Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

The Old Direct Debit Guarantee


a_q
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The direct debit guarantee seems to have changed wording over the years, and not in favour of the consumer either. I found the old wording for 2003 here: direct debit guarantee

 

"This Guarantee is offered by all banks and building societies that take part

in the Direct Debit Scheme. The efficiency and security of the Scheme is

monitored and protected by your own bank or building society

If the amount to be paid or the payment dates change the

organisation will notify you normally 10 working days in advance of your

account being debited or as otherwise agreed

If an error is made by the organisation or your bank or building

society, you are guaranteed a full and immediate refund from your branch of

the amount paid

You can cancel a Direct Debit at any time by writing to your bank

or building society. Please also send a copy of your letter to the

organisation."

 

 

does anyone have any earlier forms of this wording and the respective date?

 

I'd be interested to find out when the wording changed and on which date(s).

 

This might be useful to those claiming in court, as the old wording would be relevant for 6-year-old claims and is more favourable.

Edited by a_q
clean up formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Direct Debit Guarantee scheme is irrelevant to bank charges since they are not part of the DD Guarantee Scheme. It is only where a DD is paid where it is relevant. And as it stands today you can go further than 6 years on bank charges claims anyway.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I mentioned bank charges, just "claiming", e.g. for DD's paid when they shouldn't have been, and the bank refusing to refund. So my questions still stand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I mentioned bank charges, just "claiming", e.g. for DD's paid when they shouldn't have been, and the bank refusing to refund. So my questions still stand.

 

They should refund under the DD guarantee scheme even up to 6 years after the debit otherwise you can get the FOS involved.

 

EDIT: can you post up a few more details though?

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

the rules for this are really simple, no matter where the error occurs, your bank MUST refund your account with the disputed amount within 24 of being notified by you. No Ifs, Buts or arguments.

 

The reason they may be awkward about this is because the internal process can be a pain in the *rse for the bank staff. They have to raise something called a Direct debit Indemnity claim which they use to claim the refund that they have already given to you, from the recipient company.

 

The bank really doesn't have any reason not to do this as they will be repaid, but the receiving company may claim against you if they believe the payment was due, then you have the issue of proving that it wasn't.

 

The banks act as facilitator for the payment by noting that an instruction has been received from the company completed and signed by you. So from the bank's point of view, they are following your instructions and will do so until you tell them not to. If they continue after you've told them not to, it is a bank error. If they haven't received notification from you, it's an indemnity claim. Either way, the bank has to refund you within 24 hours.

 

 

This is an extract from the BACS website:-

 

If a Direct Debit payment has been taken which is not in accordance with the advance notice received i.e. too much has been taken or the payment has been taken on the wrong date you are entitled to an immediate refund of the amount debited from your bank under the Direct Debit Guarantee. If the payment due date falls at a weekend or on a bank holiday the organisation is obliged to debit your account just after the due date, not before, unless they notify you in advance of a change of date.

 

To request a refund under the Direct Debit Guarantee, contact your bank in person at the branch, by phone or write to themShould the matter still not be resolved:

 

Contact Bacs via the Helpline number: 0870 049 2717 (please note that this is a national rate number and calls will be charged at standard operator tariffs, the Helpline is available 9.30am to 5pm, Monday to Friday, excluding Bank Holidays). Before calling, please ensure that you have all the relevant details at hand, including your bank account details and full dates and details of all communications with the bank and company with whom the Direct Debit was raised. We will then investigate on your behalf, via internal banking channels, responding to you within 48 hours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rickyd, that is only when the amount is PAID.

 

If it isn't then it does not fall within the DD Guarantee scheme.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

As usual you're spot on.

 

I thought we were discussing payments that had been made when they shouldn't have been. That's what my response was about.

 

If I've misunderstood this please feel free to ignore me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...