Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
    • I would say You should accept it - I HIGHLY doubt you will  be able to claim for letters at trial ans they’re offering you that, which is higher monetary value than interest.   Also they raise a good point, getting interest at anything above 4% is lucky these days, yes judges give it, but rarily above 4%   Also you might find depending on the judge  you don’t get some costs if you take it all the way over £7.40 when court woukdnt award letters costs and thus meaning their award would be less than evris offer which was made    Up to you though but the wait will be 3-4mo for a trial date at least
    • Hi Folks, Been 162 days! Just by way of update. Today I received a text from Opos Ltd so no doubt Capquest are renting the debt out to anybody who fancies a nibble. Safe to say I will not be responding.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shop Direct - Distance Selling Regs non compliance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just wanted to find out if anyone else experiences this issue I filled with the OFT and Trading Standards on Friday.

 

It seems Littlewoods do not refund the postage charge if you reject the goods within the 7 days period under DSR and that they only refund the charge if you find that the goods are faulty.

 

I telephoned to see why they don't comply, as per usual you deal with some call centre monkey.

 

Nevertheless I can only image the quantity of items rejected by people and postage being non refunded must be making Shop Direct a fortune.

 

I will write to them giving them the opportunity to refund the charge to me, since I have paid it to avoid any adverse credit status. Although I don't hold much hope that they will reply or refund the charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the answer. Without having the same problem myself, I started a thread asking about this. But apart from everyone knowing what the OFT guidance is, nobody knew what would happen if you were to complain about this.

 

Over on the uk business forum, if you search, you'll find that many business people don't know what the true situation is. And some know that they have non-compliant T&Cs, but don't care.

 

All I can say is; can you please keep us updated concerning how your complaint goes?

 

One thing though, a complaint by telephone is one thing. But what happens if you send a written complaint to Littlewoods head office?

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless the goods are wrong item or faulty they dont have to pay for the return of something , if you dont like or changed your mind, some companys made offer free collection regardless, however its not a part of the DSR , covering unwanted goods

NEVER FORGET

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Help Our Hero's Website

 

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

 

HIGHWAY OF HEROES

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/181826-last-tribute-our-lads.html

 

Like Cooking ? check the Halogen Cooker thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/218990-cooking-halogen-cookers.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless the goods are wrong item or faulty they dont have to pay for the return of something , if you dont like or changed your mind, some companys made offer free collection regardless, however its not a part of the DSR , covering unwanted goods

 

There appears to be a misunderstanding here. I think the OP is saying that littlewoods is not refunding the orginal p&p when the goods were sent from littlewoods to the OP.

 

Under the Distance Selling Regulations, you have a seven day cooling off period. If you decide that you don't want the goods, then you can return them. The company that sold you the goods must refund all costs relating to the initial purchase including postage and packing costs. However, providing that the internet retailer puts this in their T&Cs, the customer has to pay for return postage. If this isn't put in the T&Cs, then the retailer is responsible for collecting the goods, return postage where necessary.

 

There are an awful lot of misunderstanding concerning the DSRs out there. The vast majority of consumers don't understand the law. This means that many retailers don't live up to their obligations under the law, either knowingly or unknowingly, and get away with it.

 

That's why I'm so interested in the case in question. I want to know what's going to happen when someone calls the retailers on it.

 

kiptower: I recommend that you read the document linked to from this page: The Office of Fair Trading: Distance Selling Regulations

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless the goods are wrong item or faulty they dont have to pay for the return of something , if you dont like or changed your mind, some companys made offer free collection regardless, however its not a part of the DSR , covering unwanted goods

 

Yup it's about the postage of £3.95 that they levy on every order that they send to you. It is NOT about the return postage, as littlewoods like next et al operate a collection service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets clear this up,

 

under the DSR a company does not have to refund the original postage nor the return postage if you dont want/like the product

 

however if the goods are faulty / not as ordered / not as described then they are libel for all postage,

 

some Companies may offer free delivery or to collect for free, but they dont have to because you dont like something

 

if you read many websites and tv ad's ( which is correct under the DSR ) they will state you have 7 / 14 / 28 days etc to return the item if you dont like it, and the original purchase price will refunded in full, some people confuse this in thinking it includes the postage cost , unless stated it does not

Edited by kiptower

NEVER FORGET

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Help Our Hero's Website

 

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

 

HIGHWAY OF HEROES

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/181826-last-tribute-our-lads.html

 

Like Cooking ? check the Halogen Cooker thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/218990-cooking-halogen-cookers.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

A letter is off to Head Office - we will see the outcome, however as you have noted that a lot of people don't know about the rules (even when I was looking at something on Richer Sounds website the other day - they had nothing about Distance Selling Regs. Just shows you that they are either oblivious to the regulations, or just plainly ignore them from choice.

 

However, I am still waiting for acknowledgement from the OFT (who are one part of the enforcement proceedings) to acknowledge the complaint. Trading standards merely took details an will take appropriate action (which is probably nothing).

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets clear this up,

 

under the DSR a company does not have to refund the original postage nor the return postage if you dont want/like the product

 

however if the goods are faulty / not as ordered / not as described then they are libel for all postage,

 

some Companies may offer free delivery to collect for free, but they dont have to because you dont like something

 

if you read many websites and tv ad's ( which is correct under the DSR ) they will state you have 7 / 14 / 28 days etc to return the item if you dont like it, and the original purchase price will refunded in full, some people confuse this in thinking it includes the postage cost , unless stated it does not

 

Wrong, original postage and all associated charges have to be refunded. I suggest you read the guidance from the http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/general/oft698.pdf Page 25 S.3.48

Link to post
Share on other sites

wont argue with you ,

 

however , read the DSR again

NEVER FORGET

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Help Our Hero's Website

 

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

 

HIGHWAY OF HEROES

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/181826-last-tribute-our-lads.html

 

Like Cooking ? check the Halogen Cooker thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/218990-cooking-halogen-cookers.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets clear this up,

 

under the DSR a company does not have to refund the original postage nor the return postage if you dont want/like the product

 

Wrong. Please go read the OFT guidance on the distance selling regulations as linked above. It is very clear that the original postage has to be refunded.

 

Edit: Since you seem to be still disputing this, I quote the relevant section.

 

What specifically do I have to refund to the consumer if

they cancel?

3.48 The DSRs require you to refund any money paid by or on behalf of

the consumer in relation to the contract to the person who made the

payment. This means the full price of the goods, or deposit or prepayment

made, including the cost of delivery. The essence of

distance selling is that consumers buy from home and receive goods

at home. In these circumstances, almost every case of home

shopping will involve delivery of the goods ordered and so delivery

forms an essential part of the contract.

Edited by Annoying Twit
Link to post
Share on other sites

And just to add, from the Regs themselves:

 

(1) On the cancellation of a contract under regulation 10, the supplier shall reimburse any sum paid by or on behalf of the consumer under or in relation to the contract to the person by whom it was made free of any charge, less any charge made in accordance with paragraph (5).

 

Para 5 explains the provisions for cost of return.

 

Please now cease any debate as to whether the cost of initial postage is covered or not. It is covered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to the OP. This seems to be a common problem with many mail order catalogues. A friend of mine worked for one and they refused to reimburse postage on the basis that it is a service.

 

When the DSRs came into effect, a few businesses tried it on by making the contract to be one of service (delivering goods), thereby wrangling out of the cancellation provisions. The OFT soon made it clear that it was not acceptable to do this.

 

And there is no contracting out of the provisions. Any term taht purports to do so is ineffective.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...