Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A judge says Anthony Levandowski carried out the "biggest trade secret crime I have ever seen". View the full article
    • Yes, let us know if they honour the agreement to pay.   Thanks for Donation made and anything further you can make - it helps us keep helping !
    • Mark Bauwens from France takes us through his week during the coronavirus pandemic. View the full article
    • Thankyou very much i will be around all day it would be appreciated Below is another attempt :     IN THE COUNTY COURT AT ***************                 CLAIM NO:**********     BETWEEN:   LOWELL PORTFOLIO I LTD CLAIMANT   and   MRS *********************** DEFENDANT   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   WITNESS STATEMENT OF ******************   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   I, ******************************************* WILL SAY as follows:   I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim.     INTRODUCTION   1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed 10p to 15p in the £1 and to which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Lowell Portfolio I Ltd issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.   2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.   BACKGROUND 3. The Claim relates to an alleged Credit Card Agreement between the defendant and Vanquis Bank   4. Whilst it is accepted that the defendant has in the past had financial dealings with Vanquis, the defendant is unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers, and the defendant has not entered into any contract with the Claimant.   5.The defendant made a formal written request to the Claimant for them to provide me with a copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement as entitled to do so under sections 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on the 27th August 2019 along with the standard fee of £1.00 postal order to which the defendant received a reply dated 6th September 2019 putting their account on hold whilst they tried to gather the information.   6.The defendant received a reply dated 24th October 2019 with no CCA attached other than the documents which enclosed a statement, default notice, notice of assignment from Vanquis to Lowell & a reconstituted copy of an agreement which the claimants have already provided in their witness statement dated 3rd August 2020.   7.On 15th January 2020, I received a claim form from the County Court Business Centre, Northampton, for the amount of £******. The claimant contends that the claim is for the sum of £********* in respect of monies owing under an alleged agreement with the account no ******************* pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA). Contained within the claimants particulars the claimant states that the account was subject to assignment from Vanquis to Lowell on 24 June 2015 with notice given.   CONCLUSION 8.To date no valid full true copy of the executed credit agreement or the terms and conditions have been disclosed .the claimant has no grounds on which to enforce this alleged debt.   9.The claimant disclosed various screenshots taken from the originators software of the application and also confirms on their covering letter the relative legislation The Electronic Communications Act 2000 with regards to wet signatures and the requirement of a tick box to validate the application. The screenshots are devoid of any tick box or any authenticity of IP address conformation check.   10.Therefore the claimant remains in default of my section 78 request and pursuant to section 78 6a of the CCA1974 the claimant is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.   11.For the above reasons the claim bought by the claimant is without merit and an abuse of the court process. It would be far more gracious and forthright for the claimant to admit that they do not have possession of the correct valid paperwork and this is an attempt to mislead and convince the court that the claimant can disclose the legal valid documents on which its claim relies on. It is therefore requested that the Claimants Claim is struck out pursuant to the above.   STATEMENT OF TRUTH   I, ************** the defendant, believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of Court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   Signed: …………………………………………… Print Name: ************* Dated: 4th August 2020
    • Allen Blue, who co-founded professional network LinkedIn, reveals how start-ups can achieve growth. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 8 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
        • Like
      • 16 replies
DB_SamX

3 refusing to cancel new contract - help please (fairly urgent)

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3966 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I need some advice on behalf of my brother please.

 

His 3 contract was coming to its end, and 3 customer services somehow convinced him to upgrade to a N97 on a higher price plan, with the option to return it within 14 days if he still wasn’t happy.

 

Now he isn’t and today is the 14th day.

 

Yesterday, he phone to get the new contract cancelled but 3 customer services were having none of it because apparently, the phone has been used and they can tell by the IMEI.

 

Now he’s strictly adhered to the t&c’s:

 

He has not put a sim in, used any of 3’s services (call, text, internet…), uploaded/downloaded or personalised anything.

 

He has however checked out the menus, and used the internet via home wifi (the t&c doesn’t specifically prohibit this – only use of 3 services is not allowed).

 

Regardless of these fact, 3 refuse to accept the above, stating he’s categorically broken the t&c’s and that is in his notes.

 

Now, I know my brother is right. He does have the address to which to return the handset.

 

  • Considering today is the 14th day, is it sensible to still return it recorded delivery, as well as send a letter of cancellation dated today, disputing their false claims?

  • How can they prove the t&c’s was broken by my brother?

  • If he carries out 1, what is likely to be the outcome?

  • Would it be wise to cancel the DD before the next payment is due or not?

Many thanks.

