Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Reference Fee + Deposit issues!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there I can see a lot of people have the same problem with letting agents trying to con people out of as much cash as possible but I was wondering if anyone could help with my situation. It's in two parts:

 

We moved into this property in June 2008 and stayed there for one year and moved out on the 29th June 2009, after cleaning the new property and handing back the keys.

 

1) I requested a reference from them to move in to a new place which the new letting agents were very understanding and helpful about as they were left waiting. Eventually we moved in without it as the agent and new landlord were satisfied we were of good nature and said the continued delays for the reference was ridiculous and they don't need it anymore as we've already moved in! The old letting agents are refusing to return the fee paid (£35!) as they claim it's already been sent but the new letting agents STILL haven't recieved it. And when we finally demanded to see this reference if they wont pay us back, they handed us a three sentence note which the new letting agent said didn't qualify as a reference as it had no actual detailed information.

 

2) It's now the 18th July, 20 days since we moved out and we are yet to recieve our deposit back. The old agents (during one of the later calls we made to them trying to sort this reference thing out) mentioned they were deducting monies from the deposit and they still didn't have to return it. When I asked what deductions she was talking about, she mentioned a damage in the bathroom (which one of their own decorators did in the final days of our tenancy when he was freshing up the paintwork) dusty/dirty blinds and curtains and other "wear and tear" issues. What are the actual rights of the tenants and what condition is considered wear and tear as I think they are trying to squeeze as much money out of us as possible.

 

SORRY for the long message, but any info and help/advice would be appreciated as I'm not happy with this agents lack of professionalism and blatant rip-off work ethic.

 

Cheers!

Keiichi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Keiichi,

 

I'm not an expert but believe if you paid the deposit in June 08 then the deposit should have been protected by a tenancy deposit scheme (in England and Wales).

 

See this link Tenancy Deposit : Directgov and this post http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/residential-commercial-lettings/117280-tenancy-deposit-scheme.html

 

That first link also gives advice regarding resolving disputes and when you get your deposit paid back. According to that site it is 10 days!

 

If it is protected then I undertand a 3rd party should be dealing with the dispute, not the landlord. If it is not protected I think you can apply to the court to have 3x the deposit paid back!

 

The 1st link gives the information and the 2nd template letters to use to write to them.

 

Regarding the reference letter. I'd argue with them that their fee should reflect costs they reasonably incurred for writing the letter, £35 seems a tad high. Could write and ask them for details of costs they incurred writing the reference?

 

Hope that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey thanks a lot!

 

Yeah when we first signed the contract back in June 08 for the previous house they told us about the scheme, so I know we are protected.

 

I've tried to enquire AGAIN about it and they said the same thing, "we are still trying to work out how much all the deductions are going to come off your deposit".

 

Just like the delayed reference, I think they're just stalling. Is there no way I can force them to hurry along? If I wrote to them, that may help right? Also, how can they hold on to it for so long!? We moved on June 29th!

Link to post
Share on other sites

so we went in again to ask why they takin so long and they said the full list of damages will be sent out friday. they also said we would be lucky to get any of the deposit back and that they may even try and get more off us!! i cant believe them. damages they want to charge us foe include getting a new oven, cleaning all the windows and damage to a bathroom tile which was caused by their decorator when he was repainting the bathroom!! how much of this can they get away wit???

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of it, but going to see them face-to-face instead of writing is not helping matters.

 

You need to start writing letters as previously advised and getting things in writing, do not deal with them face to face.

 

The deposit BY LAW should have been registered with a Tenancy Dispute Service (check directgov link previously posted to be sure it applies, i.e. England and Wales and annual rent over a certain amount).

 

Did you receive confirmation within the 14 days following paying your deposit?

 

If yes, ask if they have passed your deposit to the Alternative Dispute Service for holding until the dispute is resolved as they are REQUIRED TO DO.

 

Plus tell them (don't ask) that disputes must be resolved by the Alternative Dispute Service, NOT THEM and that you will not engage in any dialogue with them on the matter, you will deal with the ADR service as should be done.

 

If they did not send confirmation within 14 days following paying your deposit write in your letter that they have broken the law and if they do not refund your deposit in full within 7 days you will apply to the courts and advise them they will be instructd by the courts to pay 3 x the deposit.

 

Keep it short, sweet and to the letter of the law. Do not engage in discussions regarding dispute with them, no matter what they write back.

 

Do not engage them face-to-face or by telephone, get everything in writing. You need correspondence in writing to support your case.

 

Most importantly you must follow through. If they have not protected your deposit they will be made to pay 3 x the deposit, simple as.

 

Have you read the directgov link? It explains everything there.

