Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car was dangerous to drive after Vauxhall garage service


Mozambezi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5376 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I'm looking for advice how to deal with Vauxhall Dealership. No names to dispute yet.

 

Fault Description.

1. Car has thick black smoke coming out.

2. Steering wheel jumps and car feels unstable on speeds over 60 mph.

 

Now interesting part:

 

Day 1

 

Fault 1.

 

Engineer found /computer code/ fault on oil pump - pump is weak and needs replacing

 

Engineer advised to do premium service /pervious was done 1000 miles ago/

 

I approved jobs for £480

 

Day 2

 

On collection day by the phone I've been told - here is EML on and investigation required. Car to be collected on next day

 

Day 3

 

Service said - job completed, car has significantly reduced smoke

 

I collected car at 17.00 / end of the day/. Car kept smoking same - my wife saw that, but I was told - it is because engine is cold. I left service

 

Day 4 /next day/

 

I had a 200 miles job trip. On the motorway I found Fault 2 dangerously affecting drive, so had to travel 50 mph to Kwik Fit where guys found no balances on front wheels and tracking wasn't right. So KwikFit engineers done the job and driving was OK.

 

In same time, on my way to KwikFit the car was badly blowing black smoke, so Highway Police stopped me /I had a passenger/. After short chat about - I'm going to the service, they let me go. On 60 -th mile from Dealership EML light went on.

 

Day 5

 

I returned car to Vauxhall. Now I was told - here is a fault code with

Manifold Swirl Flaps /sized/ and it was like that for ages!!!

 

All glow plugs needs replacing, because one of them isn't working. And here is no guarantee, that service wouldn't damage engine block. It means I can ended up with engine replacement

 

Both faults are affecting black smoke And MAYBE after NEW manifold replacement engine will work fine.... agreed price £780 Scheduled for Day 6

 

Day 6

 

Service rang to ask about am I going ahead with £780 job... Parts weren’t ordered.

 

I went to dealer and find out

 

a. Wheels weren't looked after

b. No messages about EML and why collection was rescheduled from Day 2 to Day 3

c. Oil vacuum pump had leaking seal /it means it was possible to replace seal/

d. Manifold was sized before and it is possible to make swirl flaps moving, but not recommended and dealer wouldn't do this.

5. Manifold replacement wouldn't guarantee, that smoke gone

6. They checked EGR and Air flow mass sensor - OK

7. Here were NO error codes on TECH2 on Day 3 - /looks like somebody cleared flash/

 

Now questions.

 

a. I believe, that fault 2 caused damage to Steering column - Dealership says everything is fine... car is old.

 

b. Premium service wasn't necessary thing to do offered refund £116

 

c. Glow plugs are not affecting smoke problem and one plug could be replaced for £45

 

d. Car of the road for 2 weeks now and here is no courtesy car for me... so I’m losing time/ money on travel.

 

 

Questions:

 

What actions can I do against dealership?

 

Is it worth to claim full refund through small claims court?

 

Does somebody know solicitor?

 

 

Kind Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wheel balancing and tracking aren't part of a service unless it is in the Vauxhall service schedule for the service you had.

 

If you took it to the dealer with a complaint of black smoke (excess of diesel) and a wheel wobble, why have a service done just 1000 miles after the last one.

 

What oil pump are you talking about?

 

Changing the manifold (just part of the exhaust) will not stop black (or any coloured) smoke.

 

What actually did you say to the receptionist when you first went to the garage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

a. Oil vacuum pump been changed

b. Tracking and balancing check were on garage job list /I asked to do/

c. Air intake manifold do has swirl flap air supply valves. Usually they gone, when EGR /exhaust return valve/ broken

d. I contacted garage on 16.07.09 and 17.07.09 when job should be completed and didn't get an ansewer where is my vehicle and what is happening with it.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Zaza

Link to post
Share on other sites

a. Oil vacuum pump been changed

b. Tracking and balancing check were on garage job list /I asked to do/

c. Air intake manifold do has swirl flap air supply valves. Usually they gone, when EGR /exhaust return valve/ broken

d. I contacted garage on 16.07.09 and 17.07.09 when job should be completed and didn't get an ansewer where is my vehicle and what is happening with it.

e. In first time, receptionis told me that all jobs are completed and here are no problems with the car. In time being he changed versions of events. Later I went with graduate mechanic to talk with dealer.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Zaza

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry mozambeze, I'm not sure what the 'oil vacuum pump' is.

