Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescot Credit Services - oh joy!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5373 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody

 

I received a typical 'U OWE US MONEY' letter from wescot last week, with the usual blah blah if you dont pay we'll come and steal your soul nonsense. I'm going to be sending them a lovely cca for that because i'm really not sure the debts mine.

 

However, there is something really quite worrying about the letter. Basically, about halfway down it says the following:

 

'If you ignore the instructions and fail to take action by ........

 

This may result in one of the following

1. Legal proceedings being automatically issued against you in the county court/Sheriff's court - which could result in:

 

  • a county court judgement or decree against you
  • your possessions being seized
  • your debt increasing because of court costs

2. A debt collector being instructed to visit your home and collect the debt personally

 

Now, its that second part. Is it just me or does that sound like they're saying they can send bailiffs round to collect the debt even without a ccj?

 

What do other people think? I'm pretty sure that they can only send bailiffs with a ccj and that claiming to be able to send them without one is illegal. Even if they are just saying they will send them round, it makes it sound like they will legally be able to take things. Surely if they were being honest they would say at the end of part 2....you are not legally required to open the door and pay us/let us take goods without a ccj.

 

Are they being deliberately misleading......if so what should I do in regards to this?

 

Many thanks everyone! Lets keep fighting the good fight :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

2. A debt collector being instructed to visit your home and collect the debt personally

Now, its that second part. Is it just me or does that sound like they're saying they can send bailiffs round to collect the debt even without a ccj?

 

Note they don't use the word 'Bailiff'

 

They simply say 'debt collector'

And as we all know a debt collector has absolutely no legal powers to remove goods or collect money from you, full stop!

 

For anyone to take money off you for an alleged debt, you either have to enter into agreement with them, or they have to take you to court and obtain a CCJ, you then have to default on that CCJ they then take you back to court and ask to remove goods to the value of the debt or obtain other means of getting their mucky paws on your money, ie, a Charging order, attachment of earnings etc.

 

As you may be aware, those types of letter are designed to intimidate the debtors lack of knowledge about their rights and consumer law.

 

It may well be worth registering a complaint to the OFT about the content of the letter, and how it is designed to intimidate and exploit a debtors lack of knowledge:D

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody

 

I received a typical 'U OWE US MONEY' letter from wescot last week, with the usual blah blah if you dont pay we'll come and steal your soul nonsense. I'm going to be sending them a lovely cca for that because i'm really not sure the debts mine.

 

However, there is something really quite worrying about the letter. Basically, about halfway down it says the following:

 

'If you ignore the instructions and fail to take action by ........

 

This may result in one of the following

1. Legal proceedings being automatically issued against you in the county court/Sheriff's court - which could result in:

 

  • a county court judgement or decree against you
  • your possessions being seized
  • your debt increasing because of court costs

2. A debt collector being instructed to visit your home and collect the debt personally

 

Now, its that second part. Is it just me or does that sound like they're saying they can send bailiffs round to collect the debt even without a ccj?

 

What do other people think? I'm pretty sure that they can only send bailiffs with a ccj and that claiming to be able to send them without one is illegal. Even if they are just saying they will send them round, it makes it sound like they will legally be able to take things. Surely if they were being honest they would say at the end of part 2....you are not legally required to open the door and pay us/let us take goods without a ccj.

 

Are they being deliberately misleading......if so what should I do in regards to this?

 

Many thanks everyone! Lets keep fighting the good fight

:D

 

I've highlighted (in red) all you need to know....scare tactics is all it isl

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. know its all scare tactics, I actually laughed when I got that letter. Was just wondering if it was worth a complaint seeing as it was very misleading. After all, the average person who hasnt been fighting these types of muppets would most likely think it meant they could just come around with no ccj.

 

Other than the OFT, should I write anything about it to them when I send off my cca? I was thinking about complaining about the threatening nature of their letter anyway.......

 

Something along the lines of.....I found your letter to be extremely misleading and personally threatening. I am not sure as to why you felt you should be so threatening. I have never heard from your company before, and would have expected you to have at least sent a professional letter informing me of this alleged debt before you decided to start being threatening......................

 

Basically because it sounds a bit condascending......and I do like to annoy these chumps sometimes :lol:

 

What do you think?

 

Will send out the cca tomorrow probably then update if and when i get anything back

Link to post
Share on other sites

They need to arrange an appointment before they visit and with your consent.

They have no more right of entry than the milkman.

Write to them and tell they they don't have your authority to visit and if they do turn up tell them to do one, and call the local Police if they don't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bonzo

 

I'll have to put that in when I send off my cca. Glad i decided to wait til tomorrow to do it.

