Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i recently had 2 bailiffs at my door for 2 parking fines on my car, they said they had clamped it and that if i did not pay £900 today they would take my car away, i told them that it was on finance, they said it did not matter they could still take it for 7 days while they contacted my finance company for them to agree to the bailiffs selling it, paying of the finance and then taking there money, they said if the finance company did not agree then they would return with police and break into my home and take goods, then they would change the locks and i would have to pick up my new keys from the police station. can anyone tell me if this is true as i stupidly paid £740 to cover one of the fines, they said they will return in a week to settle the other fine which means the whole process again. i have looked on the government website but it does not say anything about cars on finance. please help!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

your fees are very large and would suggest that they are also illegal and the fact that they say they would take your car anyway is a threat, i would have thought that you have paid well over the odds already and would request a full list of costs (a snap shot) and they can not refuse this and if they do advise them you intend on taking legal action against them for fraud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolute cobblers.

There is no way they can say those fees are legitimate. It is fraud pure and simple. They have also commited VAT fraud

 

Can you post the name of the firm?

 

The only way they can force entry is if they have peacefully been in your property before and have a walking possesion agreement (a list of your goods)

 

I have never heard of bailiffs calling the Police unless there is good reason for a possible breach of the peace. As for changing the locks that is pure scare tactic.

 

ALL A LOAD OF RUBBISH

 

p.s Also see Happy Contrails letter to send the bailiffs regarding their fees on the newlyn thread posted above this thread today

Edited by danboy381

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiffs are now charging VAT on their fees ?!?!:confused: Thats a new one on me.. hope they are VAT registered

 

 

I would have thought this to be correct as they are a company and VAT is based on there turnover having said that it is the debter that will be paying it and i would have thought that VAT can only be charged on the fees not the debt as most debt alreadt has VAT included so on that debt as it stands at the moment you would pay 30% VAT when it should be 15% this needs looking in to in great detail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bailiffs And Vat

this was posted on the above thread by tomtubby on the 6th 0ctober 2008

 

A bailiff can only charge VAT on his fees when he is collecting certain debts. From September 1994, he is not allowed by law to charge VAT on his enforcement fees when collecting:

 

• Council Tax

• Business Rates

• Magistrates Court Distress Warrants.

• Child Support arrears.

• Income Tax.

 

From September 1998, the bailiff is allowed to charge VAT on his fees for all Road Traffic Debts, unpaid Rent Arrears, Customs & Excise and all other types of distress.

 

I would seriously consider writing to the company to say that unless they can provide details of the relevant statutory to allow them to charge VAT BY RETURN then you will be writing to the VAT office in their area concerning this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, This is the letter i was on about, which I've copied and pasted below.

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by bathy1 viewpost.gif

so where do i go from here ?:confused: dont mind paying the original debt but im not just going to sit back and get robbed!

 

To fix the fee irregularities, send the bailiff the windup letter by post and by email

 

Quote:

The Omnipotent Bailiff Co, Plc

Their Address 1

Their Address 2

Their Address 3

Postcode

 

BY POST AND BY EMAIL

 

DATE

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: [YOUR NAME + REF]: Your fees.

 

I write following visits by your bailiff however there appears to an irregularity with your fees and I am writing to ask you to provide me the following within seven (7) days:

 

1) The name of the court that issued the certificate for the bailiff in charge

 

2) Written confirmation of a) your fees, and b) the original debt

 

3) The name and address of the organisation that instructed you

 

4) a) Truthfully confirm in writing your fees are lawful and comply with legislation or b) refund me the unlawful fees plus reasonable compensation for being cheated by your certificated bailiff with his fees by midday the seventh day from the date of this letter.

 

A bailiff or any other person who dishonestly charges for work that has not been done will be committing an offence under the Fraud Act 2006. Section 2 of the Act specifically describes a person dishonestly makes a false representation and intends, by making the representation, to make a gain for himself or another, or cause a loss to another, or expose another to a risk of loss therefore, if no satisfactory refund is made to me by 12.00 midday seven (7) days from the date of this letter I will automatically file a complaint to police under the 2006 Fraud Act and the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. If you have charged VAT on unlawful fees then you may be reported for VAT fraud and your documents will be given in evidence. If your bailiff is certificated, a Form 4 will be filed.

 

This letter is delivered by Royal Mail and deem it good service upon you by the ordinary course of post under Section 7 of the Interpretation Act 1978. It now is your responsibility and in your best interests this letter is handed to the relevant person within your organisation.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

YOUR NAME

Link to post
Share on other sites

... and btw seanamarts - lots of bailiffs seem to be charging vat these days, and I've caught one already charging vat when they havent been vat registered.

 

scumbags.

oo bet the vat man would love to have a word with them ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you all for your replies, the breakdown i have got on my receipt is:

 

debt to client/inc. court fees £185.00

bailiffs costs £191.99

attendance to remove £290.00

vat on bailiffs costs £ 72.31

 

This is unbelievable!! Marston's bailiffs are more than aware that they CANNOT charge fees such as these and they have had a ruling on the fees that can be charges by the District Judge. They CANNOT charge for clampin a car either.

 

Which local authority does this relate to?

 

In the Sticky section there is a new link to enable the public to search if a bailiff is certificated. I would suggest that you carry out a search.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it relates to barnet council, i have done a search on the bailiffs that attended my property and only one is certified, i am in the process of letting the council know as they are now dealing with this as i have filed a complaint about the whole situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

the bailiffs are from JBW Enforcements not Marstons

 

 

Oh you have your hands full there then with JBW jesus I have never come across such nasty and ignorant people who do not abide by the law stated b y the councils

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...