Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks very much Bank. I have topped and tailed my LOC and printed off a copy which I shall post tomorrow by First Class post at my local post office and also obtain a proof of postage. I'll also email them a copy. I've opened a MoneyClaim account, and shall now begin work on my draft Particulars of Claim which I shall post here for your thoughts. And I shan't be using the Moderation service.
    • Yes, it struck me this morning that I'd got it wrong    - no involvement of UKPPO in any previous Tesco thread    - there would have been an entrance sign to a Tesco car park    - CCTV isn't something associated with Tesco car parks. Presumably whoever runs the car park has put CCTV at the electric, and probably BB, areas, done absolutely nothing to stop abuse, and then rubs their hands in glee every time the CCTV catches a motorist out. You can pay £60 and this will go away. Or you can defy UKPPO and rely on their non-respect of POFA, consideration period, etc., should they be daft enough to do court later down the line.  We would support you all the way.
    • thats not the way to do it sorry. sorry so what is your problem? that vanquis paid the £560 or that they are now chasing it? how old is this debt? dx  
    • If you visited Qatar you could be detained at the border, if the debt has been notified.  If you are only in transit and do not seek to cross border into Qatar you might be ok, but you may want to seek formal advice about this.
    • Howdy, I had a short lived credit card with Vanquis that I did not need. I paid it off in full and called them and closed it with the person at the other end. 2 months later they started sending me messages about late payments, I called them and to find out that the card had not been closed in error and 6 weeks after it should have been closed they paid a google debit of £560. I hit the roof and made a formal complaint that took them well over a month to respond to. They agreed they were at fault, refunded all late payments fees and offered me £100 in compensation. However they said the debit amount stood as 'I had benefit from it' and I should get a refund from google. I hit the roof again but they have stuck to their guns. The debit from google is a genuine one but I wanted to dispute it with google so closed the card so they would have to engage with me. But surely that's neither here nor there surely? What is the next step? Ombudsman takes forever doesn't it?  thanks in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Link Financial and MBNA Card debt


HP Mum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2996 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wish to take on MBNA :) about my credit card debt and need some helpful advice please...

 

I have all my statements from start point in May 05 and I think I have the Agreement too, but am unsure as the one sheet I have is the one that had the card attached to it and has a line half way down the page with the CCA 74 t&cs below the line.

(I think I originally replied to a freebie through the door and they then just sent me the card.)

 

Put simply, my circumstances changed a few years ago. At the end of last year I just could not afford the high monthly payments anymore. I had tried to keep everyone happy but ended up with huge arrears to the one bank that really mattered - the one with my mortgage :(. I wrote and explained my situation to the credit card/loan companies, had the standard replies most people seem to get, then got passed on to dcas. Then I got inundated with harassing phonecalls - which I either never answered or just calmly explained my situation and wouldnt give in to their harassment til they hung up !!

I composed letters to each dca offering small amounts monthly. They all agreed and I have spent a few months this year breathing again. But having just discovered this site.... now I am wondering if my mbna debt is enforceable anyway. I have read and read and read these last few days and now my head is spinning.....

 

So can someone please tell me how I work out if my Mbna Agreement is enforceable ?

And if there is a chance it is not, then what I have to do ? Do I have to write asking for a true copy of the cca (as per the template on this site) ?

 

Mbna has already passed on my account to Link Financial.

 

I await to hear back from some of you geniuses ;-)

Thanks.

Edited by HP Mum
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Guest Old_andrew2018

You could up load the agreement you have using photobucket, please remove any personal information, you will quickly receive advice.

Were any penalty charges levied on your MBNA account?

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest Old_andrew2018

Try using the upload link on photo bucket for message boards without the thumbnails option as suggested by postggj

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

does this mean I set up an account with photobucket and then people can view my attachments there ?

 

http://i841.photobucket.com/albums/zz340/hpmum/mbnaagreement.jpg

I cant seem to get this right !! How do I get it bigger for everyone to see ?

 

Please - someone .... How do I use photobucket and get it large enough for others to read and then advise me ???

 

http://i841.photobucket.com/albums/zz340/hpmum/mbnaccabackpage.jpg

http://i841.photobucket.com/albums/zz340/hpmum/mbnacca.jpg

 

I have, I think, figured out photobucket and put the link to the album above.

