Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Need to go for PPI with Barclaycard, Citi and Cap One


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there - I would appreciate some help!

 

Please see below my post from the Debt Forum, also posted here as part of it relates to PPI.

 

I, like others have found myself in the situation that having been made redundant I have now managed to find another job, but have had to take a significant reduction in pay - around 30%. At least I have a job though.

 

The issues which I have are twofold. Most pressing is that despite cutting back on just about everything there is a shortfall of around £400 a month after everything is paid, and this has now used up any savings we had. The only other thing to attack would appear to be credit card debts, built up some time ago, but which we were paying off steadily before I was made redundant, and which we have struggled to do since my new job started. In total we are paying around £450 a month, so I am hoping to approach the card companies we are paying most to and ask to make token payments and hope that they freeze interest and charges (each has been steadily adding late payment charges over the last few months as I have only been able to pay when I get paid so this is often a few days late. What response am I likely to get? Barclaycard have already been an absolute pain over the late payments and arrears, making upwards of 100 phone calls and refusing to stop despite me telling them that I am not in during the day, but their calls are disturbing my wife's sleep as she works shifts and needs to rest (they said that they are not obliged to stop as it is impractical to have letters going back and forth - I have registered a formal complaint for harassment but still they are calling even while this is 'investigated'). Annoying thing is that the arrears were largely of their making as they reduced my credit limit to the balance then hit the account with a late payment charge then more charges for being overlimit!

 

The second point is that my accounts with B/Card, Citi and Cap One have PPI on them. I considered going for a refund many months ago, but then when things started to get shaky at work I kept up the payments thinking this would be more worthwhile when I got made redundant. When I tried to claim on the PPI though, Barclaycard 'forgot' to send me a claim form until I was actually back in work, and when I did eventually receive details it turned out that I have been paying for all these years for a 'Payment Break Plan' which would allow me to freeze the balance and interest until back in work, not something as I believed which would maintain payments whilst unemployed. I distinctly remember not only that I was told when taking out the card that the cover would keep up payments should I become unemployed, but also that the application would be more favourably looked at if I agreed to the insurance. On that basis surely I would have a good case for a refund of premiums plus contractual interest?

 

For the PPI on the Cap One they also did not come back to me until I was just about to restart work (I was unemployed for three months) and then told me I had to contact AXA to make a claim (funny as I dealt with Cap One, and it was to them I paid the money so why the need to contact AXA myself?). When I phoned to enquire about making a claim I was told that it would be ineligible as I wasn't claiming benefits! As for Citibank, I never received a response at all. Claims are therefore going to be made to all three companies on the basis of mis-selling, but where will I stand if I am (as is inevitable) in default whilst the claim is batted back and forth?

 

Sorry for the long-winded post but the whole thing is getting me down! I appreciate that the PPI part is best answered in the PPI Forum, so will post much of the above there as a separate thread, but can anybody offer some advice on the situation as a whole?

 

Thanks

 

[/Quote]

 

As an absolute novice for reclaiming stuff, I would appreciate some guidance. I have had each of the cards for about 8 years, with increasing balances (for much of the time at least) and consequently increasing PPI payments. Where do I start with calculating what I am after? Do I go for contractual interest (very high on all) or simple? The Barclaycard was originally Providian, then Monument, before Barclaycard, and the Citicard (one of them anyway, as I have two accounts) was Associates I think. I have read from others threads that I may well have to settle down for a long haul - what chance of success do you think I have as I need to get my cards paid off as far as possible to get my head back above water!

 

Thanks in advance

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My first advice would be to start a separate thread for each one,

one for barclaycard

one for city

one for cap 1

 

that way you will be able to keep track on the progress of each one without confusion. This will also enable other caggers to offer advice on similar claims they may be familiar with.

 

Second advice would be to read up on the stickies at the top of the forum here are a couple to start with....PPI - Some Notes for Claimants..

 

Mis-sold PPI? Want your money back? use these links to help

 

I don't know what advice you got in the debt forum but my next advice would be to seek advice from Consumer Credit Coucelling Service (CCCS) or a similar organisation and start up with a debt management plan. Try and get this organised before the default notices start flying. This would not prevent you from still claiming back mis-sold PPI which could go a long way to get your situation resolved.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...