Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Amex - Applications - Defaults and Statutory Demands


onandonandon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First post from me so sorry if I have missed anything, though firstly what a fantastic site - just knowing that there are others in the same boat and hearing what they have to say has been the biggest help- so thank you to all the posters on amex.

 

I was wondering if those in the know could shed some light on my situation and the documents from amex....

 

Long story short, I was unable to send money to amex on both a credit card and charge card which had flex select attached to it - which basically shunted off any spend over £200 on to credit., this went through all the calls from them and rma, of which none ended in a conversation, but which did end up with a statutory demand, which is what got me going.

 

I have since applied to have this set aside, based on advice her on the dispute of the debt, its calculation and the default validity.

 

Following that I CCA'd them and received only 1 page application forms for each, both with latterly attached Ts and Cs which had nothing to do with the application forms and which made no reference to them. The CCA requests were addressed to both their solicitors and also to Amex, though the reply with the below actually came from NCO

 

Attached here

Charge Card

goldcreditcardapplicationsigned.jpg

Credit Card

goldchargecardapplicationsigned.jpg

And nothing for the Flex Select

 

On these I have only received the one default here Which relates to the Flex Select alone

flexselectdefault.jpg

 

A month later I received what I think was a cancellation for both the charge and credit accounts here

cancellation.jpg

 

(Though interestingly enough a day later I received a default sums notice adding on £200 ish on the credit card)

 

And a few days after the cancellation letter this was confirmed by RMA in two separate letters asking for payment on each as the accounts had been cancelled

 

So I guess my questions are....

  1. Are the applications enforceable?
  2. Is the lack of paperwork on the Flex Select significant?
  3. Does the flex select - all purchases on the charge card over £200 being put on credit - move the charge card to a credit card?
  4. Are Amex covered by the CCA?
  5. Is the default valid
  6. Does the cancellation cover the charge and credit cards?
  7. If the letters from RMA are to be believed and both are cancelled where do I stand in terms of what Amex suggest I owe them?

 

Any thoughts on this, ideas, suggestions gratefully received

Thanks in advance

gold charge card application signed.jpg

gold credit card application signed.jpg

Edited by onandonandon
Link to post
Share on other sites

You have left your name on the DN (Dear Mr ...).

 

13th March was a Friday, so if posted by 1st class mail, it is not deemed served until Tuesday 17th March (if 2nd class mail Thursday 19th). You then have 14 clear days from 18th March giving you until 1st April to repair the breach. They gave you until 27th March (only 10 days), so the DN is invalid.

 

As they cancelled/terminated the agreement on back of an invalid DN, all you are liable for is the amount stated on the DN (£59). If you have any charges on this account, then that can also make the DN invalid, because the arrears stated would be wrong.

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although it is hard to read the small print, all they have sent you is a copy of your application, not your agreement. However the charge card part would not normally come under the CCA1974, only the Flex part would, but your application says Gold Credit Card Application, so that is a bit confusing.

 

It also looks as if it says "This is a credit card agreement regulated by CCA 1974", although you have blanked part of it out. Can you confirm if that is right?

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

First post from me so sorry if I have missed anything, though firstly what a fantastic site - just knowing that there are others in the same boat and hearing what they have to say has been the biggest help- so thank you to all the posters on amex.

 

I was wondering if those in the know could shed some light on my situation and the documents from amex....

 

Long story short, I was unable to send money to amex on both a credit card and charge card which had flex select attached to it - which basically shunted off any spend over £200 on to credit., this went through all the calls from them and rma, of which none ended in a conversation, but which did end up with a statutory demand, which is what got me going.

 

I have since applied to have this set aside, based on advice her on the dispute of the debt, its calculation and the default validity.

 

Following that I CCA'd them and received only 1 page application forms for each, both with latterly attached Ts and Cs which had nothing to do with the application forms and which made no reference to them. The CCA requests were addressed to both their solicitors and also to Amex, though the reply with the below actually came from NCO

 

Attached here

Charge Card

goldcreditcardapplicationsigned.jpg

Credit Card

goldchargecardapplicationsigned.jpg

And nothing for the Flex Select

 

On these I have only received the one default here Which relates to the Flex Select alone

goldchargecardapplicationsigned.jpg

 

A month later I received what I think was a cancellation for both the charge and credit accounts here

cancellation.jpg

 

(Though interestingly enough a day later I received a default sums notice adding on £200 ish on the credit card)

 

And a few days after the cancellation letter this was confirmed by RMA in two separate letters asking for payment on each as the accounts had been cancelled

 

 

So I guess my questions are....

  1. Are the applications enforceable?
  2. Is the lack of paperwork on the Flex Select significant?
  3. Does the flex select - all purchases on the charge card over £200 being put on credit - move the charge card to a credit card?
  4. Are Amex covered by the CCA?
  5. Is the default valid
  6. Does the cancellation cover the charge and credit cards?
  7. If the letters from RMA are to be believed and both are cancelled where do I stand in terms of what Amex suggest I owe them?

