Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
    • Hi DX - quick question, what is the bank likely to do when they get my letter of change of address ? also what is the worst they can do? thanks J1L
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ex DCA/Bailiff employee here to help Caggers.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5356 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Greetings all,

Firstly I will give a brief explanation of my past....I am an ex-employee of a debt collection / bailiff company who work on behalf of many local authorities / councils. I left this business due to the sickening actions of these rich money grabbing people. There are so many things I could say but again I will keep it brief.

The owners of the business I worked for were adding 'illegal' fees to many accounts and then giving permission to their staff to remove these fees 'if debtors complain about them'.

Many debtors received letters saying they had to increase their payments (on the instruction of local councils) or suffer enforcement action but in truth the councils knew nothing about this at all. As well as this, bailiffs were instructed to leave letters saying that debtors would be made bankrupt if they didn't make payments. I spoke to the CAB who advised me that this is not possible as their debts were usually only in the hundreds of pounds.

There are so many other issues I could go into but I fear this message would continue for far too long. My main issue is the illegal fees, surely the owners could suffer severe action for this?

I don't want go go into names but if there are any trustworthy people out there who believe in this cause as well then I would love to help out, as I feel it is so very unfair to those who are suffering and struggling to make small payments when the owners are making so much from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi justaconsumer-whilst I'm sure that your thread will get a number of reviews and postings it might attract more attention if you revise your title to something a little more eye grabbing like..

 

ex-employee of a debt collection / bailiff company offers advice

 

or something along those lines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree.

Welcome to the site,many of our members are very aware of some of these things that you speak of,in fact many will have experienced at first hand those practices too.

You are more than welcome to the site and if you can help some people then thats great.

I have no doubt that there will be lots of questions coming your way,some of which you will be able to answer some which you wont,by nature of what you have already said here.

I will change your thread title to reflect your comments.

Lets hope that the experience here can be a mutual one and that members may well be able to assist you with things too.

Just be aware that over the years CAG has had many DCAs here in the guise of wanting to help,and others have been here (and still are) for all the wrong reasons...therefore it may take longer for some members to give you their trust than others-its nothing personal,just the way it is.

Edited by MARTIN3030

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I welcome your views, a close friend has a twin brother who is a bailiff and I am getting them interested in this site, the guy is a 'warrant bailiff' for a large company who are used by some to frighten people into payments they can't make.

 

What I want to know is why the councils employ bailiffs in the first place for council tax, I was told 'its in government legislation' but many people, including myself, couldn't afford the £180 a month for council tax, that represented most of my residual income at one point and I got stung for £1,000 by the time fees had been added, I actually owed the council 4 payments!. The upside was once the council realised their 'mistake' I didn't pay any council tax for the following year...

 

The whole debt collection industry as a whole needs to look at the 'added fees' structure. Most people (I think this is at least 65% of people, if not more) want to pay their debts, and often have very limited means and no help from the DSS or whoever... I didn't get help as I wasn't deemed 'vulnerable' and my income was £1.50 over the 'limit'...

 

Bailiff law goes back to 1247 and needs to be brought up to date, and bailiffs (and the police) need to be aware that many of the practices carried out have been illegal for some time now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiff law goes back to 1247 and needs to be brought up to date, and bailiffs (and the police) need to be aware that many of the practices carried out have been illegal for some time now.

 

I absolutely agree SG - I believe we need a campaign to "educate" police forces throughout the UK, too many times we have heard of bailiffs calling the police to assist them and the police taking the bailiff's side. These bailiffs are taking advantage of the fact that most police officers have no idea if they are supposed to assist, but a bailiff waving a"warrant" seems to swing things :mad:

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings all,

Firstly I will give a brief explanation of my past....I am an ex-employee of a debt collection / bailiff company who work on behalf of many local authorities / councils. I left this business due to the sickening actions of these rich money grabbing people. There are so many things I could say but again I will keep it brief.

The owners of the business I worked for were adding 'illegal' fees to many accounts and then giving permission to their staff to remove these fees 'if debtors complain about them'.