Can someone please advise on if my account with mbna is enforceable ?

And if not, what do I do now ?

thanks

 

Can someone advise if this MBNA Agreement (below on Photobucket link) is enforceable ?

It was taken out in May 2005.

One page document, front and back details.

 

I have had loads of letters from LINK Financial, agreed to pay them a nominal amount against mbna debt, but stopped paying them in July. Am worried now that I will get a Claim form through soon for repayment of the whole debt. Want to pre-empt that by either sending request pursuant to S.78 of CCA 74 or a CPR 31.16 request.

 

Please help.

 

http://i841.photobucket.com/albums/z...um/mbnacca.jpg

 

http://i841.photobucket.com/albums/z...cabackpage.jpg

 

Thanks in advance.

user_online.gifreputation.gif report.gif progress.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Thanks Supa,

The only place to sign is on the reverse page in the bottom right, "Cancellation Form" - only sign this if you wish to cancel this agreement..."

 

If I remember rightly I got a form in the post offering me this card - like the normal junk mail kind of offers that pop through the door. In this instance I think I filled in the application form and waited for their reply. I may even have spoken to them on the phone, but I can't remember. But I did then suddenly get the card with a credit limit of £12,500 ! I was struggling financially at the time so I remember I was pretty surprised that they gave it to me !!

 

So what do I do ?

I have started reading PTs thread on NOT doing the S78 route but with 84 pages it is a bit too long to read all of it !! And now I understand that it is possible to pre-empt a Claim by sending in a CPR 31.16 request.

I am confused.

Do I send in a SAR ? A CPR 31.16 ? Or S.78 ?

 

Does anyone know ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets back track here.

The agreement you've posted up is a copy that you have kept ( and would not be required to sign) but what do MBNA have ?

 

You'll need to send a CCA request to Link as they are now dealing with the account.

 

Have a look at letter 8 - The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors

 

I would advise that you re-read pt2537's thread, as it may be worthwhile pursuing this route to ensure that MBNA don't have a valid CCA

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to the Post Office before I read your post :(.

I have sent the S.78 request for CCA by special to Link today.

I was intrigued too that the post office added a 50% charge for a £1 postal order....

 

I will go back to PT's thread to see if that throws up my next course of action, ie sending in the CPR 31.16 too...

 

I'm not sure what mbna will have.... Fingers crossed, nothing !

Do they have 12+2 days to reply to me from date of posting or receipt ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I just realised ONE month has passed and MBNA have not replied.

 

So what do I do now ??

 

This is what I sent to the dca (Link) handling my MBNA account:

"This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request; the provisions of s.78 (6) will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5 (2), 3(b), 6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee."

 

 

I have heard nothing back from Link or MBNA since sending this on 17 Nov.

Should I now send in a CPR 31.16 letter ??

 

Please can someone advise best route to take now ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HP mum,

 

If I am reading this correctly, the form that you have posted above, is just the card carrier. Do not confuse this with a credit agreement. The agreement will be something that you have signed before the card arrived.

 

If MBNA have sold this to link, they will need to have defaulted you. Can you let us know the date of the default Notice and the date for rectification. Also if the amount mentioned in the DN is just the arrears or the full ballance. Helpful if you kept the envelope also. They or Link then need to issue you with a notice of assignment, advising you that Link now own the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for responding Vint.

 

I was defaulted on 9 Jan 09.

 

The DN asked me to pay arrears only, by a certain date - 26/01/09.

 

Link wrote to me 30 Jan 09 saying they were the current owner of the whole debt.

 

The balance Link has quoted is huge. It includes all sorts of charges that I had disputed with MBNA which had taken me well over my limit.

 

I made Link an offer of tiny monthly payments, which I kept to for a bit and then stopped in August.

 

I sent Link a S.78 request 17/11/09.

Link has not replied.

 

I have all paperwork dating back to start of card but no agreement, only this card carrier doc.

 

So what do you think is the next step for me ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they are in a pickle here. Looks like your luck with Halifax will follow you for a while. Cany you give me some numbers for this weeks lottery:D

 

The DN is completely useless to them, especially if you kept the envelope. They use UK Mail s which is second class, so 4 days for service. If you did not keep the envelope, they would need to prove how it was served.

