Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft Advice Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon everyone, am very new here, been reading the threads for a few days now.

 

I have just received a letter from Moorcroft Debt Revocery Limited.

 

The Letter is as follows:

 

Moorcroft Debt Recovery Limited

~ Pre-Court Division (IN RED)

 

NOTICE OF INTENDED LITIGATION

 

Dated 10/07/2009

 

To prevent the above action please send payment before 17/07/09 or Telephone 0161 475 2876 immediately.

 

Current Balance: £313.85

Solicitors Costs For Issue of Claim Form: £50.00

Court Fees for Issue of Claim Dorm: £40.00

Solicitors Costs For Issuing Judgement (by Default): £25.00

 

Total Debt (if judgement is obtained) £428.85

 

 

 

---

 

 

So i called them to dispute the debt ( to Studio Cards & Gifts ) and was telling them i never owe this money.

 

They said they will put a hold on the file whilst they investigate. He put my phone call on hold for a minute whilst he checked something with another colleague. When he came back he said he needs to see a copy of my signature to check against the files that Studio Cards hold:

 

I said, after taking advice, I will not be prepared to send my signature to you. ( After reading many cag threads, i have seen mention numerous time that you should never SIGN letters but PRINT them, so I thought, NO WAY MR MOORECROFT)

 

He then said that he would be unable to continue with the hold on the file and has re-opened it.

 

I said to him that I believed that once I had made my notification that the account is in dispute, that is against thr rules to continue chasing this debt. He said he was quite within rules and regulation as i owe this debt.

 

Then after putting the phone down, 15 minutes later i received a phone call form Moorecroft DR, demanding I pay the balance there and then, even after I informed him that this case is now in dispute.

 

Can anyone give me some advice, should I send a CCA Request for the Credit Agreement.

 

 

Thanks in advance

 

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes & refuse to speak to them on the 'phone, tell them everything must be in writing.

 

send them a cca request by return make them work for it, and dont speak to these idiots again, everything now in writing

 

PS the pre-court division is just a scare tactic used by these morons

 

 

Thanks cerberusalert, thanks PGH, Will send of the request with £1 today, Do I need to send it Moorcroft or Studio Cards?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought.

 

When I started using Studio cards, I never signed anything. I placed a first order with them over the phone for 2 childrens bikes, total £110.00. My credit limit i was told was £100 so i would need to make payment of £10, for the order to go through. Which i did. The first and last order ever to studio, so how i ove £313.85 is anybodies guess.

 

 

So why would they need my signiture to compare with Studios files. Sound fishy too me, like they would almost be delighted to get my signiture for there unconditional use. Not making any allegations here though :wink:

 

 

 

 

 

 

--------

I do have a debt with Studio Cards, but it is no where near £300+.

I got 2 bikes last christmas totalling £110.00. £10 paid by debit card so £100 outstanding thats all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

to moorcroft.

 

and welcome to cag:)

 

SAM

 

Hi SAM, thanks for the welcome.

 

I have been reading this forum for a few days now. I am getting a huge adrenalin rush by trying to fight back with these Debt Collection people. IS THAT WRONG???

 

I has one the other day from RED, for a £1000+ debt to HSBC in 1999, After reading these forums and subsiquently infroming RED that this debt is surely Statute Bared, the agreed and closed my file, also sending written confirmation that it is now closed. The feeling I got after that was jubilation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SAM, thanks for the welcome.

 

I have been reading this forum for a few days now. I am getting a huge adrenalin rush by trying to fight back with these Debt Collection people. IS THAT WRONG???

NO ITS HEALTHY.:lol:

I has one the other day from RED, for a £1000+ debt to HSBC in 1999, After reading these forums and subsiquently infroming RED that this debt is surely Statute Bared, the agreed and closed my file, also sending written confirmation that it is now closed. The feeling I got after that was jubilation.