 

What car is it?

 

Could do with better descriptions as I assumed you were talking about the exhaust manifold not the inlet manifold.

And I don't know what they mean by 'no guarantee service wont damage the block'.

 

Changing the manifold 'might' help is of no use to anyone, you need a correct diagnonis.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Car is Astra Vauxhall 2.0 Di 1999 reg. plate engine Nr. X20DTL

 

This engine has turbine, what pushes air through air intake manifold. In this manifold fresh air is getting mixed with particialy burned fuel from exhaust part. If burning process in engine isn't going well and here is lack of air in engine, then black smoke goes from eshaust.

 

Because part of exhaust gases pases Eghaust Recirculation Valve /EGR/

diesel burning products are setteling down on EGR valve itself and on air intake manifold valves too. If car hasn't been cleaned properly on periodical service time, black particles could block EGR and Air intake manifold swirl flaps. In result of it black smoke comes out.

 

I've been told, that fresh air starving in engine is because turbo unit not working right. Engineer guessed, that oil pump, that supplyes turbine bearings is not good enough, his description - pump was weak, but working. After replaceing pump problem still existing.

 

Then another engineer had look on engine and found, that air flow restriction is in Air intake sized manifold flaps.

 

Their excuse was, that first time here was no fault on fault detection computer.

 

Another engineer, from Vauxhall, wrote me

 

The smoking could well have been the swirl flaps, it's a pretty common issue with those lumps and to be honest any mechanic could have checked the problem in less than 5 minutes. Typical of dealserships with "technicians" who rely on Tech2 to diagnose faults when 2 minutes looking under the bonnet would have shown the fault.

 

Tech2 - is a computer program, helping detect electronical faults. Problem was, that technician relyed on program only and haven't had a look on part.

 

In result I had to pay twice for same job.

 

In fixing process, Dealer found, that engine glow blug needs replacing. And told me that they can try to replace, but sometimes Glow plugs snapping off... and here is no guarantee that this tink wouldn't happend.

 

So engineer broke glow plug on the car and charged me TWICE a. for replacement costs by himself - £44 per one + b. £138 for broken plug extraction... when agreed price was only £44.

 

Today, they rang to me to ask if I could TEST THE CAR ON MOTORWAY on high miles????? Does it mean that Dealer isn't sure about did he fixed fault???

Each MOT sttio has particle meter.. So dealer could use it before and after manifold replacement to check is it better now or not. I thought that engineering is about mesuaring, but not guessing.!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - thanks for that. Does it smoke when it is just sitting there ticking over or at the traffic lights????

 

We call it a 'Turbo' not a turbine.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

When engine on idle, ticking over on lights... everything is OK. Any changes in engine revs causing black smoke /not enough air in/.

Dealer told me, what here is no black smoke, as soon they replaced Airintake manifold and cleaned EGR.... Anyway Airintakes could be cleaned to it wasn't necessary put new £500 part in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got any written bills from them? Can you scan them and put them up here please. Take off you name and address if it is on there before you put it up here.

 

I take it English isn't your first language and they may be getting a bit confused. If you can put the bill up then we can see what work they have done, the parts they have replaced and what they have charged you for.

 

Black smoke doesn't mean there is not enough air, it means there is too much fuel which can be caused by not enough air, but you would notice that in the lack of performance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, you are right all around.

 

I hope to get all bills on Monday. If it possible, I would like to email them personaly. If you don't mind, could you live me your email in PM box, please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

weeks passed as car in the VX garage.

Engineer found, what 3 glow plugs were replaced before... recently.

What about broken one? smile.gif

 

Also guys have problem to establish compression.... Because for 3 days manometer to check ratio isn't working.

Car is travelling now in another garage to check ratio /VX dealing, not me/.

Edited by Mozambezi
adding info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well....

 

Looks like VX garage found underlying problem - Air Mass Flow sensor /I've been told previously, that sensor was OK/

 

When fixing this fault, car developed ANOTHER problem - radiator fan control unit blew up...

 

Car still in the garage... Total bill raises £1500

 

Also few days ago VX Customer Services contacted me - car is ready. When I arrived in the garage... I've been told car was not ready.

 

I'm almost 1 month out of the road.

 

Insurance losses - £90, car tax £20, commuting - £80 extra....

 

No paperwork, no faulty spares no nothing...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...