 

So the DN dated 9th January, which is a friday, would be deemed to be served 4 working days after posting, so 15th January 2009. The date to rectify by should be +14 days, so 29th January 2009. They did not allow you the required time to rectify the default, so by terminating the agreement ( selling to Link ) they have unlawfully rescinded the agreement.

 

I will put something together for you to look at.

 

Also check the screenshots in your SAR for the date that it was sold to Link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HP Mum, Try this letter.

xxxxxx 2009.

Dear xxxxxxxxx,

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

Re account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I write regarding recent communication regarding the above account. I acknowledge no debt to your organisation.

Further to my numerous frustrated requests under s 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, to both MBNA and Link, your attention is drawn to the fact that this account remains subject to a lawful serious dispute. On xxxxxxxx, by recorded delivery, I requested that MBNA supply me a copy of the executed credit agreement covering this account pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 78, a copy of this request is enclosed. On xxxxxxx I made the same legal request to your organisation. Again a copy of this request to you is enclosed. To date both MBNA and Link have failed to comply with my request and the law, supplying no documents whatsoever and ignoring this legal request.

Without production of the said agreement I am unable to assess if I am indeed liable for any alleged debt to you, nor does it give me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’ as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

While this account remains in serious dispute, the relevant main points of the Law and OFT regulations while the account is in this state and MBNA and now Link remain in default are:

  • You may not ask for payment against this account.
  • I am not obliged to offer any payment against this account.
  • You cannot register any data with a third party.
  • You cannot take any enforcement action, including registering Defaults.
  • You cannot pass the account on to a third party for collection.
  • You cannot sell the account.

So you will understand from the above, that Failures by MBNA to supply the required documents under the act, preclude the sale of the agreement to yourselves. The breaches of the relevant laws and regulations by MBNA, are now compounded by your organisations recent communications while the account was legally in dispute with MBNA.

Let me explain here, what a true copy is:

In a recent letter from the enforcement department of the OFT, the text below was quoted, explaining what is required.

“The copy of the executed agreement need not be an exact copy but it must be a ‘true copy’ and not some reconstruction of what the original might have been and it must contain the same terms as the original. Where the terms have been varied as provided for within the agreement, the copy of the original agreement must be accompanied by a document setting out the current terms, as varied. Certain details may be omitted from the original agreement eg the signature but the debtor must be in no doubt as to the true nature of his obligations under the loan.

 

Should no original agreement be in existence it is very hard to say that the copy the creditor offers to the debtor is, in fact, a true copy as there would be no original with which to compare it. In our view the onus of proof would be on the creditor to show that the copy is a true one and where none existed he may have difficulty discharging this. Neither should creditors suggest that a consumer has signed a credit agreement where they are unable to provide evidence to support this — to do so is likely to be a misleading action under Regulation 5 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (the CPRs) and would also constitute an unfair or improper business practice.”

 

I also refer you to the information below.

1. A valid credit agreement must contain certain terms within the signature document (s.60(1)(2) CCA 1974). These core terms are the credit limit, repayment terms and the rate of interest (SI 1983/1553 (6 Signing of agreement) which states that the prescribed terms must be within the signature document. (Column 2 schedule 6). s.61(1)(a) states the agreement must contain all the prescribed terms and be signed by both the debtor and on behalf of the creditor.

 

 

2. Further, s.127(3) CCA 1974 makes the account unenforceable if it is not in the proper form and content or improperly executed.

 

In Wilson and another v Hurstanger Ltd (2007) it was stated “In my judgment the objective of Schedule 6 is to ensure that, as an inflexible condition of enforceability, certain basic minimum terms are included which the parties … and/or the court can identify within the four corners of the agreement. Those minimum provisions combined with the requirement under s.61 that all the terms should be in a single document, and backed up by the provisions of section 127(3), ensure that these core terms are expressly set out in the agreement itself: they cannot be orally agreed; they cannot be found in another document; they cannot be implied; and above all they cannot be in the slightest mis-stated. As a matter of policy, the lender is denied any room for manoeuvre in respect of them. On the other hand, they are basic provisions, and the only question for the court is whether they are, on a true construction, included in the agreement”.

 

2. The need for prescribed terms to be contained in the credit agreement is confirmed by the Author of the CCA1974 act, I quote ““As the draftsman of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 I would like to thank Dr Richard Lawson for his interesting and well-argued article (30 August 2003) on Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2003] UKHL 40, [2003] 4 All ER 97.