Any thoughts on this, ideas, suggestions gratefully received

Thanks in advance

 

Dear onandonandon

 

The chargecard is not covered by the CCA as far as I know. Under no circumstances return the card(s) cut up or otherwise. A CAG member lost a case recently where the pursuer produced the cut-up card in court and got judgement in their favour.

 

The credit card documentation is an application and does not costitute an valid and properly executed Agreement under the CCA 1974 and is therefore unenforcable. As pointed out by alangee, the DN is also defective which means that since they have terminated the account they are constrained from enforcement. You therefore have two shots at a good defence BUT this will be down to the Judge.

 

Amex will certainly pass this around their usual DCA's; NCO/RMA, VilCol and 1 or 2 others before you end up at Brachers solicitors. Best for you to read all the Amex threads and cases on CAG and become familiar with their processes.

 

IMO it is not really worth responding to Amex DCA's since they appear to simply be instructed to collect, however if the debt is sold on then it is best to respond.

 

Amex will take this to litigation as you will note when you read the other Amex CAG threads. Some go all the way to judgement and some settled before. I have been dealing with them for 4 years and close to the end of my legal case. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Monty,

 

Thanks for that, I was reading about your "adventures" with amex and friends earlier this morning.

 

Could you give me your thoughts on the flex select part of the charge card where purchases of £200+ got pushed on to credit, also I would appreciate you take on the cancellation - it references the charge card account number at the top and copy of the letter says "account and credit card" which to me says both my charge and credit cards - but you never can tell.....

 

Thanks again for the advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alangee

 

Thanks for spotting the name.. removed now.

 

On the notes I mixed up Charge Card and Credit Card application, but they are both there - I had read that the flex part pushed the Charge Card in to the realms of the CCA because of the £200 thing.

 

On the Credit Card application it does say

"Credit Agreement Regulated by the CCA 1074"

It says that

I confirm that the info given is accurate

By signing I agree to the Ts and Cs

I request Amex to issue me with a card and replacement cards

I authorise additional cards as requested

I understand that the Ts and Cs form part of this agreement and that amex may decline to give me a card at its discretion.

 

However the document as far as I remember was a one pager - if you look at the bottom it suggest that the Credit Card Application is page 1/1

 

NCO did some Ts and Cs which they would have me believe were part of the application which are below and which don't look like they have anything to do with the application at all... (oh and they are unsigned by anyone!)

 

pg1sentwithgcapplicationtoccareq.jpg

pg2sentwithgcapplicationtoccareq.jpg

pg3sentwithgcapplicationtoccareq.jpg

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Monty,

 

Thanks for that, I was reading about your "adventures" with amex and friends earlier this morning.

 

Could you give me your thoughts on the flex select part of the charge card where purchases of £200+ got pushed on to credit, also I would appreciate you take on the cancellation - it references the charge card account number at the top and copy of the letter says "account and credit card" which to me says both my charge and credit cards - but you never can tell.....

 

Thanks again for the advice

 

Hi, I cannot comment on the charge card. I had one myself but was a good boy and paid that one off;) I have not seen many Amex charge card issues on CAG. The site team may be able to help?

 

You will just have to sit back and wait for the action with respect to the credit card, you look to be in a good position though. I would not do anything until they issue a writ/summons. Messing about with Amex DCA's is a wast of good stamps, paper and very expensive printer ink.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have/had a Platinum charge card with a flex account. In theory they are two separate accounts, but Amex would take the amount to be paid from the flex account each month and add it to the charge account to be paid. I think that this is in breach of CCA1974, see one of my threads http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/amex/203117-amex-platinum-charge-card.html

 

They have sold that and a Blue CC I had to a DCA, which I am told is very unusual for Amex.

 

I also had a Gold Credit Card, which they admit they cannot even find an application for never mind an agreement, and that has gone quiet.

 

If I was you I would request a SAR to get all the information about your accounts, and ask them specifically if any of the accounts were ever securitised. See thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/202474-well-amex-declines-answer.html for more info on that.

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alan,

 

I agree, the DN they sent on the flex account carried the charge card acc number at the top, and like you they saw it very much as the same thing. (I think your thread is where I got the belief that the charge card should be covered by the CCA)

 

I've scanned over the securitisation thread, but not much has sunk in of it - what is the net effect of it, I mean is it good for them or me?

 

Cheers O

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still looking into the effects of securitisation myself, but if Amex securitised your card they probably done it through their parent company in USA. That would probably mean that your account would have been sold outright to a Special Purpose Vehicle, so that Amex would not own it, only service it. Thus they could not enforce the debt.

 

Remember that prior to November 2008, the only way they could finance their loans was through securitisation.

 

BRW (Banker Rhymes With) is the man you want to speak to on this subject.

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Alan,

 

I spent some "quality" time with that thread - it certainly seems if that was the case then amex would be in the doo doo. But then given the way that things are surely every bank and card would have securitised stuff.. hell I think even the milkman may have done it too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...