Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Provident Collecting??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3928 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can I ask which company did Wescot buy the debt from?

 

And how close is it to being statute barred?

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Can I ask which company did Wescot buy the debt from?

 

And how close is it to being statute barred?

 

I was almost going to say it was a Provident deal picked up by Wescot, but from what bsj is saying, it's something totally different.

 

I'm beginning to wonder if one owns the other... :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting this, a company called Fresh Start called me this week on my mobile offering me a 'unique way to clear my debt' I said I wasn't interested and told the caller I was an active member of this forum and was quite capable of dealing with it myself. She then started on some spiel about 'getting it all tied up in one basket' and I told her again to vanish and not call again.

 

Provident lending their own ill gotten gains to pay their own extortionate interest loans sounds like a very back door way of clearing up their dodgy debt to become more 'legal'.

 

You only have to look at Credit Today to see how much Provident are 'forging ahead' in the current downturn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting this, a company called Fresh Start called me this week on my mobile offering me a 'unique way to clear my debt' I said I wasn't interested and told the caller I was an active member of this forum and was quite capable of dealing with it myself. She then started on some spiel about 'getting it all tied up in one basket' and I told her again to vanish and not call again.

 

Mmm... the old Yes Loans technique :rolleyes:

 

You only have to look at Credit Today to see how much Provident are 'forging ahead' in the current downturn.

 

That explains an awful lot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Borrow yourself a dog and next time he comes to the door tell him he has got 10 seconds to get off your property or you will let the dog out.

 

My dog is a great deterrant for salesmen. They take one look at her when she is looking out of the window and leave me alone.

 

I am putting a sign up next week saying 'Salesmen Welcome, Dog Food is Very Expensive.'

 

Lol,i have a very big german shepherd,he barked the whole time the guy was on the doorstep,he did look a little nervous:-D.

 

What surprised me is he was sent to offer a loan to pay off a debt and knew nothing of the OFT guidlines,so i taught him something:-D:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting this, a company called Fresh Start called me this week on my mobile offering me a 'unique way to clear my debt' I said I wasn't interested and told the caller I was an active member of this forum and was quite capable of dealing with it myself. She then started on some spiel about 'getting it all tied up in one basket' and I told her again to vanish and not call again.

 

Provident lending their own ill gotten gains to pay their own extortionate interest loans sounds like a very back door way of clearing up their dodgy debt to become more 'legal'.

 

You only have to look at Credit Today to see how much Provident are 'forging ahead' in the current downturn.

 

It's called fresh start,it ask's me in the letter to quote that when i ring them for my loan.they will wait a long time.:p

 

They don't have my phone number and they won't be getting it,if by chance they do,my answer will be much the same as yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was almost going to say it was a Provident deal picked up by Wescot, but from what bsj is saying, it's something totally different.

 

I'm beginning to wonder if one owns the other... :confused:

 

 

I don't know as yet if the two companies are linked in anyway,i'm having a good look through providents website.

 

I started reading their company reports and have found nothing to link them as yet.

 

Fresh start is not mentioned on the site either,i would of thought it could be found under the services they offer,but thier's no mention of it.

 

I'm also interested to find out if they have a licence for collecting debt's.

 

I'm suspicious that provi are using the "Take out a loan and clear your debt's" route without having the authority to collect.

Edited by bsj
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask which company did Wescot buy the debt from?

 

And how close is it to being statute barred?

 

I am not sure who wescott aquired the debt from.

 

It will statute barred in sept if my memory serves me correctly. I have heard nothing about this debt for a very long time.

 

Provi purchased the debt from wescott.

 

I'm tempted to get a copy of my credit report,but i'm a bit loathe too,as i have read here they possibly flag you up to DCA's.And i have a few small debts from this period,very bad time for me.

Edited by bsj
Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain to your mp and oft and make sure your mp knows you will not accept soundbites or spin but you want presure put on the oft to do there jobs

 

I have put in a complaint to the OFT and trading standards,i will be ringing them again monday morning to update them,i did tell the agent he is breaking the law by harassing me at my home over an alleged debt.

 

I shall follow up with a complaint to my MP on your advice just for good measure.:)

Edited by bsj
Link to post
Share on other sites

If it becomes statute barred in September then that puts you in an excellent position. I would just simply ignore them then send the SB letter when times up.

 

They probably full well know that it's becoming SB, and trying to do everything in their power to get you to pay up because they know they can do diddly squat after SB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have put in a complaint to the OFT and trading standards,i will be ringing them again monday morning to update them,i did tell the agent he is breaking the law by harassing me at my home over an alleged debt.