 

Dr Lawson may be interested to know that I included the provision in question (section 127(3)) entirely on my own initiative. It seemed right to me that if the creditor company couldn’t be bothered to ensure that all the prescribed particulars were accurately included in the credit agreement it deserved to find it unenforceable, and that the court should not have power to relieve it from this penalty. Nobody queried this, and it went through Parliament without debate. I’m glad the House of Lords has now vindicated my reasoning and confirmed that nobody’s human rights were infringed.” - 167 Justice of the Peace (2003) 773.”

I am now granting to Link, a further 7 days to produce a copy of an executable agreement. After that I will consider that the above matter is closed and that you will no longer pursue the alleged debt. If you are unable to supply a compliant copy of the alleged agreement, I would remind you that you are obliged to inform me of that fact. I would suggest that the best course of action would be to immediately set the balance of the above account number to zero.

In addition to the above, prior to your involvement in this matter, MBNA have unlawfully rescinded the alleged agreement. This unlawful rescission is fully accepted by me. With reference to s 87 of the CCA 1974, your organisation will be aware of the implications of MBNA’s unlawful actions.

I look forward to your response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Johnrog - card dates from May 05.

 

Thanks Vint. I will read through this properly and revert back later. Although I never sent s.78 request to MBNA !! Only Link. Would have to tweek it a bit...

 

I guess I need to request SAR to see when MBNA sold it to Link. Should I do that tomorrow, 22nd ??

A nice job for someone over the Christmas holiday period !!

 

Vint - I never do the lottery but how about: 4, 8, 9, 11, 17, 24. :)

Randomly chosen....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hp Mum,

looks like your DN is invalid was it for the full amount?

Dated 9/9 means it would be delivered either 13th or 15th which does not give the required 14 days shame that. If you have the envelope keep it safe.

 

Remember 2 days for service 1st Class and 4 for 2nd the days start after the date on letter and 10 & 11 were weekend so they don't count.

 

 

You need to send your SAR to MBN@, you will get the comms log then and you can find the exact date it was sold. Plus you can work out charges etc.

 

 

 

Pumpytums

Link to post
Share on other sites

PT - Actually the DN was for the outstanding arrears, not the whole lot.

I will check my records properly though and revert tonight.

I will also draft the SAR tonight and, after final approval, will special tomorrow, Weds.

 

I have tried drafting a letter. But I am stumbling. I have read all my docs and am confused on exactly what to write as the suggested letter above #23 doesn't fit exactly.

 

I had a dispute with Mbna and was arguing the balance and payment schedule from Oct 08. The account was thus in dispute, yet was still sold on to Link in Jan 09.

 

I have re-checked the letter dates:

The DN from MBNA was 9/1/09. They asked for payment of the arrears by 26/01/09

The letter from Link was dated 30 Jan - BUT they quote "MBNA has, as of 22/01/09, assigned to Link the outstanding balance due under the CCA. The full amount is due to us immediately. The total outstanding balance is £xx."

The balance Link is quoting is the disputed amount (much higher due to costs and charges over my limit).

My S.78 Request letter to Link was specialed on 17/11/09. No reply yet.

 

 

I can see that MBNA screwed up by assigning my debt on the 22/01, 4 days before their deadline to pay the arrears. But Link has been assigned my debt. So I am assuming that I just write to Link now and not MBNA ?? Even though MBNA acted illegally in assigning my disputed debt.

And if Link has the assigned debt then I assume I send the SAR to them ? And not to MBNA ?

 

Any extra advice here ?

 

OK.

I have drafted my SAR, as below.

But who do I send it to ? Link or MBNA ?

 

 

Re:− MBNA Acc# xx/ Link Reference xx

 

Data Protection Act 1998

 

Subject Access Request

 

 

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with MBNA.

3. True copies of any notice of assignment and default notices or enforcement notice that you/or name of the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

4. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted.

 

5. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date they were levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charges were calculated, and what the charges cover.

6. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

7. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

8. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

9. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement/s.

