Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Independent Sage met yesterday and has a new report out.   They think the national test and trace system doesn't work and are urging the government not to renew Serco's contract. They say the job should be done by GPs and local public health people who are already deal with the more complex cases and care homes.   https://www.independentsage.org/an-independent-sage-discussion-document-on-contact-tracing-and-self-isolation/
    • Thanks for your reply.   I don't have the money to get the repairs or inspections done to be honest.    It's a BMW 1 series.   I've learnt my lesson. I was having a pretty hard time with my health to be honest at the time. I bought it as a present to myself but was too trusting. 
    • This is a tricky one, BMW's , wide wheels, low profile tyres, stiff suspension over deviations, German Cars are known for that.  It might have winter tyres on, that would cause a rumble. My Volvo is also very weird like that.  It could also be a wheel bearing, which isn't expensive but would need to be done. Why not take it to your mechanic for a an inspection, or the AA/ RAC also do that.  I've learnt the hard way that's what you need to do before you buy the car,    What BMW is it?  I would only buy this brand of car at that age if it had a full history of every service and everything that has been spent on it during it's lifetime.
    • If you get somebody to cover for you on those last three days, are you saying you are OK?  ie you don't need to go to work in your old job and you can start the new one?  So that gives you what you want - yes?   If you can't get somebody to cover for you, you've got two potential courses of action - which may or may not be mutually exclusive.  First, ask if you can move your termination date forward by three days.  Obviously you won't get paid for those three days and whether your current trust will agree to this depends on what sort of relationship you have with your manager and how much they will need you to work those three days - or how easy you will be to replace.  If they say OK - you win.   Second, you don't turn up for work on those three days.  You will then technically be in breach of contract and in theory the trust could sue you for any financial loss they suffer as a result.  This would be the cost of employing somebody to replace you for those three days.  Will they need to replace you?  I suspect they would not bother to sue you, but nobody can guarantee they won't.  And what if you want a reference from them in future?  If you've already asked to bring your leave date forward, and they've refused, they may rightly conclude that you are taking the pi$$ if you don't turn up on those days, and they won't like it - or rather they won't like you...   Or, as I said before, get your new start date put back three days.   The thing is, your current employer can't extend your notice period unless you agree.  If they won't allow you to take leave owing to you during that notice period, they should pay you for it.  Whether you should write to them as I suggested earlier is more complicated because the situation is much less clear cut than you originally outlined.  (You had implied that they had already refused your request to take leave owing to you during your notice period and that you would have to extend your notice period to allow you to take that leave.  That isn't quite the position, is it?  And they haven't actually said they won't pay you for any leave you don't take, have they?)   Two other things: first, are you changing employer within the NHS?  If you are, it's a possibility that questions may be asked if you are in the pension scheme and you have two periods of full-time employment that overlap.   Second, your manager's email refers to "your last working day".  This is a little ambiguous and can cause a lot of confusion in the NHS.  You may wish to check whether they mean it is the last day of your employment (ie including any leave you are taking) or is it the last day you are actually present working.  Do you see the difference?  Managers often get hopelessly confused by this without HR guidance.  (And HR often get it wrong).   It's a pity you can't or won't seek union guidance if you are a member - that's what you pay for.
    • And with 33% equity nobody will care either.
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4032 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

My partner recently moved out of a 70s terraced house which had been butchered to provide accommodation for a very large number of people. I had been looking up some of the laws regarding HMO and know the LL broke a number of rules, some downright being dangerous. This LL is an a'hole and withheld my partner's deposit, claiming that it was for bills, which we never saw (long story). Since it was only £100, I am going to let him have it, BUT, his house is not a proper HMO, I wanted to report him to the appropriate authorities. Problem is I do not know who to report each of the violations to. So here is a list of the violations:

 

  1. Unlicensed HMO - no licence had been applied for the house to be used as a HMO.


  2. Insufficient fire protection - There are no mains powered interlinked fire alarms in the house, no fire doors and insufficient fire proofing in the walls. Nor is there a fire plan.


  3. Overcrowding - It was a 2 bedroom house which had been converted into a 4 bedroom. So there are 4 different tenants, in addition to the LL, his wife and two children. A total of 8 persons. However there is only 1 WC and 1 combined shower room.
  4. Room size too small - In reference to point 3 above, the room sizes are 6m2 or below.
  5. Illegal conservatory - The conservatory he had put up does not comply with Permitted Development under the Planning Regulations. No planning application had ever been made for the conservatory.
  6. Unsafe equipments - The electrical appliances had been installed by the LL himself, with no testing or certification done by a professional on a annual basis. The gas cooker had no CORGI certificate.
  7. Council tax fraud - It was reported to the local as only occupied by students. However LL and his wife, who live in the same house, works.

