Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because therte was still £69 owing, so I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle.   However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account 106985089 has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, so I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
    • they have 6mts else it dies. ................. BUT yet again today you've posted on someone else's thread posts now moved here. please keep to your OWN THREAD!! now to date you've not bothered to reply to our questions so we CAN help you.    
    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4218 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I thought there was some guidance or regs which stated they cannot ask you to borrow more or use credit cards?

 

The DCAs letter has a logo of visa etc cards and then states below pay using debit or credit card.

 

Any further clarification or assistance on this as I am hoping to formulate a letter on this alone to them and to OFT if my assumptions are right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 466
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I thought there was some guidance or regs which stated they cannot ask you to borrow more or use credit cards?

 

The DCAs letter has a logo of visa etc cards and then states below pay using debit or credit card.

 

Any further clarification or assistance on this as I am hoping to formulate a letter on this alone to them and to OFT if my assumptions are right?

 

I have a secured loan and when I had payment difficulties I phoned up and was asked if I could use a credit card, I was a bit gobsmacked by this and told him firmly 'no'. I thought there was OFT guidance against this but unsure where so Id be interested in any answers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a secured loan and when I had payment difficulties I phoned up and was asked if I could use a credit card, I was a bit gobsmacked by this and told him firmly 'no'. I thought there was OFT guidance against this but unsure where so Id be interested in any answers.

 

I have had the same, it just shows what a shower of crooks every one of them is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you one and all.. that's the one I was looking for. :)

 

Now I could do following if I am right:

 

1. wait 18 months for FOS to do nothing really

2. Contact OFT to log my 'concerns' (they do not deal with complaints between parties.. )

 

or nothing else I guess?

 

Have now emailed OFT with a complaint referring to cerburaselert's reference.

 

Thanks

 

x

Edited by willtheywontthey
Link to post
Share on other sites

I use OFT not trading standards as we are rural so they all know somebody you know ie gossip. Same with post offices - I keep having to sue different ones for my special deliveries as I am paranoid that the new systems they have state name of company X as being X Ltd debt collectors. Added to that I am sure my postman knows more about my finances than I do because of these postcards!!

 

If I use Consumer Direct they then contact TS to contact me which i do not want as they are local! (and useless)

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFT definately, it's further borrowing.

 

not sure that asking you to pay by credit or debit card is classed as encouraging you to further borrowing

 

inviting or encouraging you to take out a new loan to pay off an existing once is really what is meant by encouraging further borrowing

 

IMO

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you used a credit card to make a payment it would be covered under an existing limit (agreement) else it would bounce

 

a debit card is no different to cash or a cheque and is a payment from your bank account and again would not be classed as "further borrowing"

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you used a credit card to make a payment it would be covered under an existing limit (agreement) else it would bounce

 

a debit card is no different to cash or a cheque and is a payment from your bank account and again would not be classed as "further borrowing"

Debit card no but credit card is a yes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debit card no but credit card is a yes.

 

sorry i must have mis read the post

 

as i understood it the creditor was showing the debtor the methods of payment that they accept

 

if this is the case (as i assumed) offering someone the opportunity to make a payment by credit card and debit card is NOT offering or encouraging them to take on further credit

 

if however the poster is saying the the creditor was suggesting they take out a new credit card with the purpose of paying off the entire debt then that would be different- but i dont think that that was what the poster was saying!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they ask you to use a credit car to pay them you are in fact borrowing money against a pre defined credit limit. You dont actually have the money but borrow it from a Credit Card company whith which to pay a DCA. IMHO this is borrowing money and is a breach of the OFT Guidelines.

 

Paying by Debit Card is an entirely different matter although I would never give a DCA my Debit card details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they ask you to use a credit car to pay them you are in fact borrowing money against a pre defined credit limit. You dont actually have the money but borrow it from a Credit Card company whith which to pay a DCA. IMHO this is borrowing money and is a breach of the OFT Guidelines.

 

Paying by Debit Card is an entirely different matter although I would never give a DCA my Debit card details.

