Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HELP - Bus Lane Penalty - Bailiffs charges - Unbelievable!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, -

 

**** - Just checked when the warrant was given to collect services - 2/4/09 ( more than 180 days )

 

I received a letter from Collect Services Limited dated the 9th April 2009 regarding an unpaid penalty charge. This amount was for £107.88

 

I had been away when it arrived and replied to them and Council on the 21st April 2009 disputing the charge.

 

Letter arrived dated 27th April 2009 from Council saying that it is in the hands of the bailiff. !!!!

 

Letter arrived dated the 29th April 2009 from Collect Services demanding £241.87 !!!!

 

I sent letter dated 7th May 2009 both to Council and Collect Services still disputing the penalty charge.

 

Letter arrived dated 8th May 2009 demanding £308.57 from Collect Services.!!!!

 

Letter arrived dated 13th May 2009 confirming receipt on my letter dated 11th May 2009 would still continue unless instructed by their client.

 

Letter arrived dated 20th May 2009 warning of intended seizure of vehicle!!!!

 

I sent letter dated 23th May 2009 still disputing this charge.

 

Letter dated 10th June 2009 demanding £378.72 from Collect Services.!!!!!

 

11th June I speak to Council who state that they cannot do anything and I should contact the CAB office.

As luck would have it I manage to get through to the CAB office who simply advised me to pay it!!!!!!!

 

18th June - MP sends letter to council

 

12th July - Receive letter from Collect Services now demanding payment

 

12th July - Council have no record of letter from MP so I copy it and hand it in person.

 

13th July - Council as per before say they cannot do anything.!!!! Must seek legal advice

 

 

I am disputing this charge and CAB and Council are telling me just to pay the £378.72!!!!!

 

I have not received any letters from Council regarding the charge. I am certainly not willing to pay Collect Services £378.72

 

QUESTION - Can I instruct Collect Services to return warrant to council as it has passed it's 180 days? If so, who should I send letter to?

 

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ohmygod what a mess...... I am in a similar position, however, I am yet to recieve a reponse with regards to my dispute.... Only thing you can do is continue to write to both the council and Collect services in trying to get them to provide evidence that they sent you penalty notices, (Make sure you send letters recorded delivery though)I would be inclined to pay nothing to collect services, as, as you are aware you are paying any charges/fees added by collect services..... Not really sure how you would proceed in terms of legal process etc so will alert one of the site team to help you out....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, ambershadow,

 

no, only details I started to receive were from Collect services. That's when I contact council & collect services straight away.

 

The only thing I can see that is going to work is the fact that the warrant seems to be over 180 days, but I need a contact name of their contract manager to be able to get the fine back to the council.

 

 

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, seems that the warrant was sent to Collect Services 2/4/09 and according to a 'contract' if the warrant exceeds 180 days then they should send it back to the council.

 

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, seems that the warrant was sent to Collect Services 2/4/09 and according to a 'contract' if the warrant exceeds 180 days then they should send it back to the council.

 

Kind regards

 

Hi

Please could you give further advise on his 'contract' where it refers to the Bailiff's only having 180 days to collect on this type of warrant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This is what I'm trying to find out. The contract is between the council & collect services.

 

I certainly do not want these people to come back to my door and scare my family half to death.

 

If no-one can help/advise, then my next course of action will be to take it to the papers.

 

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to Tomtubby - ( although it doesn't help me in my case )

 

Copy of thread "

I should have made it clear that the 180 day limit in which to execute a Distress Warrant is only applicable to MAGISTRATE COURT FINES that are under contract with Marston Group and Philips Ltd.

 

The Contracts expire in 2 months and new companies could also be awarded some of this work. Watch this space !!!"

 

 

What can I do regarding my situation with Collect Services and the penalty charge????

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't seem to have understood the enforcement process which is here....

 

Parking and Traffic Appeals Service - Bus lane enforcement

 

If you fail to carry out the correct legal process you will end up worse off, just refusing to pay and writing to your MP is pointless. It seems unlikely that the PCN, Enforcement notice, Charge certificate etc all got lost in the post you need to check the address they got sent to and contact the TEC asap. You previously asked for advice a month ago and stated you would complete the Statatury declaration but instead you seem to have decided to write to your MP so its not really surprising nothing has changed except the costs have increased.

Edited by green_and_mean
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, many thanks for the response. I understand but I still cannot recall seeing any letters regarding the PCN hence all the correspondance both to council and Collect Services.

I will of course be contacting the PO regarding the missing letters - but the bailiff action must be sorted first - I refuse to allow these people to put more stress on my family.

 

Even though car is in my name, my wife could have driven it at the time.

 

What can be done to send the warrant back to the council?

 

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, many thanks for the response. I understand but I still cannot recall seeing any letters regarding the PCN hence all the correspondance both to council and Collect Services.

I will of course be contacting the PO regarding the missing letters - but the bailiff action must be sorted first - I refuse to allow these people to put more stress on my family.

 

Even though car is in my name, my wife could have driven it at the time.

 

What can be done to send the warrant back to the council?

 

Kind regards

 

If you bothered to look at the link I posted it explains what you need to do which is file a statatuary declaration something you were made aware of a month ago. It doesn't matter who was driving the owner is responsible for paying the fine. The baliffs are acting correctly and carrying out their job of recovering the monies owed and will carry on doing so until you take the appropriate action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, many thanks for your kind words - unfortunately that was as a result of an s.172 not this case and it took 4 weeks to get to the SD stage due to BT technical difficulties and I expect how busy people are.

 

I shall complete an out of time PE2 & PE3 form and take it from there.

 

My heart goes out to all those who have to deal with bailiffs for whatever reason -

 

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, many thanks for your kind words - unfortunately that was as a result of an s.172 not this case and it took 4 weeks to get to the SD stage due to BT technical difficulties and I expect how busy people are.

 

I shall complete an out of time PE2 & PE3 form and take it from there.

 

My heart goes out to all those who have to deal with bailiffs for whatever reason -

 

Kind regards

 

Looks like the same case to me???

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/parking-traffic-offences/204020-pcn-bus-lane-collect.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...