challenging the CRA's-have we all missed something?

[FlyboyAgain]

+1 on this. It's been on my mind for a couple of months, now.

[PGH7447]

all you'll get back is prevarication and more crap

 

this needs a proper full scale assault to bring this particular rotten edifice crashing down

 

Agreed but within the prevarication and crap will lurk little gems of info, or they might just fcuk up and make a mistake:)

[kfdh1962]

i have a default, subsequently satisfied, that reaches its 6th birthday in september, it will interesteing to see if they remove it automatically or whether i have to push them to do it

Edited July 22, 2009 by kfdh1962

[lickthewallfatboy]

the decision on stringer that has now passed down to the HOL essentially changes the previous situation, and an employee on maternity leave is now allowed to carry over WTR holiday that she is unable to take due to being on maternity leave

 

 

eh?????

[kfdh1962]

OOOPS... sorry LTWFB, posted on wrong thread!!!!

[danukindebt]

Great thread, 6 years is too long, some people only get 5 years for murder.

 

Hope this takes off and we can take them down, going to need some sort of challenge in court to change things. 3 Years History sounds reasonable though.

[car2403]

Until the ICO gets some balls, they will continue with 6 years, as in his opinion they can.

 

Nothing to do with Law, that, as he can't justify his opinion in a Court, as it's based on industry standards.

 

Problem being, "industry standards" are different throughout the World, so that argument is out of the window.

 

In short, collusion of opinions between the ICO and those lesser Judges who just accept his opinion as given and enforceable, means no justice to those that challenge this.

 

Unless we have a millionaire on our hands, willing to push a test case through - that means bringing a claim and pushing appeals to the limits to establish a decent precedent, as there can be no test case without a case in the first place - this is the system we're stuck with.

 

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, data controllers insist on intimidating those trying to achieve justice with threats of overblown costs should they continue and lose.

[danukindebt]

The fight starts here PLEASE SIGN !!!

 

Petition to: reduce the time Credit reference agencies hold data for to 3 years. | Number10.gov.uk

 

500 signatures to get some recognition, should be easy on here

[FCC]

Signed and subbing

[never-in-doubt]

Signed and subbing

 

ditto - I did sign using my CAG username though! LOL.....

[volvo]

signed

[babybear39]

Signed...

[kfdh1962]

count me in... i've signed

[FlyboyAgain]

Signed.

 

Only 13 signators??

 

Will stick the link on my blog, too.

[bh2362]

signed and subbing.

[lickthewallfatboy]

might be an idea to post this on MSE and other consumer rights forums as well for max exposure

[blueotter]

just signed,its all about awareness.

If people knew about this they'd all be signing the petition.

Remember its all about small steps and don't forget there's a very apathetic public out there.

[maroondevo52]

Signed.

[citizenB]

signed x 2

[mr.ton]

Signed

[lickthewallfatboy]

I put a link on MSE

 

may raise the profile a bit

[mjc007.5]

Signed

[joemay]

Signed only 20 signatures - we need more!!!

[never-in-doubt]

I put a link on MSE

 

may raise the profile a bit

 

Me too - here: Petition to No.10 Downing Street - MoneySavingExpert.com Forums

[twofoot]

Been reading this thread for the last couple of hours and find it very interesting. One point which seems to be as clear as daylight comes to light. CRA record data with consent which is given in a credit agreement. Many of us have letters from lenders terminating the said agreement. Surely this recinds any authority to share info with CRA's. If a contract is cancelled then it's cancelled, all of it including permision to pass info to CRA's.