Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wholesaler & Consumer Law


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Just looking for some help here...I've just tried to demand a refund at a wholesaler...to cut a long story short I started talking about SOGA etc, however, was shot down and told that "as we are a business to business wholesaler and you have signed in your agreement upon opening an account with us that you are only buying goods on behalf of the business, and not for personal use, that consumer law does not apply..."

 

What they have said is right - they don't deal with people wanting to buy stuff for themselves, only companies buying on behalf of the business. It is in the T&C of the makro card I signed for...

 

Is this right though?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are correct in that there are less rights in business to business contracts of sale. But are you a business? It will depend on various factors.

 

Even so, their own T&Cs on the website state that they have a 28 day no quibble return and also have a 12 month returns policy (the legality of some of those terms are a bit questionable).

 

I think you cut the story short when the longer (factual) version is needed in order to be able to offer advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are correct in that there are less rights in business to business contracts of sale. But are you a business? It will depend on various factors.

 

Even so, their own T&Cs on the website state that they have a 28 day no quibble return and also have a 12 month returns policy (the legality of some of those terms are a bit questionable).

 

I think you cut the story short when the longer (factual) version is needed in order to be able to offer advice.

 

Thanks for your advice so far.

 

I bought a Dyson vacuum around 8 months ago, it's totally broken now...won't turn on. I took it back for a replacement/refund, to be told they don't take them back. I was told to contact Dyson direct and they would arrange to repair it. I said I wasn't happy with that, my contract is with them, not Dyson. That is when they started saying consumer law doesn't apply. They said that "to make it easier for customers, with certain products, we will direct you to a helpline who will either repair, or if it is uneconomical to do so, will provide you with a reference number to bring to Makro and we will replace/refund".

 

I think what they were trying to say that as they are a business to business wholesaler, that as far as law permits, their Terms & Conditions state what the policy is in the absence of consumer laws (i.e. SOGA).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that being a Makro member they class all members as retailers ( when a lot are not ) . In their eyes you have bought the product to be resold to the public so it seems it is your responsibility to contact Dyson.

 

I have returned faulty goods after a week or so and have never had a problem. Perhaps it's down to the Manager how returns are handled.

 

Get a Hoover next time !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

SOGA does not apply exclusively to contracts for the sale of goods to consumers - it just gives consumers more rights. All contracts for the sale of goods are covered by section 14 (2):

 

Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice so far.

 

I bought a Dyson vacuum around 8 months ago, it's totally broken now...won't turn on. I took it back for a replacement/refund, to be told they don't take them back. I was told to contact Dyson direct and they would arrange to repair it. I said I wasn't happy with that, my contract is with them, not Dyson. That is when they started saying consumer law doesn't apply. They said that "to make it easier for customers, with certain products, we will direct you to a helpline who will either repair, or if it is uneconomical to do so, will provide you with a reference number to bring to Makro and we will replace/refund".

 

I think what they were trying to say that as they are a business to business wholesaler, that as far as law permits, their Terms & Conditions state what the policy is in the absence of consumer laws (i.e. SOGA).

 

 

So I take it what they are saying is correct...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a matter of consumer law, it's one of contract. You have a contract with Makro, not with the manufacturer.

 

I think a letter to their head office is in order, as well as reporting this to Consumer Direct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...