10. Termination notices

 

PLEASE NOTE: That unless otherwise stated by yourselves and if the above documents are NOT provided, it will be CONFIRMED that you are unable to reproduce/provide in any way shape or form any copies of the above requested documents. You are reminded that you have a duty to inform me if you do not have the above documents. This is confirmed in High Court Law - Ezsias v Welsh Ministers - [2007] All ER (D) 65 (Dec)

 

You are reminded that you are obliged to supply all the above documents in line with the Information Commissioners Technical Guidance update (Dated Aug07)

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

 

And regarding Vint's letter suggestion, I have tweeked it a bit.

How does this sound ?

 

"ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE.

 

I write regarding recent communication regarding the above account.

I acknowledge no debt to your organization.

 

Further to my requests under s.78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to MBNA & Link, your attention is drawn to the fact that this account remains subject to a lawful serious dispute. In my letter, dated xx, sent by Special Delivery, I requested that Link supplies me a copy of the executed credit agreement covering this account pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 78. A copy of this request is enclosed.

To date, Link has failed to comply with my request - and the law - by supplying no documents whatsoever and ignoring this legal request.

 

Without production of the said agreement I am unable to assess if I am indeed liable for any alleged debt to you, nor does it give me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’ as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

 

While this account remains in serious dispute and Link remains in default, the relevant main points of the Law and OFT regulations are:

 

  • You may not ask for payment against this account.
  • I am not obliged to offer any payment against this account.
  • You cannot register any data with a third party.
  • You cannot take any enforcement action, including registering Defaults.
  • You cannot pass the account on to a third party for collection.
  • You cannot sell the account.

** This is the bit I am having problems writing as I never sent the S.78 request to MBNA, only Link****

You will understand from the above, that failures by MBNA to supply the required documents under the act, preclude the sale of the agreement to yourselves, Link. The breaches of the relevant laws and regulations by MBNA, are now compounded by your organization’s recent communications while the account was legally in dispute with MBNA.

 

 

I am now granting to Link, a further 7 days to produce a copy of an executable agreement. After that I will consider that the above matter is closed and that you will no longer pursue the alleged debt. If you are unable to supply a compliant copy of the alleged agreement, I would remind you that you are obliged to inform me of that fact. I would suggest that the best course of action would be to immediately set the balance of the above account number to zero.

 

In addition to the above, prior to your involvement in this matter, MBNA have unlawfully rescinded the alleged agreement. This unlawful rescission is fully accepted by me. With reference to s 87 of the CCA 1974, your organisation will be aware of the implications of MBNA’s unlawful actions.

 

I look forward to your response.

 

I hope someone can step in here and help me tweek the 2 letters I need to write. Would be good to get them off today....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HP Mum,

have a read of my thread :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/225840-pumpy-tums-mbna.html

 

Looks very similar. Again it looks as Vint coined "cart before the donkey" phrase applys.

 

 

They have unlawfully rescinded your agreement. They have terminated it before the DN expired so basically there no longer is an agreement or possible a balance now.

 

Have you an upto date SAR showing the date of sale? If not I would suggest sending a request for one ASAP. In my opinion you need hard evidence that the account was sold to Link. The SAR comms log will confirm this.

 

 

I'm sure Vint will be along very shortly to advise.

 

SAR needs to go to MBNA.

 

 

Pumpytums

Edited by pumpytums
Link to post
Share on other sites

Postggj - I have just printed my SAR below and am looking to special it to MBNA today.

I am just trying to work out the best response to Link for not replying to my S.78 Request....(specialed 17/11)

 

Subject Access Request

Please supply me with all data - not limited to my transaction history and not limited merely to 6 years of historical information - which you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with MBNA.

3. True copies of any notice of assignment and default notices or enforcement notice that you sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

4. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date they were levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charges were calculated, and what the charges cover.

5. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

6. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

7. A list of third party agencies to which you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

8. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

9. Termination notices

PLEASE NOTE: That unless otherwise stated by yourselves, and if the above documents are NOT provided, it will be confirmed that you are unable to reproduce/provide in any way shape or form any copies of the above requested documents. You are reminded that you have a duty to inform me if you do not have the above documents. This is confirmed in High Court Law - Ezsias v Welsh Ministers - [2007] All ER (D) 65 (Dec).

 

You are reminded that you are obliged to supply all the above documents in line with the Information Commissioners Technical Guidance update (Dated Aug 07)

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

Please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable."

 

I am hoping that mbna go the same way as H !!

Do you have any comments ? Extra advice ?

Edited by HP Mum
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...