Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thats because this claim has not been allocated as yet hence the above hearing *Case Management " to determine the directions (N157 Notice of allocation) which will follow after this hearing. You are not requested to submit a statement but have all the details with you (claim form defence CPR CCA etc etc)   Andy
    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Orange/Arrow/Fredrickson


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5201 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a couple of phone calls last week, asking if I was ABOAP, I refused to respond after dealings with DCA's over another matter.

 

Today I received a letter from Fredrickson International who are instructed by Arrow Global asking for immediate payment of £200 (approx). I believe this is for the outstanding amount to Orange when I ported my number to o2.

 

I have checked my credit report and it has me defaulted since Sep 06 on an account opened June 99.

 

What should my response to Fredrickson be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You may be able to negotiate partial payment, you could write to them and make them an offer, but matters would proceed more quickly by telephone.

 

If your going to make them an offer I'd suggest you offer at least 50%-60% of the debt, anything less and they are unlikely to take you seriously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be able to negotiate partial payment, you could write to them and make them an offer, but matters would proceed more quickly by telephone.

 

If your going to make them an offer I'd suggest you offer at least 50%-60% of the debt, anything less and they are unlikely to take you seriously.

:eek:

re above dont do anything over the phone do it all in writing so you have a paper trail and cant be bullied into paying what u cant afford

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed. One person may say its OK to part pay and someone else denies it. However, the damage to your credit file is done - that chances of you being taken to court are slim so the weight of the DCA is usually limited to coercing you to make a payment of some sort, and move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

In the same boat here, Arrow are the biggest wasters so far. First and foremost, SAR them, even though its not covered under the usual credit regs you can still insist on everything they hold using the Consumer credit act and data protection act.

 

Once you have all the info, which 9 ou of 10 times they will not be able to provide, you can make an educated decision on what action to take. If they can't provide any account info or prove debt, then your onto a winner.

If the last interaction on the account was over 6yrs ago it will certainly be Statute barred and therefore unenforceable in court.

 

Arrow are specialist idiots when it comes to buying up bulk debts that are already barred. They are extremely cheap to buy and they only nee to convert 1% to make a profit, most people don't understand the law relating to statute barred accounts and just pay up.

You should NEVER acknowledge any debt, instead make them prove it exists, which most of the time they just cannot do.

 

J.:)

Consumer Action Group, the forum for all of us.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE...

 

The loonies at arrow are really hitting new depths, let me enlighten.

As we are all aware by now, it is wholly illegal to continue ANY recovery actions if an account is either A) IN DISPUTE

B) SUBJECT TO PENDING COURT ACTION

 

Being as my own case is now both of the above, ie i am counter suing them for being bloody idiots! but they have now tried (and failed) to threaten me with legal action if i don't pay up... (on a debt that does not exist !)

 

Ok, so they clearly have no idea what they are doing, but does this not clearly show what a complete ****e state the industry is in. They are in breach of so many laws i don't know which one to quote first, and where is the protection for the consumer ???? it does not exist, these parasites are allowed to operate at will, only when someone stands up and says NO is something muted in the way of correction...... sick!

 

Oh by the way, they did manage to send a statement, guess what.... Statute Barred ! so they are enforcing recovery on something that is legally non recoverable, borderline fraud and definately another nail in their coffin.

It just goes to show, you absolutely should not agree to pay anything unless it is proven beyond any doubt that there is something to pay.

 

This site has been a real eye opener for me and I guess a whole lot of others, if reading the forums is anything to go by. I am forever grateful to the many that have offered unbiased and intelligent advice, it's very true that there is strength in numbers.

 

J.

Consumer Action Group, the forum for all of us.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE+++++

 

Ok as expected, received no less than 3 envelopes this morning, a little strange I thought so I was eager to see what was enclosed.

 

Envelope 1) A copy of the rubbish they had already sent me, which only confirmed that they had broken the law and were involved in fraud by trying to obtain money by menaces!

 

Envelope 2) Well this was the icing on the cake, a full and complete appology with a pathetic attempt at " we did not know" therefore were innocent....

The final line stating we will no longer be recovering this account.

What a total bunch of +~!^**

 

Envelope 3) Court papers attempting a stay of one month on all proceedings so that an agrrement can be found to settle the outstanding issues.

Outstanding issues meaning.... the illegal placement of default markers on my credit file when there was no debt to recover in the first place.

The illegal sharing of my information between them and two other parties when they had no right or authority to do so.

The continued enforcement of recovery methods even though the account was clearly in dispute and therefore excluded from enforcement.

 

Luckily I have a friend who is a practicing solicitor, here is where the real difference of opinion comesin, I was willing to let them off with a slapped wrist from the court and a little pocket money to help along the way. He however has advised suing them for up to £5k as it is clear they are backpeddaling fast and want an easy out.

 

Will have to think on this one, mind you it would make the pill easier to swallow if i could really hurt these parasites.

Will update further as it happens.....

 

Keep up the good fight everyone, we will win in the end !!!!

 

 

Jetbags:)

Consumer Action Group, the forum for all of us.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've read a few threads from people in similar circs with orange/fredrickson, but still not sure from reading them what my next move should be. Fredrickson have started vigorously contacting me again now that they have sent the statements.

Should I send a SRA and if so who to? How do I get them to prove that Arrow have a right to claim this debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the sar goes to orange, this should show all the documentation and whether the debt has been assigned/sold whatever to fredricksons..it cost £10.00 and i believe they have 30 days to comply..tell fredricksons account in dispute until you get the information

do not talk to them on phone if they ring put phone down, or refuse to go through security..in fact you can have endless fun with them..pretend to be deaf..go make a cup of tea...there are numerous scenarios to wind them up with

Link to post
Share on other sites

After sending the 'prove it letter' I've had a response with Ornage statements. I've been advised that my next move should be to SAR orange, but I'm confused by this as Fredrickson have never mentioned Orange except to send statements from them when I asked them to prove the debt to Arrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the statement very very carefully, they have a tendency to cut and paste a lot of their material to make it look authentic, when in fact its a complete forgery.

Also check the date of the last transaction, if it's more than 6 years old then it's statute barred and unenforceable in law, a counterclaim should then be started by you to claim for intrusion and damages, liability set at no more than £5k

There are thousands of alleged debts being chased off the back of bogus outstanding mobile phone contracts at the moment, you have to follow due dilligence and process to show that you have tried to uncover where the debt(if any) really is, so SAR orange and also demand full disclosure by Frederickson of all data held, including screen shots of the account they hold on you.

When you have alll the info you can make a judgement as to whether it's real or not. Like most you will find that it's a case of a **** bag debt collector trying to extort money by menaces( which is still illegal in the UK) out of what they see as an ignorant general public who do not understand the law, thanks to this site, that is no longer the case though....

 

GOOD LUCK!!

 

Jetbags

Consumer Action Group, the forum for all of us.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...