Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is this legal - ESA related


Youslaa
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, last november I started claiming ESA, signed the forms and obviously gave permission at that time for the jobcentre and any other relevant agencies/departments to use my personal details.

 

I stopped claiming in April/May and since then have continued to receive letters from ATOS healthcare about attending for a medical assessment.

 

Clearly therefore, they are still processing my personal and confidential details when they no longer have the authority to do it. I realise that Jobcentreplus may keep my details (which I agreed to) now that my claim has ended as they are not only a government department but also need my details for tax/fraud/repayment purposes etc.

 

However, as ATOS are a private company are they still legally allowed to process my confidential details (relating to my health etc) when I am no longer claiming any benefits. The jobcentre themselves are obviously aware that I am no longer claiming, but they are also aware that ATOS are still processing my details (as they sent me a letter asking why I didnt turn up for an appointment with ATOS). I will shortly be replying to their letter regarding why I didnt turn up (errr, check your system, i didnt need to) and want to know if ATOS still has an legal recourse for processing my data without my permission (permission was withdrawn when I cancelled my claim).

 

If anyone can help it would be much appreciated, because as you can imagine im not happy about being bothered by a company every week who I dont have anything to do with.

 

Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends. Did you ever receive a medical for your ESA? If not they may be assessing whether you are owed any benefit arrears, which if you hadn't already had the medical you would need to have it to see if you qualified for the correct rate at the time of claim (questions from ATOS would be centrered around your health at the time you claimed).

 

Have you contacted the benefit delivery centre to ask why they expected you to attend the medical?

 

Was the medical arranged prior to your ending the claim?

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the reply. Sorry its taken so long to get back, just started a new job - w00t!

 

Basically I was payed for the whole claim, so there wouldnt be any arrears they needed to pay me.

 

Also, I never had an appointment when I ended the claim. The first appointment I was ever given was this one....several months after I ended my claim for ESA.

 

On a side note, this week I received a letter saying I was no longer entitled to JSA....even though the last benefit i was on was ESA so not really sure where they got that from.

 

Also got a letter this week from a company called seetec who help people on ESA back to work telling me I have an appointment with them. However, I also phoned them personally and told them I was no longer claiming.

 

So as it stands Jobcentre+ seem to think I'm on JSA and ESA, and ATOS and Seetec both think I'm on ESA, even though I've informed the jobcentre and seetec that I'm not on either.

 

My word this is confusing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Google for the Information commissioner (ICO) and maybe think about giving them a ring to ask if its worth them looking into it. You will probably just have to complain to the DWP/ATOS to try and get them to stop pestering you though.

Note - all posts are my opinion only, and no action should be taken on any advice given without consulting independant advice from a suitably qaulified advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...