I hope someone can kindly point me in the right direction to report this LL for each of these violations.

 

Thank you very much!


NatWest for £272:Full and final settlement: 13/11/06

Argos Card for £52.50:Paid to Argos account: 10/11/06

Bank of Scotland for £218:Full and final settlement: 25/01/07

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

"Unlicensed HMO - no licence had been applied for the house to be used as a HMO."

 

Environmental Health at the Council - does not necessarily need one but they'll tell you.

 

Insufficient fire protection - There are no mains powered interlinked fire alarms in the house, no fire doors and insufficient fire proofing in the walls. Nor is there a fire plan
.

 

The fire safety officer in Building Control at the Council.

 

Overcrowding - It was a 2 bedroom house which had been converted into a 4 bedroom. So there are 4 different tenants, in addition to the LL, his wife and two children. A total of 8 persons. However there is only 1 WC and 1 combined shower room.

 

Planning enforcement in the planning department at the Council - you need planning permission for more than 6 unrelated people to live together if they are sharing kitchen and bathroom.

 

Room size too small - In reference to point 3 above, the room sizes are 6m2 or below.

 

Not necessarily a direct breach of any legislation but would be borne in mind by the planners when deciding whether the unauthorised change of use should be allowed to continue.

 

Illegal conservatory - The conservatory he had put up does not comply with Permitted Development under the Planning Regulations. No planning application had ever been made for the conservatory.

 

What make you think this? Was it built before or after October 2008? How was the house occupied when it was built? This is for the planning enforcement officers too though.

 

Unsafe equipments - The electrical appliances had been installed by the LL himself, with no testing or certification done by a professional on a annual basis. The gas cooker had no CORGI certificate.

 

Hmm not as certain about this one. Gas and CORGI is Building Control. Try the Health and Safety team within Environmental Health?

 

Council tax fraud - It was reported to the local as only occupied by students. However LL and his wife, who live in the same house, works.

 

Strangley enough Council Tax (sometimes called "Valuations") at the Council. Get on their website - you should be able to get contact details, or fill in online enquiry forms there.

 

Px

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

18th April 2008

A Bradford company has been fined for failing to licence two of its properties under houses in multiple occupation regulations.

Meridian Property Management and the company’s directors Salim Khan and Zahoor Ahmed were confronted by Jennie Stopford and Nazima Kauser, EHOs for Bradford City Council, after an inspection of the properties in November 2006 found they were unlicensed.

Meridian Property Management was founded by Mr Khan in 1995 and manages a range of flats and multi-roomed detached houses.

Charged with offences under section 72 of the Housing Act 2004, Mr Khan and Mr Ahmed initially pleaded not guilty at two hearings before admitting culpability in November 2007.

The company was fined £1,600 and the two director were fined £1,200. They were also ordered to pay council costs of £1,174.

The council’s private sector housing team said it would pursue all landlords and managing agents who operated an HMO without a licence.


http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by patrickq1 are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pink1,

 

"Environmental Health at the Council - does not necessarily need one but they'll tell you."

 

The LL do need a HMO licence for the house. If a landlord lives in his property with only 2 other occupants, the property will not be classified as an HMO. However, if the landlord has 3 or more other occupants living in their property, that property becomes an HMO. For these purposes the resident landlord and his family will count as one person.

 

"What make you think this? Was it built before or after October 2008? How was the house occupied when it was built? This is for the planning enforcement officers too though."

 

The conservatory is illegal as it fail on 2 aspect, it is too long (>3000mm) and is not separated from the house by an external quality door, patio door or French doors as per Building Regulations. In fact, there is no door at all. Also, it was built before October 2008, before the current Building Regulation come into force. I did a search on the local council's planning website and there was no applications for the conservatory, ever.


NatWest for £272:Full and final settlement: 13/11/06

Argos Card for £52.50:Paid to Argos account: 10/11/06

Bank of Scotland for £218:Full and final settlement: 25/01/07

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is something about (in Env. Health terms) the number of habitable storeys a building has to have (I'm thinking 3 for some reason) before it needs to be licensed as an HMO. This is different from the planning definition of an HMO relating to number of occupants. As I say, if you can't find an EHO on here, I really would advise you to ask your council and they'll advise you - please post the answer if you do, I'd love to know!

 

Before October 2008 the 3m projection limit to the rear of a semi or terraced house did not exist. That came into effect with the new GPDO on 1st October 2008. The "old rules" stated that you could add up to 70 cubic metres to a house, as long as you were coming no closer to a highway bounding the curtilage, didn't cover more than half the garden etc etc. You need to try not to mix building regs issues (although you're right about the doors) with planning ones... It would be quite unusual for a conservatory on a single dwelling house to need planning permission but this is why I ask how the house was occupied when it was built - an HMO (according to the planning definition) has no pd rights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...