 

More things to annoy them......mwahahaha!

 

Doorstep collections letter>>

 

I also note it is your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you

 

There is only an implied license under Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and civil action will be taken.

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that pmh, this is all gonna be a nice surprise for them :D

 

My God I love this forum and everybody on it!

 

All this stroppiness on their part already and I havent even been trying to avoid them lol.

 

Ah at least it keeps me mildly entertained. If it wasnt for everybody here I would be so stressed about this so thank you again to everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course make a complaint to the OFT The Office of Fair Trading: Contact us

[email protected]

But as was seen last night, don't expect any reaction, besides they won't look into individual complaints, but will put it in the drawer with all the others and then when that draw becomes full, they empty it out and slap the DCA's wrists:mad:

 

A much better way forward is to make a complaint to these guys;) How to Complain

 

Then these Consumer Direct who will forward your complaint onto your area's Trading Standards as well as the DCA's TS.

 

Complaints - Privacy & electronic communication - ICO

 

Financial Ombudsman Service

 

For Future Reference;)

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Debt collection practices

 

Administration of Justice Act 1970 (c.31)

 

Malicious Communications Act 1988 (c. 27)

 

Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (c. 40)

 

 

Boo;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha I should do that! Funnily enough my partner isnt far off that :D

 

Soory for the no reply, been doing new job related stuff (w00t new job). Actually decided to read the letter properly and its actually for vodaphone so am sending a 'not my debt' letter.

 

Have posted that in another thread here :

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/211694-eek-vodaphone.html#post2322161

 

Thanks for all the replies though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Youslaa,

 

I've already posted in your other thread letting you how you can contact me with your details if you need any further help.

 

Thanks,

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

 

so you havent really helped just ask him to reveal his true identity

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PGH7447 and Youslaa,

 

Just thought I'd come back to the thread to clarify that I work for and represent Vodafone.

 

As you'll appreciate, it's only possible to help customers with account specific queries but having access to their account.

 

Naturally, this contact has to be carried out privately so as to protect the true identify of the poster. Please be assured that we're keen to help, where we can, to get customers' queries resolved as quickly as possible.

 

Hope this helps to clear things up for you both.

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PGH7447 and Youslaa,

 

Just thought I'd come back to the thread to clarify that I work for and represent Vodafone.

 

As you'll appreciate, it's only possible to help customers with account specific queries but having access to their account.

 

Naturally, this contact has to be carried out privately so as to protect the true identify of the poster. Please be assured that we're keen to help, where we can, to get customers' queries resolved as quickly as possible.

 

Hope this helps to clear things up for you both.

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

 

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD YOU CORRESPOND WITH THIS PERSON! ALL THE LEGAL ACCURATE AND UNBIASED HELP YOU NEED WILL BE FOUND HERE ON CAG, NOT THROUGH A TROLL EMPLOYED BY THE ORGANISATION YOU HAVE AN ISSUE WITH.

AVOID AVOID AVOID8)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you'll appreciate, it's only possible to help customers with account specific queries but having access to their account.

Naturally, this contact has to be carried out privately so as to protect the true identify of the poster. Please be assured that we're keen to help, where we can, to get customers' queries resolved as quickly as possible.

 

WHICH IS EXACTLY WHY YOU HAVE YOUR OWN DEDICATED CUSTOMER SERVICE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS.

Youslaa YOU ARE STRONGLY ADVISED "NOT" TO GIVE THIS TROLL ANY OF YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION, INCLUDING YOUR PHONE NUMBER/REFERENCE NUMBER/ADRESS ETC..AVOID AVOID AVOID

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course he isn't just another telephone threat monkey getting above his station, a little like "The Inside Man" the other day, purporting to be a 'manager':lol:

 

It's OK though have already cut and pasted an email to Voda informing them of the potential breach of DPA...:D

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PGH7447 and Youslaa,

 

Just thought I'd come back to the thread to clarify that I work for and represent Vodafone.

 

As you'll appreciate, it's only possible to help customers with account specific queries but having access to their account.

 

Naturally, this contact has to be carried out privately so as to protect the true identify of the poster. Please be assured that we're keen to help, where we can, to get customers' queries resolved as quickly as possible.

 

Hope this helps to clear things up for you both.

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

 

You can help by stopping your company using such tactics as passing "Debts" to DCA's that use such tactics, and by maybe trying to help customers in distress in the first place, or is that too simple for your company and others who at the first sign of a bottom line loss sell these alledged debts on

Edited by PGH7447
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...