Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charging Order Preference of Order?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5353 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have a legal charge of registered estate on my brothers house (only his name is on the deeds) and I have since found out that he owes large sums of money (unsecured loans) to 4 or 5 credit companies.

 

I am concerned as to just how safe my share of the property is. If any of his creditors put their own charge order on the house, does their order get paid before mine ? or is it on a first come, first served basis after the mortgage lender has received their share.

 

What happens if he declares himself bankrupt ?

 

Any advice much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

There is a pecking order based upon who registers their charge first.

 

If the other creditors are currently unsecured you would be paid prior to them.

 

Hope this helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have a legal charge of registered estate on my brothers house (only his name is on the deeds) and I have since found out that he owes large sums of money (unsecured loans) to 4 or 5 credit companies.

 

I am concerned as to just how safe my share of the property is. If any of his creditors put their own charge order on the house, does their order get paid before mine ? or is it on a first come, first served basis after the mortgage lender has received their share.

 

What happens if he declares himself bankrupt ?

 

Any advice much appreciated

 

Thanks for the info. Just want to clarify that a pecking order exists whether or not my brother declares himself bankrupt? All his creditors are unsecured, but Ive heard that once a debt agreement is cancelled due to lack of payments, the money owed can be turned into a secured one in the form of a charging order on the property, if thats the case, would a pecking order continue to exist ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info. Just want to clarify that a pecking order exists whether or not my brother declares himself bankrupt? All his creditors are unsecured, but Ive heard that once a debt agreement is cancelled due to lack of payments, the money owed can be turned into a secured one in the form of a charging order on the property, if thats the case, would a pecking order continue to exist ?

 

it can be turned into a secured debt. the creditor would need to issue court proceedings to obtain a CCJ, they would then need to issue more proceedings to apply for a charging order. the process can take a good 6 months. the pecking order would be the same if he was to go bankrupt. is there equity in the property and how long have you had the charge?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it can be turned into a secured debt. the creditor would need to issue court proceedings to obtain a CCJ, they would then need to issue more proceedings to apply for a charging order. the process can take a good 6 months. the pecking order would be the same if he was to go bankrupt. is there equity in the property and how long have you had the charge?

 

The house is a small terraced worth 70K. My brothers mortgage is 55K. My share is a minimum value of 17K or 25% whichever is the greater at the time of sale. Looking at the figures, its safe to say that what equity in the property wont even pay my 17K minimum which was agreed when the charging order was made. Ive had the charging order for 2.5 years. The agreement I made was that my brother could not borrow any loans secured on the property that would jeopardise my 25%, which he has adhered to as all is debt was taken out unsecured.

 

I guess in the event of a sale, the mortgage gets paid off in full then whats left goes down the pecking order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I guess in the event of a sale, the mortgage gets paid off in full then whats left goes down the pecking order.

 

Absolutely. You're the second charge holder so would be paid after the mortgage.

 

I really must add that I'm not sure Bankruptcy is the right option for your brother as it could really implicate you. Since the charge was made within the last 5 years and you're related it may be viewed by an Official Receiver as a pre-bankruptcy irregularity or even a pre-bankruptcy offence. I strongly suggest that he gets some impartial debt advice from one of the debt-advice charities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The charging order was put on the property by means of inheritance, and I have the death certificate to prove it all happened within months of the passing of my mother, as well as solicitor documentation.

 

I will be speaking with my brother again to see what advice he has been given.

 

Thanks again and have a great weekend

Link to post
Share on other sites

The charging order was put on the property by means of inheritance, and I have the death certificate to prove it all happened within months of the passing of my mother, as well as solicitor documentation.

 

aha... the previous note about implications with bankruptcy are not relevent then. Hope that clears things up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi again

 

I just wanted to update this thread a little.

 

My brother has received a letter from the Land Registry 'B132 Notice to a registered proprietor of an application to enter an agreed notice'

 

The application was lodged by his creditors solicitor company.

 

On the letter it says:

 

"As a result of this application the following entry has been made in the Charges Register of the above title number"

 

"Equitable charge created by an interim charging order of the Gateshead County Court dated 1 August 2009 in favour of "

 

As far as I am aware, my brother has not yet filed for bankruptcy. Im assuming that this recent charging order goes 3rd in line after my own charging order as per our previous discussions in this thread (the pecking order) ?

 

In the event of a sale of the property, once the mortgage has been paid off in full, Im next in line, and therefore I would receive 100% of my entitlement or would the remaining equity be split a certain % between each individual who has a charging order on the property ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Here is another update:

 

 

Ive been sent notification from his creditors solicitors, who have said that I dont need to respond to their letter unless I intend of going to the hearing.

 

I understand my brother can object to the 2nd charge being made and perhaps I could also if I felt the charge would put my interest at a disadvantage.

 

However, there isnt enough equity in the property to cover my charging order let alone further orders.

 

Current house value = 70K. Mortgage gets paid off first (55K) = 15K

Im left with a 2K short fall.

 

What would happen if my brother declared himself bankrupt -

Would the official receiver would take the property as an asset, and any equity would then be shared fairly amongst creditors?

 

My question is, just how fairly would the equity get shared ?

 

Im owed 17K, one of his creditors is owed 11K and another creditor is owed 1.4K (but the 3rd creditor hasnt got as far as putting an interim charge on the property, yet - they could do in due course, only time will tell)

 

Would the distribution be as a proportionate % or split 50/50, ie. myself and the 2nd creditor get 7.5K each ?

 

If, the outcome at the court hearing was that the charge isnt granted, could his creditor force him to go bankrupt ? If so, how would my charging order be affected ?

 

Can my brother object to the Interim Charge Order that his creditor has placed with the land registry, by calling the lang registry and simply stating the reasons why he objects ?

 

Will the interim charge order prevent sale of the property before the court hearing ?

 

Any advice much appreciated as Im really at loose ends with all this. The stress its causing to me and my partner is getting unbearable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...