 

p.s. Yet again, 3’s appalling customer service. I’ve been with them 5 years and have tolerated it. Not anymore I think – cancellation time in 2 months.

 

 

threetermsofpurchase.th.jpg

Edited by DB_SamX

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Old_andrew2018

Sorry I cant read the terms of purchase as they are too small

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for that; corrected hopefully now.

 

 

P.s. Having just popped into the 3 store, the chap said that this return policy only applies to the handset and not the new contract i.e. once anyone agrees to upgrade for another 18 months, there is absolutely no comeback. If that is true, no one in customer services used that argument. Obviously late now but doesn't DSR 7 days cooling period apply to that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I personally got fed up with it and let my brother sort it out in the end. Had to get him to call 3 again despite one of their managers promising to call today. He convinced 3 to offer him the contract for £35 a month for M&M300 + internet (so free) and a £20 voucher + N97 of course.

 

I may not have been so lenient if it was my own phone as I'm more savvy.

 

He was only going to get a HTC magic and a simialar package for £30/month.

 

Now I still don't agree with their customer service, and as such will ask my brother to write a complaint letter to exec office, asking about all the "lies", ignorance, false promises, etc and copy in OFCOM and OTELO. And I won't stay with them despite the £8 off loyalty bonus I've accrued over 5 years or so. The gap between packages between various networks is closer these days.

 

That's assuming there's nothing wrong when they send a letter confirming the price plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are correct on upgrades, they don't need to cancel a contract due to DSR's


If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And for further clarification (to correct a misnomer) nobody's contract 'comes to an end' only the minimum term is reached. If NOTHING his done, then his contract carries on until he gives 30 days notice of cancellation. Upgrades do not have the protection of a 14 days cancellation, and DSR would not apply if the phone was supplied via a retailer - only if delivered by post/courier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So effectively, the common practice of upgrading your phone with another 12/18/24 month min. term deal is purely an extension of your existing contract and DSR doesn't apply as such?

 

If so, and as a lot of phone upgrades (free or at cost) are done over the phone and DSR covers that physical part, what happens if you want to return the phone within 7 days? Do you basically lose out on a hanset (if free, or cost of handet refunded) but nothing you can do on the contract extension?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DSR wouldn't apply anyway - you are enterng into a service contract, and since it is renewing an existing one, there is no provisional period to assess the service. The SIM sontinues as before, and SOGA applies for the handset itself. Once the contract is confirmed then, even with a 'free' handset its residual value it almost nothing. What most people do is SELL the new handset AS new (on an auction site) and pocket the money, continuing the contract with their original handset.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Sticking with the 3 thread but moving slightly, has anyone ever encountered their price plan " promise"

I have a contract with 3 but the deal was 200 mins any network and unlimited text, for £20 pm My first bill come in at £106.00 and when I spat my dummy out it turns out that when I made a 10 second phone call they charged me for the full minute, so my so called 200 minutes soon evaporated, ( i have spoken to the other mobile phone providers and they have said they only chrge to the second and I believe this as I was on a PAYG price plan where I had 100 mins and 200 text, once I'd run out no service) and I can't find anything in the contract or T&Cs to say they charge a minimum of 1 minute per call. It turns out that the so called 200 minutes were used within the first 10 days, with no warning of this, any advise?

Cas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're all doing it now. (Actually, this was how ALL mobile call were billed in 1985 when Cellnet and Vodafone started). Back then they could charge per second, AND provide itemised billing at no charge but times get hard and they find different ways to skin a cat.

 

Since the deal has not really changed - 100 minutes ARE achievable, but since there is a minimum connection of 1 minute, you lose 60 seconds, even if your call is just 5 seconds. This is allowed, and if you think about it, is far cheaper than the fixed BT network, which charges 7p on CONNECTION, then an ongoing per minute fee which is buttons.

 

They've been doing this on contract since 2006 (exact date varies by network) but because ALL contract customers are on the same arrangement, and their tariff sheets do state calls are billed in 60 second increments, there is nothing really you can do - except try to fin another network that isn't so unfriendly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that Buzby

I can't find anywhere on their bills or website that states a minimum of 60 seconds and they refuse to send me a copy of my agreement and T & Cs

so ho hum time will tell

Cas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DSR wouldn't apply anyway - you are enterng into a service contract, and since it is renewing an existing one, there is no provisional period to assess the service. The SIM sontinues as before, and SOGA applies for the handset itself. Once the contract is confirmed then, even with a 'free' handset its residual value it almost nothing. What most people do is SELL the new handset AS new (on an auction site) and pocket the money, continuing the contract with their original handset.