 

Suggest writing something along the lines of below:

The premises were left clean and in good repair when the tenancy ended, you are therefore required to return my deposit of £xxx.

 

As the deposit was paid after 6th April 2007, the landlord or letting agent is legally required to ensure the deposit is protected by a deposit protection scheme.

 

You the agent or the landlord were also legally required to supply me, within 14 days of receiving the deposit, confirmation that the deposit was protected and further additional details including contact details of the tenancy deposit scheme, landlord or agent contact details, how to apply for release of the deposit, information explaining purpose of the deposit and what to do if there is a dispute.

The law also requires that at the end of the tenancy the deposit should be returned within 10 days. If there is a dispute the deposit must be handed over to the scheme for safekeeping until the dispute is resolved by the scheme, please confirm that you have done this.

I would like to advise you that if you have failed to protect the deposit then the courts can order you to pay 3 x the deposit.

Please reply within 7 days of the date of this letter with the following:

-Confirmation that my deposit is held with a deposit protection scheme

-Confirmation of the type of scheme, scheme administrator and procedure for dispute resolution

-Confirmation that you have passed my deposit to the scheme for safekeeping until the dispute is resolved.

Failure to provide this information or a response that there has been a failure to comply will result in application to the courts for an order to pay 3 x the deposit on the basis of the failure to comply with the requirements of the tenancy deposit scheme.

I look forward to your prompt response.

 

Send it Special Delivery and do not engage in discussion regarding the issues they are disputing, this is for the ADR service, NOT them. Do not be tempted to respond to or justify any of the damages they claim you are responsible for. This is for the ADR to resolve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot. I'm not sure where to start with this, they have said they are sending the full list of damages and deductions on Friday (reviece on Monday) so maybe I should wait to see what they finally decided before writing them the letter??

 

Also, I'm looking over the original contract and theres little mention of any or which "deposit scheme" its protected under, only mentions Housing Act 2004 and names the Letting Agent themselves as the Deposit holders? It also says any disputes should be forwarded to mydeposits.co.uk and they'll mediate?

 

I'm also pretty sure that they did mention the protection of the deposit when we first signed the contract but they were also meant to send confirmation of this protection within 14 days, right? Not just the information that was on the contract, i.e deposit holders name/contact details.

 

Relly appreciate your help guys so far btw! It's been great advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can check if its actually registered with Mydeposits on their website.

My deposits is an insurance backed sheme with the lanlord/agent actually still holding ( ie getting interest or using the money for something else ).

If a dispute is registered and I would do this straight away with MD, the landlord/agent has to give the money within 10 days to MD. and they hold it from then on until the despute is resolved, the scheme then guarantees that you will get any monies due even if the LL/agent do not hand over the money. You also can take the LL/agent to court for the return of the monies if they dont accept TDS resolution process. It is all in your favour.

Check with MD first, lodge dispute then write a letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok so I'm still waiting for the deposit protection certificate to be sent to me as it wan't sent to us originally. Should I write to the LA requensting some info about the deposit as we are now over one calendar month after our move and still no news. Or should I wait to get the dpc so I can ofiicially claim a dispute?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, you shouldn't wait. If you haven't got your certificate now its already far too late. You've been given advice several timers now and you keep ignoring it. All you're doing is demonstrating to the landlord that you don't know what you're doing and that it will be very easy for them to keep your deposit. You need to start making things a little more awkward for them.

 

Send the letter below by special delivery

 

Kanine99's Address 1

Kanine99's Address 2

Kanine99's Address 3

Kanine99's Address 4

 

 

 

Date

 

 

Landlord's name

 

Landlord's Address 1

Landlord's Address 2

Landlord's Address 3

Landlord's Address 4

 

 

Letter Before Action

 

Dear Sir

 

On 29th July 2009 I moved out of the property at . Despite repeated request via , you have still not returned my deposit. If you do not send me the deposit in full within 7 days of this letter I will instigate legal proceedings without further notice.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

 

Kanine99

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't mention whether a proper checkin inventory, which you agreed and signed, was done when you took on the tenancy. If not, they will be unable to deduct anything from the deposit since they will not be able to prove that the condition of the property at the end of the tenancy was any different from the condition of the property at the beginning of the tenancy.

 

Follow the instructions you have been given by other posters here. Don't wait for any rubbish list but get on and show this LL and LA that you mean business and will not be bullied.

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, and it's not that I'm not ignoring the advice, I tried to see if I could file a dispute and was told I needed this Deposit Protection Certificate to do it? I just thought, if I'm going to possibly file a dispute I wanted to make sure to have it before sending the letter and making it all official.