 

most people using a credit card already have a limit set on the card

 

the OFT specifically refers to encouraging debtors to enter into FURTHER borrowing and there is no evidence presented which suggested that the creditor said " why dont you go out and increase your credit card limit or get another one to make a payment"

 

don't get me wrong i am 100% cagger but i do feel sometimes it earns us no brownie points with the OFT when we try to make complaints (if my reading of the post was correct and there is no other information the poster forgot to mention) over matters which quite frankly are just nonsense- the creditor was IMO merely offering the different ways to pay!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take your point. Consider this

 

You have a credit limit of £1000 on your card. The card is clear. You use the card to pay off a DCA £500. You then owe the card company £ 500 which you must pay back. Therefore you have borrowed money to pay a bill. QED

 

It used to be known as Robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I was in discussion with the OFT about this very issue about 3 years ago but they never gave their final answer as they were quite busy. I may write to them again to get a response.

If you had a debt of say £500 and paid it on a credit card, it will be significantly higher than £500. This is because you pay interest on the credit card which is also usually much higher than if the original debt was a loan. If the original debt had no interest (i.e. was a utility bill) you will now pay interest if paying by credit card.

Also if you only ever pay the minimum amount on your card it compounds the amount you pay and can be quite shocking.

I don't have the email anymore but the OFT said basically because a card is issued under the consumer credit act it is considered borrowing.

Actually I will write again, this has spurred me on to do it.

 

EDIT:Remember a card is not fixed term credit either.

Edited by NitrousOxide
Extra line
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I take your point. Consider this

 

You have a credit limit of £1000 on your card. The card is clear. You use the card to pay off a DCA £500. You then owe the card company £ 500 which you must pay back. Therefore you have borrowed money to pay a bill. QED

 

It used to be known as Robbing Peter to pay Paul.

 

yep i understand that (thats what we have all been doing i suspect) but the oft clearlly refers to

 

FURTHER borrowing

 

and i am sure was originally intended to prevent lenders associated with the OC moving debts on to even more loans and consolidation loans

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you owe nothing on your Credit Card and you use £ 500 of your credit limit that is FURTHER borrowing. At least it was when I went to school.

 

Before you borrowed the money from your credit card you didnt owe anything on your credit card. By using the £ 500 you have in fact borrowed more money. You now owe it to a Credit Card company instead of the DCA. Its no different from going to a friend/parent/lover and asking for the loan of £ 500 to pay off a DCA who is sending threatomatics to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and if you paid it back out of your bank account (becuase you used the card for convenience) before the interest is charged then that is called managing your money!

 

i have learned on this forum that there is a time , having made your point to shut up otherwise a discussion turns into an argument

 

that time has come for me on this thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you owe nothing on your Credit Card and you use £ 500 of your credit limit that is FURTHER borrowing. At least it was when I went to school.

 

Before you borrowed the money from your credit card you didnt owe anything on your credit card. By using the £ 500 you have in fact borrowed more money. You now owe it to a Credit Card company instead of the DCA. Its no different from going to a friend/parent/lover and asking for the loan of £ 500 to pay off a DCA who is sending threatomatics to you.

Plus interest on top.

 

and if you paid it back out of your bank account (becuase you used the card for convenience) before the interest is charged then that is called managing your money!

 

i have learned on this forum that there is a time , having made your point to shut up otherwise a discussion turns into an argument

 

that time has come for me on this thread

It's apples and pears really.

You are correct when reffering to debit cards as it's usually your money from your own bank account (not including overdrafts).

However it is generally accepted that using a credit card is further borrowing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have learned on this forum that there is a time , having made your point to shut up otherwise a discussion turns into an argument

 

that time has come for me on this thread

 

You are a sensitive soul. I have no desire to get into an argument with you. You have given your view. I have given mine with my reasons. I happen to think I am right and you obviously think you are correct. Who knows.

 

It seems strange though that some DCAs have actually removed Credit Cards from their lists of acceptable payments yet have left debit cards and prepaid credit cards

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are a sensitive soul. I have no desire to get into an argument with you. You have given your view. I have given mine with my reasons. I happen to think I am right and you obviously think you are correct. Who knows.

 

It seems strange though that some DCAs have actually removed Credit Cards from their lists of acceptable payments yet have left debit cards and prepaid credit cards

 

no not at all sensitive - just that i want friends on here ( i might need you someday) i had a belly full of rancour with the mr ton thingy and would prefer not to get bogged down in that sort of thread again

 

no offence

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...