Many debtors received letters saying they had to increase their payments (on the instruction of local councils) or suffer enforcement action but in truth the councils knew nothing about this at all. As well as this, bailiffs were instructed to leave letters saying that debtors would be made bankrupt if they didn't make payments. I spoke to the CAB who advised me that this is not possible as their debts were usually only in the hundreds of pounds.

There are so many other issues I could go into but I fear this message would continue for far too long. My main issue is the illegal fees, surely the owners could suffer severe action for this?

I don't want go go into names but if there are any trustworthy people out there who believe in this cause as well then I would love to help out, as I feel it is so very unfair to those who are suffering and struggling to make small payments when the owners are making so much from them.

Based on this your first post, a very warm welcome to you, Justaconsumer. :)

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again all,

I really only started this thread to find out if there was a way to stop these people basically stealing money by adding illegal fees but if I can help anyone in any way then that is even better. I shall be here to answer any questions anybody has.

Thanks for the warm welcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unlawful fees are against OFT guidlines and the CPUTR 2008 (which is law and came in to effect as legislation last year).

 

How did the company that you worked for justify hounding people with these fees?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Babybear,

What the company does is add 'visit fees' on to unpaid road traffic fines when a bailiff hasn't even been allocated to the debt. Occasionally people call up with legitimate reasons why it was impossible that a bailiff could have seen the car (sold it or was in the garage etc) and they just apologise and say it was a mistake and the fees were added by accident. These fees aren't small either, I remember one lady calling asking why 130 pounds was added to a debt when the car wasn't even at her address and no bailiff had called. Basically the company are adding on fees and hoping people don't question it. They must have made thousands just from doing that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Babybear,

What the company does is add 'visit fees' on to unpaid road traffic fines when a bailiff hasn't even been allocated to the debt. Occasionally people call up with legitimate reasons why it was impossible that a bailiff could have seen the car (sold it or was in the garage etc) and they just apologise and say it was a mistake and the fees were added by accident. These fees aren't small either, I remember one lady calling asking why 130 pounds was added to a debt when the car wasn't even at her address and no bailiff had called. Basically the company are adding on fees and hoping people don't question it. They must have made thousands just from doing that.

 

Well then it's your civic duty to report these **** to the police or council and any other clients for FRAUD!!!

 

I sincerely hope you have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

babybear its easier said than done to stop these things from happening.Even with most of these firms aware of sites like CAG -they continue without batting an eyelid.

Justaconsumer was part of a cog that forms the engine-one which covers up more- than a million MPs expense claims.

 

It is regulation and education that will make any change-one firm of bailiffs uncovered will not impact on the rest.

Justaconsumer-since you have worked in these places and ask the question how they can be stopped-you have probably seen more than most -can you give us some more insights into your experiences-for example how far up the chain it goes who is aware ?

and are there individual incentives given for results ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't informed anybody yet, I want to do this properly, otherwise they will just get away with it. They know people in the right places too (the ESA for example).

The 'funny' thing about this is everybody knows they are adding on these fees, the owners, the managers/team leaders and other members of staff but because they seem to have built up this image of debtors being the worst people in the world, the staff just think they deserve it and back up the company. I know they are still doing it now as well.

I don't know if there are incentives further up the chain (it wouldn't surprise me if managers/supervisors get extra to keep their mouths shut) but there were no incentives at all for the general members of staff who take the calls and send out letters etc.

There are other fees added on too, these are legal but extortionate and the councils have the power to remove them but most of them are not aware of them. There is one fee that always baffled me called the 'section 5 head h fee' I think, they described it as a fee 'to put the goods back in the ownership of the debtor after the debt is paid'. Anyone else heard of that one?

Anything else you need to know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a post in the bailiffs section where the have added a fee £24.50 if my memory serves me correct under head h this fee was added the same day as a walking possession fee and levy fee so i know it is an unlawful fee but don't know what a head h fee is

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps I am not drunk my keyboard is recovering from a rain incident and nt all keys work!

:D:lol:

 

I've got one that's had orange juice all over it and makes me spell like a 3 year old..:rolleyes:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...