 

I shall follow up with a complaint to my MP on your advice just for good measure.:)

 

 

Good for you! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it becomes statute barred in September then that puts you in an excellent position. I would just simply ignore them then send the SB letter when times up.

 

They probably full well know that it's becoming SB, and trying to do everything in their power to get you to pay up because they know they can do diddly squat after SB.

 

That's the plan,i did get the impression of deparate measures when i received the letter,i don't have long to wait now,if things get heavy from provi i intend to send the prove it letter,i'll keep baiting till the times up.

 

And to think these people pushed me to the brink of suicide more than once in the past,older and wiser,but the credit has to go CAG.

I spent many months reading before i posted.

As they say knowledge is power:-D

 

A big group hug and flowers for you all,thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basic details for:

 

312029 - Wescot Credit Services Limited

 

Current status:No longer AuthorisedEffective Date:06/02/2009Tied Agent:Undertakes Insurance Mediation:Registered under Money Laundering Regulations:Address:PO Box 137

Dunedin House

45 Percy Street

Hull

North Humberside

HU2 8HF

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Website:

44 01482 590 590

44 01482 590 591

[email protected]

 

Notices:Other information:

 

Found this from a link in an other thread,so wescott continue to sell on debts unlicensed? as well as collect.

Is this worth persuing in my complaint to the OFT? as they sold the debt to provident,will it be relevant?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol,i have a very big german shepherd,he barked the whole time the guy was on the doorstep,he did look a little nervous:-D.

 

What surprised me is he was sent to offer a loan to pay off a debt and knew nothing of the OFT guidlines,so i taught him something:-D:-D

 

I have a German Shepherd puppy. She is 7 months old and stands up at the window whenever someone knocks at the door.

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a German Shepherd puppy. She is 7 months old and stands up at the window whenever someone knocks at the door.

 

 

Another shepherd lover,nice to meet you.

Mine's 2 yrs old,he's a big softie untill someone approaches me.

He throws himself at the front door, full body slam and he has a bark to match his size,he 31inches shoulder height,i'm only 4ft 11in:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted the OFT and trading Standards today.

 

They are looking into wether provident are licensed to collect debt's as they are primarily a loan company.

 

I also informed them that wescott are no longer authorised.

 

They have suggested that that i contact the catalouge company to ask when and if they sold the debt on and to whom.

 

The advisor also said that as i had not heard anything in years it maybe statute barred,(i know it's not far off).

 

When i have all the info from said catalouge company i have to ring them back.

 

As it is so close to sb if i contact them will it be deemed as admition of alleged debt.

 

It did'nt seem very helpful to me really as i know the debt has been purchased by provident so i'm already aware it's been sold on.

 

The OFT clarified that wescott are no longer licensed to sell or collect any debt,i have to forward the letter to them i recieved from provident as they are going to look into their practices of buying debt's when they are a loan company.

Edited by bsj
Link to post
Share on other sites

O.k so i phoned the catalouge company for details of the debt,they were extremly helpful.

 

It was sold to Wescott 9/9/04 so it's won't be sb'd for another year "sigh"

 

Got the month right but not the year:(

 

Why did it take them so long to sell it on if they had it all this time i wonder.

 

I'll have to sit it now an see what comes back from our friendly loan company.Or see if they sell it on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT clarified that wescott are no longer licensed to sell or collect any debt

 

That's very interesting, I had a try it on letter from Wescot last week over a Stat Barred debt. Did the OFT say what they are going to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

statute baring runs from the date of last payment not the date they not the date they sell it on. So it probably is statute barred and you can tell them to fu*k off.

 

Now that's what i like to hear,i did stop paying approximatley a year before that,so in your words they can *&%$£ off then:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's very interesting, I had a try it on letter from Wescot last week over a Stat Barred debt. Did the OFT say what they are going to do?

 

I had to e-mail the letter i recieved to the OFT,they said they will look into it.

It was music to my ears,i did post a reference to Wescott in an earlier post in this thread,thats where i found the info.

 

So i decided to bring to the attention of the OFT,fingers crossed they get closed down:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to e-mail the letter i recieved to the OFT,they said they will look into it.

It was music to my ears,i did post a reference to Wescott in an earlier post in this thread,thats where i found the info.

 

So i decided to bring to the attention of the OFT,fingers crossed they get closed down:-D

 

I think you should do it, especially in the light of what everyone else has said today

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is statute barred, the date of sale has nothing to do with statute barring, the statute date is the last time contact was between you and the lender by way of payment.... if they say £1 was paid towards it just before it was sold ask for proof of who made the payment, you are entitled to this information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should do it, especially in the light of what everyone else has said today

 

 

Oh i definatley will see this out,I'll keep updating the thread:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3928 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...