Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Dont Except Fee For CCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5236 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes. Then see what happens. If no agreement by then then put the account in to dispute until one is produced (if it can be of course) ;)

Edited by DDWales
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all, have just received this from Cabot.

Sent account in dispute letter 3rd August 2009 ( 1st recorded ) and today have received this back from them, also have just received letter from shop direct (kays)another debt being dealt with by Credit account managers ,stating they cannot find agreement, and as this ( great universal ) account was opened at same time, i doubt that they have agreement for this one either anyway ,this is the letter.

What do you think ???

have they got a right to update CRA ?

thanks.Steve

 

cabot_0001-1.jpg

 

cabot_0002.jpg

Edited by littlefatbudha
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Seminole, the account balance was about £90, but the default amount showing on experian is £192.90, also have found some old statements which include charges, so i feel this is adverse, what would you suggest i do, thanks, is there a letter which can be sent? Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

In regard to the letter above , cabot have now stated there is no CCA for the account but they have a legal right to update CRAs, i already new there was no CCA , as with all catalogues you never had to sign anything, just call them up ask for a catalogue and order over the phone.

if they would have excepted the offers that i could afford then shop direct would of been paid off by now, but because they were rude and did not listen, they shot themselves in the foot.

How can they state that they have a legal right without there ever being a CCA between mysel and shop direct.

Cabot state they own the debt, even though i never received termination, default, or notice of assignment, to which Cabot state they sent notice of assigment, and they say it does not have to be by registered post.

Also they state they are entitled to charge interest, as stated in the original agreement, even though if there was an agreement it was 0%, can i take Cabot to court, seeing as there is no notice of assignment ,CCA, default or anything else, i want to make Cabot pay for their LIES

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi guys, just an update, cabot have sent the letter below, to which they state, "that they purchased the account in july 2008, and also that shop direct have not come up with CCA", no suprise there , never received one, just got catalogue and placed order over phone, no need to sign or agree with anything.

Anyway as they state they purchased the debt to which( i received no notice of assignment) do they have any legal right to be updating CRA's and could they still send notice of assignment letter, even though they have been updating CRA's for over a year.

Is there a letter to send and if they do not comply , i would like to take them to court,many thanks.

 

IMG-4.jpg

Edited by littlefatbudha
Link to post
Share on other sites

These clowns are taking the p**s. If they can't produce the credit agreement how exactly can they show there was a debt to assign?

 

I'd be tempted to write back telling them in no uncertain terms that unless this is rectified very quickly the next communication they receive will bear a court seal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies, i just have a few questions.

Have these two companies broken the data protection act by:

1) shop direct selling the account with no notice of assignment.

2)cabot updating CRA's with no signed agreement, or any lawful notice of assignment.

3) on a shop direct agreemenyt i was sent for another account opened at roughly the same time,(no signatures,this is what it would have looked like,blah,blah) it does not state anything regarding, using data, for updating CRA's etc.

4) in the terms and conditions, on another page,not the side that would hold signature, it states, "we may transfer all of our rights, duties and obligations, under this agreement to any person or arrange for anyperson to carry them out on our behalf, without giving you notice.Any such transfer will not affect your rights under this agreement, or any other legal rights you may have, such as under the consumer credit act 1974.

You may not transfer your rights,duties or obligations under this agreement.

5) i do not give permission for either to be using my data.

Have i got a case against either company involved,do you think.Thanks.

Edited by littlefatbudha
Link to post
Share on other sites

See the bits in red

 

Thanks for the replies, i just have a few questions.

Have these two companies broken the data protection act by:

1) shop direct selling the account with no notice of assignment.

 

If they tried to take you to court, they would have to prove they sent it

 

2)cabot updating CRA's with no signed agreement, or any lawful notice of assignment.

 

The Information Commissioner has said that because they can prove the link between you and SDG (statements) they can update your credit file even though there is no signed agreement. They only way I have seen so far to get the info removed is to go to court.

 

3) on a shop direct agreemenyt i was sent for another account opened at roughly the same time,(no signatures,this is what it would have looked like,blah,blah) it does not state anything regarding, using data, for updating CRA's etc.

 

If it's not in the T's&C's then I don't think they can do it

 

4) in the terms and conditions, on another page,not the side that would hold signature, it states, "we may transfer all of our rights, duties and obligations, under this agreement to any person or arrange for anyperson to carry them out on our behalf, without giving you notice.Any such transfer will not affect your rights under this agreement, or any other legal rights you may have, such as under the consumer credit act 1974.

You may not transfer your rights,duties or obligations under this agreement.

 

This is true IF the DCA are collecting on behalf of the OC but if the account is sold to a DCA that is a different matter

 

5) i do not give permission for either to be using my data.

Have i got a case against either company involved,do you think.Thanks.

 

If you want to get legal, yes

 

Check out sections 136 and 196 of LoPA 1925

 

Law of Property Act 1925 (c.20)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they broken the data protection rules, by processing data about me, without legally owning the account, as by not receiving notice of assigment, sent by required terms, and never received one at all.

Would this be enough to have them taken to court, and would they receive a fine for this as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they broken the data protection rules, by processing data about me, without legally owning the account, as by not receiving notice of assigment, sent by required terms, and never received one at all.

Would this be enough to have them taken to court, and would they receive a fine for this as well.

 

You could take them to court for disclosure, then they would have to prove a NOA was sent but they wouldn't get a fine.

 

If you complained to the OFT they would add it to their (growing) list of complaints and eventually investigate.

 

You could complain to the FOS but you need to have exhausted Cabot's complaints procedure first.

 

I SAR'd Cabot and they sent a very comprehensive set of account activity and it showed dates of letters sent. I'm still trying to find out which one from the codes supplied.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Have sent Letter Before Action, this is their reply, it also states in the letter store card, this was not a store card it was a catalogue.

I am going to need help with POC as i feel that not ever receivindg default notice, or notice of assignment, they dont have any right to process my data

I also like the bit at the end of this letter, it was assigned on or about ** ** 2008, they dont even know the date.

Am i right if i report them to the FOS they will have to pay £400 for the investigation.Please help.LFB

IMG_0001-7.jpg

Edited by littlefatbudha
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...