 

Oh anyway, hows this for the letter, I'll send a.s.a.p:

 

 

 

Dear Sir

 

On 29th June 2009, I, Mr. Kanine99, along with Mr. 01 and Mr.02, moved out of the property at XXX in good, clean condition as inspected by an agent from L.A. It is now over one calendar month since the move and despite repeated requests via L.A., you have still not returned our deposit of £XXX. If you do not send the deposit in full within 7 days of this letter I will instigate legal proceedings without further notice.

 

The law also requires that at the end of the tenancy the deposit should be returned within 10 days. If there is a dispute the deposit must be handed over to the Alternative Dispute Service for safekeeping until the dispute is resolved by the scheme, not you, please confirm that you have done this.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

Kanine99

 

:???:

 

And they did do an inventory at the start of the tenancy but it was all marked as "good condition" so I hardly think we left ANYTHING that was in anything less than good. Would it be worth saying that anything stated as "good" is.. well just that, "good", not "excellent" or "brand new" condition? So how can they say we left it in such a terrible state... oh and on the way out they didn't bring an inventory to do the check so we let them use our original moving-on one, which they took away with them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what you mean by you let them use your original one. Is there a checking out inventory but it's a copy of the checking in inventory? Or did the agent take your copy of the checking in inventory away when they checked the property at the end of the tenancy? Was/were the inventory/ies signed by anyone and if so who?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so now that be letter has been sent, what are the actual possible outcomes/reactions? I mean, if they get back to me with full deposit thats a result bt for example...

 

1) If they refuse to return the deposit in full bt deductions are fair?

 

2) If they reply with unreasonible amount of deposit and i want to dispute?

 

3) If they reply and say they are fightin and want to take further, i.e court?

 

4) Dont reply at all/ within 7 days given?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, we gave the agent who checked the property on the way out the copy of the check-IN inventory we had in our file. During the check-in check, we looked over the basic condition of the place which was all stated as "good" and so we signed it.

 

Now, on the way out, they came to inspect without an inventory so we said we still has our original check-in inventory so let him use that to look over the condition of the place, which he said was also all good except the oven which needed a proper clean quoted as £60, which we agreed to pay.

 

So they took our original check-in inventory which also had our signatures as we signed it on the way in, but we never signed anything on the way out. If they try to use that original inventory as proof of signing out, it'll be false as the third tenant was actually already vacated 2 weeks beforehand and was not present at the check out day, so his signature on the inventory shows it was the check-in one and no check-out inventory was given or signed.

 

Makes sense????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a letter from them today regarding how much they are deducting for damages.

 

The original deposit was £1300.00, and they are deducting £1311.00, so they are now demanding we pay them the "outstanding balance".

 

The list of damages include cleaning the oven £75.00 (originally quoted as £60), a damage to the downstairs toilet (which was actually caused by their workman when repainting the toilet) and damp in the downstairs cloakroom which amounted to about £650?

 

Basically they saying we owe them the monies.

 

I'm obviously going to dispute this as its ridiculous. Do I need to reply to them with a letter or do I just fill in a form for processing?

 

Thanks again guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So have you actually confirmed with the TDS that your deposit is protected?

On mydeposits' website, it was registered as protected, yes. Do I need to let a ceartain body know, now that we officially have a dispute with the deductions? And is there any thing else I should do before pursuing this in court??

Link to post
Share on other sites

My deposits is an insurance backed scheme, so you lodge a dispute with them and the LL should now handover the disputed amount to them until resolved. You should now lodge a dispute with them and copy all correspondance to the dispute resolution team. if LL does not handover amount or does not abide by resolution the scheme will pay you out either from the amount handed over or from the insurance scheme then they will persue LL for monies. so you should get your money. You also have the option to go to court; but they will take a dim view if you have not let the deposit scheme try to resolve it first. thats why it was set up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to lodge a dispute with them before but they were askin for the deposit protection certificate number to do it? which we never recieved so i wrote to them requestin a copy... (see previous post)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any more help pls?

 

I cant seem to be able to lodge my dispute on mydeposit witout the dpc number but we never recieved one. I wrote to mydeposit requestin a copy of it but theyve yet to send anythin to us,.. is this the only way i can dispute and if so, shouldnt i have recieved a copy of the dpc??

 

One other thing. One of the so-called damages caused was due to their bath/shower not been properly sealed where a glass sqiveling guard meets the bath rim, so everytime the shower was used, it leaked under the bath and down to the ground floor room. How can we be blamed for somethin that we obviously have no control over such as water leakin through the shower? Theyve since had the guard perminantly sealed to the bath now so it cant be moved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...