 7.3 the crediter is compelled to being original into court.Plus it can be pointed out that bankers themselves dont accept faxed copies of documents! so why should it be different for us:) plus the other points i raised.

 

Also another quote taken from a thread -Also if you read the Wilson v First Counties Trust it says in this ruling and says specifically " a document" signed by the debtor NOT a "copy" of a document signed by the debtor... and as everyone knows a comma can make a difference to the meaning of a sentence and especially in law and this is very significant.

Quote from Wilson case- IN effect- the crediter - by failing to ensure that he obtained a document signed by the debtor which contained all the prescribed terms -must (in the light of the provisions in section 65(1) and 127(3) of the 1974 Act) be taken to have made a voluntary disposition,or gift , of the loan monies to the debtor,The crediter had chosen to part with the monies in circumstances in which it was never entitled to have them repaid.

The conclusion to be drawn from this quote is case law and consumer law meant - A "Document" signed by the debtor containing all the prescribed terms", not a copy.If you have not got the document you not got an agreement.

Edited by sunflower99

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i am going to use those arguments in court!:)

 

Also as that thread pointed out banks are very reluctant to accept faxed copies of documents themselves so why should it be differennt for us!:)

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Egg said they sent sent me two documents, A and B. A is 'a copy of the original agreement, and B is the current terms and conditions'. But there were three unlabelled documents - a copy of a signed dated, Egg card agreement (probably a microfiche), and two photocopies (unsigned, undated, and clearly not of the same provenance as the Egg Card Agreement) headed ' Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974'. They've still not told me which is 'original' and 'current'. Also, the Egg agreement refers to signing and returning the credit agreement - which from their letter, must be one of the other two documents. Direct Credit Collections has given up, Egg've just moved it on to ARC.

 

The Egg Card Agreement also says it's not valid until they've carried out their final credit checks - my recent Subject Access Request shows no sign of checks ever being carried out. Egg also never replied to my letters last summer saying they hadn't answered my letter regarding the 'agreements', and that if they didn't reply with four weeks, then they were agreeing by default that they had no agreement and would set the balance on the account at 0 and remove any negative references to credit agencies etc. The SAR shows they received these letters and did nothing. Also no record of notifications of changes to the credit limit, or any credit checks ever - breaches the banking code, and some of the terms and conditions. No sign of any notification of change of interest rates in the documentation either. Egg don't seem to realise they need to keep records...

Wonder how long it'll take to get ARC off the case?

Oh, and the Financial Ombudsman Service is a waste of space.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

My partner had an Egg card which defaulted in 2008, been chasing Egg for the agreement but received nothing so it's been very quiet no contact no payments & no demands for payment.

 

About 12-18 months ago partner received email from Egg stating Barclaycard was to take over Egg accounts, shortly after a letter arrived from Barclaycard with a completely different account number, just stating that they now have the Egg accounts & that payments should continue to be made to Egg until further notice.

 

Have not heard anything further until today when a letter arrived from Marlin Capital Europe stating they are collecting on behalf of Barclaycard & my partner should telephone them to discuss payment options.

 

Apart from the balance outstanding is the same as the defaulted Egg card account the Barclaycard account number is completely different, my partner is quite worried as we have a joint account with Barclays.

 

Surely the Egg & Barclaycard account number should be the same, unless a new agreement had been sent/signed (which it hasn't).

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them the prove it letter, you can legitimately say you have no knowledge of this and wait to see what they come back with.

Have you had a letter from barclaycard or marlin, if it's from barclaycard i'd wait until marlin contact you then send it.

Marlin are idjits, you need to keep the pressure on them.

 

Also see: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?215961-EGG-gt-gt-A-Quandry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a CCA request. If they cant produce one, they cant enforce the debt. Since Egg were in default already, you could tell marlin and sharkleys where to go.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it stil on your cra file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then i wouldn't even bother with the CCA to marlin

they cant fo anything they dont OWN the debt.

 

i'd be more concerned about offset by BC from your joint account.

 

there is little chance BC will have the EGG CCA

 

i'd CCA them IF you must fo anything

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then i wouldn't even bother with the CCA to marlin

they cant fo anything they dont OWN the debt.

 

i'd be more concerned about offset by BC from your joint account.

 

there is little chance BC will have the EGG CCA

 

i'd CCA them IF you must fo anything

.

dx

 

I'll double check the letter from Marlins to my partner as to whether they are collecting agents or its been assigned.

 

Can Barclays 'raid' a joint account where I am first named account holder? I dont owe Barclays a penny (now :) )

Link to post
Share on other sites

if BC show on the CRa file they own it beachy.

 

yes they could offset this. becareful

 

is this the 1st or 2nd egg card

 

looking at your old threads.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its the second card, other card is with Apex, they've failed to provided the cca & written to the other half stating that no further payments need be made until such times as the agreement can be provided - strangly enough they've aldo removed the DN.

 

(Haven't been around for a long time - health issues).

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea good to see you back

 

 

 

i'm thinking for history it might be an idea to merge this with the other threads on this card.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont worry about marlin they are lowlife

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont worry about marlin they are lowlife

 

dx

 

Have just checked the letter OH received yesterday, it is an assignment letter from Barclaycard to Marlin, also states that the default on the CRA will change from BC to Marlins name.

 

OH seems to think theres PPI on this card (original account number with Egg) & knows for sure there are late/overlimit charges - Does OH chase EGG for these? Have never acknowledged any letter from BC as they always refer to a different account number.

 

Also been reading about defaults being removed due to late payments & PPI making DN inaccurate - is this now possible?

 

Got lots of catching up to do, fallen way behind :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Egg card [OH's 2nd card] Microfiche agreement - now Marlin
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...