Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • EU deal replicated 'as far as possible' ... aka less than   "The British Government is continuing to work intensively on securing continuity with other countries. We have secured agreements – either signed or agreed in principle - that account for 64% of the UK’s trade with all the countries with which the UK is seeking continuity, should we leave the EU without a deal."   With what I've seen on that page I linked earlier, that would seem to be decidedly unambitious 'trade deals across the world larger than the EU
    • dx100uk - thank you for your advice.  I will send a SAR to Vanquis and really appreciate all the help on here.   I may have read your last sentence in the way that it was not intended but it has came across very judgmental and not helpful.  I have came on this site for some help, not to be judged.  If that was not your intention then I apologise as I realise text can be read in the way it was not intended.  
    • . I'm sorry but this is not correct. There is a very long established rule that you are required to exercise utmost good faith (uberrima fides) when becoming a party to any kind of insurance contract. This means that you have quite a strict duty to accept responsibility for disclosing any information which a reasonable person in your position might understand could materially affect the risk. I can imagine that the interpretation of this rule would not be applied quite so strictly to a very new and young driver – but the more that one has been driving and the more insurance policies one has held, then I think that the stricter  this rule becomes. It is also well established that one can misrepresent something simply by withholding information – by silence. I'm sorry to say that I think that this rule and the value of it is so self-evident that it is scarcely worth discussing. I wouldn't start raising this issue if I were you with insurers or the courts because you will come away with a bloody nose and loss of credibility
    • @unclebulgaria67 your point is particularly valid especially in regards to loss in the event of a claim. Irrespective of 2x SP30’s or not the vehicle is insured for its full market value. The insurers rating changes based on risk against those endorsements, where said risk calculation isn’t made available.    Also I question the validation of 22% in premium. Is that based on today’s risk profiling, or is that applied retrospectively to day 1 and can that be evidenced.    One thing that is very clear, is that to bring about any degree of misrepresentation the insurer has to have evidence that questions were asked in regards to the endorsements.   This was an auto renewal and when I’ve checked the Brokers electronic Copy on “My Policy’ at renewal, there is no section included relative to accidents in the last 5 yrs or Motoring convictions. Everything else relative to me and the named driver is listed. 
    • Here is what exposes Johnson & Co Commission document, makes for sober reading   Wonder if Snake Oil Singham has read and digested it?   https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/brexit_files/info_site/com_2020_324_2_communication_from_commission_to_inst_en_0.pdf
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
dnbdubs

Help Capquest Next Step

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4010 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

hello Ireiceved a letter asking me to pay up within so many days for a sum of 734.41 which apparntly I owe to capital one or legal action and door step visits etc.

So i sent a cca request to them aswell as telling them my rights about door step visits harrasment and that I do not acknoledge the debt.

Today I recieved two letters from capquest both with the same date, one saying that my account is now on hold for 28days whilst they obtain information and a second saying that "we can confirm that we are only working on behalf of our client, therefore there is no Notice of Assignment" .....what does this mean?? and what is my next step of action, ive only recently turned 19 it is very unlikely that I could have even been put into a credit agreement and I think they believe im an easy target..some help would be much appreciated ! cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're playing games, Capquest are the in-house collection arm of Crap1's. I take it you have never had a CC with them?


Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They're playing games, Capquest are the in-house collection arm of Crap1's. I take it you have never had a CC with them?
nope! that was the first I ever herd of it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm right and you have never had a credit card with Capital One you should make a complaint to the Trading Standards via Consumer Direct Consumer Direct - Contact us and to the OFT debtcollectionguidance@oft.gsi.gov.uk if they continue to pursue you for this alleged debt.

 

If you have any further bother from Capquest or Cap1 just give a shout. ;)


Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I'm right and you have never had a credit card with Capital One you should make a complaint to the Trading Standards via Consumer Direct Consumer Direct - Contact us and to the OFT debtcollectionguidance@oft.gsi.gov.uk if they continue to pursue you for this alleged debt.

 

If you have any further bother from Capquest or Cap1 just give a shout. ;)

 

ta, i think its a bit rediculous they just scare people into giving them money, what should i do in the meantime ie the reply to this they dont have a notice of assignment..does this mean i can tell them with out this they cannot enforce any more action towards me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They're playing games, Capquest are the in-house collection arm of Crap1's. I take it you have never had a CC with them?

 

 

 

I hope you will not mind me correcting you. The in-house DCA of Capone is Debitas; Capquest are an independent DCA and debt purchasing company.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx for the correction ScarletPimpernel

 

If it's not your debt they cannot do anything. One of two things could have happened, someone could have used your identity to create an a/c with Cap1 or they are chasing someone with the same or similar name. If you've recently moved it's probably the latter.


Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it was always Mr A T***** in there letters not my full first name, i never replied using my full first name but now on theese two letter it does have my full first name, shall i just write them a letter saying i still dont acknolwedge the debt and will cease communication until u can provide me with evidential proof that myself have been entered into a credti agreement until such such time i will be reporting this case to the OFT ? obviously worded better and spell checked lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to do anything. The onus is on them to prove that you owe the debt which they can't because they are chasing the wrong person.

 

They are contacting Cap1 to get the information & if they do send a copy of the CCA to you then complain to the ICO because they will be in breach of the Data Protection Act too, so deeper in the brown stuff. ;)


Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i see im sorry to keep going on i just dont understand the second letter, the first one says i dont have to do anything and wait for them to prove.... the second one says that there working on behalf of there client therefore there is no notice of assignment and I have 14 days to reply to that one..can you see what im getting at lol..is that there result for finding the documentation or not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just the normal gibberish that a DCA comes out with, half the time the don't understand themselves what they write. All the notice of assignment means is that their client has sold the debt to them. It is a legal notification which is sent to the debtor to inform them that the a/c has been passed to a debt collector. You would never have received this because it would have been sent to the last known address of the person who actually owes this debt.

 

What has probably happened is that someone with the same name as you has had an a/c with Cap1 & for whatever reason not paid them. They could have died, moved or just done a 'runner' & Capquest have done a search for people with the same name & yours has popped up. When you got their first letter they would have been fishing, and you have taken the bait by sending the CCA request. Because you requested the agreement they'll be 99% sure they've got the right person because in normal circumstances people will ring them up and ask what the hell they're on about or words in a similar vein. ;)

Edited by cerberusalert

Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

oh well, its only cause ive sent a cca request before for an actual debt it put me in the clear that i decided to use one again just thought if i send it it they cant prove anything and then relaise theve made a mistake.... i know what debt collectors are like they come round and **** u off and if sumone turns up at my house i will get ****ed off so a i nce letter will supress the anger lol, we had two people in a van turn up at work to take computers away because apparntly we dint pay business rates which were paid like 7 months prior nd it ended up in two large men getting forced out of the property lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...