Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, hope someone can help - i have had a nightmare.

 

I will be very brief:

 

I own a tv/hifi /pc shop. Bailiff turned up on behalf of a HCEO 1 month ago. i wasnt there, so my staff took an envelope off him and they got me to speak to him on the phone. they were looking for some £1400, but they just had an address on the writ, no name. i told them that it was probably down to one of my tenants, (now left) as i rent parts of my shop out. They said they would get back to me when they found out more, i told them i would help if i could.

 

when i got back i saw the writ and a walking posesion agreement (unsigned) for goods in the shop to the value of the debt.

 

I rang my lawyers and told them what had happened. They said that because there was no name of anyone on the writ it was unenforcable, but to check with the issuing court to find out more. The court would not speak to me about it cos i wasnt the person on the writ!

 

 

this week, they came back and told me it was my debt as i owned the shop. i told them it was a load of rubbish and told them to get out.

it was very awkward cos the shop was full of customers etc. I told them there was no way i was paying anything, and they said they would order a lorry to come over and take goods, and it woukld cost me even more £££ I told them if they touched anything that i would call the police.

 

After about 1.5 hrs of me telling them they had the 'wrong guy' they called the police saying that there could be breach of the peace.

 

4 cars turned up and twice as many officers. in the very end i paid the bill on advice of the police, and under all the pressure.

 

the bill was:

fees bought forward from the first visit £1890

poterage fee £125.00

other £370.00

+ vat £76.75?

= £2461.75

 

i see that the original 'judgment debt' was for £700.00

 

not sure how the hell they get to this figure, but iam sure all this is illegal. i paid on my debit card, but need the money back asap.

 

Can anyone help pls as iam not sure what route to take.

 

Thanks in anticipation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would make a complaint to the police as they are NOT debt collectors and as you were being reasonable the only potential source of a breach of the peace was from the bailiffs.

 

Too often the police react in this way having no knowledge of this area of the law.

 

You should also look at getting the judgement set aside if you have no knowledge of it.

 

GK

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is exactly what happened to me. l have now also found out that the bailiff in question is not a certificated Marston nor selfemployed bailiff. As for the police, it seems that they tend to assist the bailiff rather than advice him of his obligations or to ensure themselves that he has all the required documentation. Something got to be done and although l am in the process of filing all and everything l can, l think a more concerted effort by all of us who have suffered something similar is needed.

Gustavius

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not geet hold of Tomtuby, they are the bailiff expert on this site and should be able to offer more advice. If the bailiff wasn't certified or employed by a company then it is theft, and you need to report the matter to the police 'obtaining monies by deception' comes under the Fraud Act...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not geet hold of Tomtuby, they are the bailiff expert on this site and should be able to offer more advice. If the bailiff wasn't certified or employed by a company then it is theft, and you need to report the matter to the police 'obtaining monies by deception' comes under the Fraud Act...

 

 

l have another thread here and TT's really given me some good advice which will be used as l proceed. However, TT can only do so much and the rest is up to the rest of us. The problem remains the same, though, so many threads with similar problems, but, no common approach. Until we are many we will be weak and individually not have any major impact. We need to make the authorities aware of what's going on and that a major change is needed urgently.

GR

Link to post
Share on other sites

l have another thread here and TT's really given me some good advice which will be used as l proceed. However, TT can only do so much and the rest is up to the rest of us. The problem remains the same, though, so many threads with similar problems, but, no common approach. Until we are many we will be weak and individually not have any major impact. We need to make the authorities aware of what's going on and that a major change is needed urgently.

GR

 

 

I totally agree with you there........To many people are being taken for a ride I was one of them But tt got me a refund which was due still wating for form 4 to be done....

 

For people hat have laws to abide by I just don't understand how they are all getting away with it.

I think there needs to be a leaflet drop lol in every single household in the uk regarding bailiff issues and what they can't and can do with regards bullieing and so forth to many peole suffer and they shouldn't have to.

 

 

And TT does a fantastic job But she only has one pair of hands as we all do

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've checked out the fees hceo's should charge and there should be fees of about £150 on a judgement of £700?

 

Have made many, many enquiries etc. and it looks like i could be getting the money back.

 

It would be nice to issue a fatwa on this hceo. Is there a form for that?!!

 

Chrs

Cameraboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its called a Form 4, and you need to get it in asap... he clearly has exceed his authority in collecting from you when you were not the original creditor. Sorry... I mean original debtor.

 

I think you should also get your local MP involved here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you can put one in but it is adviseable to contact the bailff (in writing) first and give them a chance to respond. I am soon going to court with a form 4 and have been told by a few clever peeps that the judge looks more favourably upon those who have attepted to get a reasonable outcome from the bailiffs first. Have a loook on here www.biliffadviceonline.co.uk. There is a section specifically on complaints .

Link to post
Share on other sites

why wont it let me write the website?! Linking to commercial websites is not allowed under the site rules. if you cant see it pm me and il send it to you :) details of commercial website removed

Edited by ScarletPimpernel
Remove commercial website details
Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone i know received a refund and they said that it was in full and final settlement of the matter, implying that if the payment was cashed then one couldnt take any further action.

 

Is this how they get away with so much?, or would that not stand and you could take further action against them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...