 

A thought crossed my mind: does chaging tariff/minimum monthly charge at the point of upgrade still count as continuation of the existing contract instead of a new one?

 

In my brother's example, he was on M&M300+internet at £20/month and the renewal/upgrade would incur an additional £15/month for the benefit of the new handset (figures not exact).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If no new handset is provided, or if the new tariff is not dependant on a lock-in, then the existing contract rolls on. However if a new phone is provided (as an upgrade) then the contract and its minimum term will restart at whatever the agreed new minimum happens to be. (It doesn;t follow if the first was 12 months, the next will be the same).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Buzby,

Thanks. Struggling to understand however what you mean by lock-in and you last sentence in brackets.

 

Is there also somewhere that explains the difference between extension/new contract in this respect? I don't mind reading it for myself as well.

 

Regards, Sam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no 'extension'. If a contract exists, it will last forever unless recinded or replaced by a 'new' contract. The references to an '18 month contrract' are incorrect, what is meant is there is a minimum term applied before notice of cancellation can be given without a penalty.

 

A lock-in is a fresh minimum term period.

 

Within an existing contract, it is possible to upgrade and sometimes downgrade a tariff without making any material changes - whilst a new handset many not bring with it a new contract to 'sign' it inevitably brings a new contract number, or a suffix ;etter/number to your original contract (this depends on the network).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

New to this forum but very impressed. Does this apply to Carephone warehouse as well?

 

I have just upgraded a long standing CPW o2 contract (12 months of 18 used) and the new mobile (LG Arena) is not fit for purpose (hangs a lot, probably better for pictures etc not business). I had problems after day one and before 7 days sent them a recorded letter asking for my contract to be returned to where it was (including the new incentives on the tariff) but they have written and refused.

 

Intend to return it by recorded delivery and ask them to revert to previous contract position. I did call in to the store to choose it so guess DSR won't apply but members here seem to have threatened providers and they backed down, albeit for different mobile providers.

 

I wondered what type of letter to write and which aspect(s) of the CCA or other laws to quote?

 

I am very used to taking on authority but everything I have read here and elsewhere suggest I have inadvertently, by upgrading, in effect lost the right to even a 7 day cooling off? Failing that what about not being up to the job (fit for purpose)??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid as an upgrade (and an advance upgrade at that) you have no right of rejection. Its suitability for YOUR purpose is not an issue - if the handset is otherwise OK for anyone else, and it is just you who desn;t like it, you're only option is to sell it on privately (keeping the SIM) and using a phone YOU really feel will do the job.

 

They have no interest in you returning a phone that has little or no value to them (they cannot sell it as new). This is a case of you need to be sure you pick the right handset - they are not sold on approval.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks and I understand. It is not that I don't like it, the handset demonstrably hangs and struggles with the volume of email I receive and has other smaller failings which surely make it unfit for purpose? I am aware that changing your mind is not reasonable but I can demonstrate being unfit for purpose- any recourse?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Volume of email should not be an issue - however large emails more properly destined for PCs and heavy on graphics will always be a trade-off - which is why the Blackberry with its dedicated email servers is more 'up' to the job, but it costs extra over and above the cost of the handset.

 

Since the handset can send and recieve email it IS fit for purpose, just not yours. But just like buying a car or a house, you need to ensure the specifications of the product are adequate for YOUR purchase needs. If it isn't, the solution remains, sell it on and buy what will. Nobody provides a free swap if you're choice was wrong. Only if there was an identifiable fault that could be rectified.

 

Find out what your Firmware software level is - there is a possibility that it may well have bneen updated to fix the problems you've identified, and you'll be up and running without difficulty after a re-flash! (This worked for me with the early Samsing Omnia). :)

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice, much appreciated:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard the Arena HAS had a S/w update - check what you have at the moment, and check online for the latest revision. You may be able to do it yourself if your handset missed the update before you bought it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The outcome of this was that I wrote a long detailed letter to 3 wanting answers for everything - why they said he'd used the phone when he hadn't, the lies, false promises about calls, sending out wrong price plans in letters. I also said that I wanted them to somehow make up for all these.

 

They have yet to reply with answers, but someone called my brother and gave him and extra £10/month off. He got an email confirming it.

 

Good outcome from a financial pov but still doesn't make their customer service shortcomings any better. Bit like a bribe.

 

Now, I'm eligible for an upgrade next week. Not sure whether to stick with them because they offered some money off or leave because their CS will forever be rubbish. I get £8/month loyalty discount.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...