 

am jubilant too knowing the losers have lost out again:-D

 

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'm glad to hear you're fighting back. Firstly a CCA request is useless as you have not signed anything, you agreed to the t&c's verbally over the phone (which according to several law websites I have looked, is as legally binding as a written contract). The amount owing may have increased as you have not made the agreed payments to Studio, so they will of course, have been adding a late/non payment charge every month, plus interest on your original balance, so depending how long it has been since you last made a payment, then the balance could be correct. Your best bet is to tell Moorcroft you need a statement of your account issuing, so you can see how the balance has accrued.

 

I would disagree with everyone who states not to speak to them on the phone. They have just credited one of my accounts due to their inept staff giving me endless amounts of false/misleading info on the phone, which would not have happened if I had done everything in writing. So for me it worked out great cos I've ended up having a balance I owe credited, cos I spoke to their staff and they lied to me :D

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'm glad to hear you're fighting back. Firstly a CCA request is useless as you have not signed anything, you agreed to the t&c's verbally over the phone (which according to several law websites I have looked, you ask for a cca to see the agreement, if these firms want to act on a verbal agreement that is their lookout no signed agreement no enorceable debt:mad: is as legally binding as a written contract). The amount owing may have increased as you have not made the agreed payments to Studio, so they will of course, have been adding a late/non payment charge every month, plus interest on your original balance, so depending how long it has been since you last made a payment, then the balance could be correct. Your best bet is to tell Moorcroft you need a statement of your account issuing, so you can see how the balance has accrued. rubbish you send a sar to the original creditor

 

I would disagree with everyone who states not to speak to them on the phone. They have just credited one of my accounts due to their inept staff giving me endless amounts of false/misleading info on the phone, which would not have happened if I had done everything in writing. So for me it worked out great cos I've ended up having a balance I owe credited, cos I spoke to their staff and they lied to me :D

 

and by writing they cant lie to you so you win anyway

 

Hope this helps.

 

PGH:mad:

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send a cca request.

 

The OFT have told me that even if i did apply for the account over the phone they should not hve extended me the credit without a credit agreement. There fault they wont have one Studio never do in my opinion based on the threads i have read on here and on my own experiances.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To say that no signed agreement means it isn't enforceable, is like saying utility companies can't pursue you either, as you don't have any signed agreement with them, it's only verbal, yet we all still pay them without any signed agreement!

 

Sending a SAR costs you, requesting a statement of account from Moorcroft is free.

 

The way round this is to check to see if you received confirmation of the agreement you made over the phone with them, as I have checked and under Distance Selling Regulations (which covers agreements made over the phone) you should have been provided with 'pre-contract' information in writing. If they haven't provided you with that it might be worth checking if the agreement is enforceable or not, if you never received confirmation of you 'contract'.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To say that no signed agreement means it isn't enforceable, is like saying utility companies can't pursue you either, as you don't have any signed agreement with them, it's only verbal, yet we all still pay them without any signed agreement!

That's a totally different kettle of fish, utilities are not covered by the CCA 1974.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am aware of that and it is a radiculous notion, as is stating no signed agreement means unenforceable debt! but requesting a CCA from a company you made a verbal agreement with is a waste of time. Why does everyone instantly advise to do a CCA request or SAR no matter what the query is?

 

The best option for him is to check if he received the documents as outlined in the Distance Selling Regulations and tell Moorcroft to send him a statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you know you have never signed anything for Studio cards so they won't be able to provide you with an enforceable CCA, but what they will do is send you a blank CCA form back...probably with your name & address filled in by them & a letter stating that they have fullfilled your request by providing a 'true copy'. Don't worry, it won't be worth the paper it's written on. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am aware of that and it is a radiculous notion, as is stating no signed agreement means unenforceable debt! but requesting a CCA from a company you made a verbal agreement with is a waste of time. Why does everyone instantly advise to do a CCA request or SAR no matter what the query is?

 

The best option for him is to check if he received the documents as outlined in the Distance Selling Regulations and tell Moorcroft to send him a statement.

 

I hate to say this but some of your comments a way off base and are more aligned to a dca employee.

 

The reason we say go for a cca is to get the OC and the dCA to prove an agreement as stated in the credit agreement act exists, if these companies are too stupid to offer credit without the proper paperwork then that is their lookout.

 

we do NOT advocate debt avoidance what we offer is advice on HOW to PROVE the debt actually came about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...