Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just taken another look through the stuff they sent me in response to the CPR request, the notice of assignment isn't the original , it's on a plain sheet of non letterhead paper, in fact it could have easily been typed up by Overdales, or anybody really.  On the other side of the paper are standard Lowell terms and conditions that are only half on the page. Should this be part of my defence?
    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Clamping removal fee avoidance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5363 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am not the most knowledgeable on this, but thought a little debate on the in's and out's might be fruitful for someone.

 

Clamping companies - I am talking about the parasite type that do pub car parks, private estates etc etc NOT Dvla or police ones.

 

They charge a 'fee for removal' That is all. They don't charge for fitting the clamp. driving back in their van. The drivers lunch or anything else, just removal. SO, if there is no removal to be done there can be no charge.

 

Unless I mistaken there is absloutley no law that prevents you from removing a clamp from your car (again NOT DVLA or police ones) provided you do not damage the clamp.

 

Obviously the only way to remove without causing any damage is with the key, but if you can pick locks (and I can) you can also remove any padlock in about a minute without any damage at all and thus perfectly lawful.

 

The clamp belongs to the clamping company, so where do you stand if you leave the clamp where your car was and drive away. Supposing someone who fancies a souvenier takes the clamp after you leave but before the clamper come back? It isn't your responsibility to secure their property but if you don't and the above happens, they will probably not believe that you did remove the clamp and leave it there.

 

Of course, with the lock undone you could secure it to a lamp post I suppose. Maybe it is your responsibility. Anyone know for sure?

 

Another issue here is that clamps are usually a large flat steel plate. During the fitting of the clamp they put chains around your wishbones, which inevitably will scrach the surface of the wishbones, which in time will rust. Could they be persued for criminal damage for this? What about your BMW M3 Alloy wheels that get scuffed as the clamp slips whilst fitting?

 

So. opening the debate up, who actually knows and who has an opinion on the above. In the case of a £300 charge on another thread of a member, supposing they called out a locksmith who picked the lock. Cost maybe £75, but better than £300.

 

In my opinion and I do stand to be corrected on any of the above, the clamping lowlifes would have no claim against you at all for removing their clamp as long as you secured it nearby and didn't damage it.

 

Of course, I would not be surprised if they claimed it was damaged in which case a criminal damage file could be opened with the police which would almost certainly result in your arrest. Then, the damage to your wishbones. Criminal or acidental?

 

This could run and run. As long as it stays civil, lets have some views.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, lots of good stuff there. Some people like to drop the clamp off at their local nick.

 

A lot of the 'do not damage' aspect is correct, but practically speaking you can destroy the clamp and chances of the police being the slightest bit interested are very slim.

 

You could sue for damage if the clamp scuffed your wheels (you'd have to get them repaired and have a receipt to show actual loss). Chances of getting any money are slight though - many clamping firms collect CCJs for fun.

 

Bottom line is you're left to your own devices usually and main priority is getting the clamp off by any means. If the company isn't SIA licenced though, you need to get the police down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Of course, with the lock undone you could secure it to a lamp post I suppose. Maybe it is your responsibility. Anyone know for sure?

 

Hmm... they might still try and charge you or the lamp post for removal!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The two clamps I have so far had were both removed and left in the car park for the clampers to collect at their leisure.

 

I have no knowledge of how those clamps then found their way to the bottom of the canal.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

when ya take it off it becomes lost property,you should take it in to the nearest police station and say you found it near your car!:D

 

Failinig that, you could always through it in the local river along with the shopping trolleys :D:D:D

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

when ya take it off it becomes lost property,you should take it in to the nearest police station and say you found it near your car!:D

 

You are totally correct

 

When I removed them they certainly did become LOST property.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest lipupfatty

imo if you get clamped once then it is unfortunate, if you keep on getting clamped then its purely your own fault through lack of respect for other peoples property or being totally inconsiderate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

imo if you get clamped once then it is unfortunate, if you keep on getting clamped then its purely your own fault through lack of respect for other peoples property or being totally inconsiderate.

 

 

Had I parked illegally, or if they had complied with the relevent laws on clamping then maybe your opinion would be valid, but since I was parked in car park, within a marked bay and my only lack of respect was to leave the retail park to go to an ATM whilst my partner continued to shop there I hardly see that as a justified clamping.

 

Maybe you should get all the facts first before adopting a holier than thou stance

 

Mossy

Edited by Mossycat
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest lipupfatty

in your first post you have not outlined the inccident in relation to you getting clamped, my post was more in response to mossy cat, so im sorry if offended you. ive just taken on a pub three months ago and we have severe parking problems,

Link to post
Share on other sites

in your first post you have not outlined the inccident in relation to you getting clamped, my post was more in response to mossy cat, so im sorry if offended you. ive just taken on a pub three months ago and we have severe parking problems,
Then I would suggest that you invest appropriately in the running of the parking facilities that you offer, and in a manner that is fully concordant with current statute and legislation. It is, after all, one of the costs of doing business.
Link to post
Share on other sites

in your first post you have not outlined the inccident in relation to you getting clamped, my post was more in response to mossy cat, so im sorry if offended you. ive just taken on a pub three months ago and we have severe parking problems,

 

No problem with clamping, but how many 'fair' clampers do you see?

 

Clear signs, clamp release fee of £10. Job done.

 

Except there's no money in doing that is there? Try finding a clamping firm who will be willing to 'solve' your parking problem and release people for a tenner...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest lipupfatty
Then I would suggest that you invest appropriately in the running of the parking facilities that you offer, and in a manner that is fully concordant with current statute and legislation. It is, after all, one of the costs of doing business.

 

such as displaying 6 large signs in the car park asking people to not park unless using the pub, polite notices and warning notices, also displaying 2 large notice on the entrance to the car park, putting polite notices on vehicles that park and not use facilities (same vehicles over and over again)approach said people and asking them not to park if not using the pub, outcome of conversation can end up staff, my wife and myself getting abuse:mad::mad:, there is no current statute and legislation unless one has been pushed through in the last 24hrs that i do not know about, hence the consultation document for vehicle imobilisation, why should i have to foot a bill for people parking inconsiderately on my land just because its close to the centre of town and they can avoid paying a parking charge?:confused:

WHAT WOULD YOU DO?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's not make the mistake of personalising this too much.

 

If the cost of having a car park is too much, then get rid of the car park.

 

If you feel that provision of a car park is of benefit to your business, then perhaps you need to do some proper analysis of the costs of having a car park, and of the various options available to you to keep it for patrons of your business only.

 

The most obvious solution would be a barrier, with parking being validated for customers. Non customers could be charged accordingly.

 

As you mention, it's in the city centre, so there's no reason why the cost of a barrier could not be recouped from charges to non customers, and from the additional revenue that is brought to your tills from paying customers.

 

For this little bit of consultation - No fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

or go on an approved clamping course buy a clamp and a clapped out car out of auctio, put up a big clamping notice then leave the clapped out banger clamped in a promonent position in the car park :) theres a deterant.

 

please note im not advocating clamping someone elses car

 

p.s. would you say i would be better going with a 9 peice set of lockpicks for £3.70 or a manual pick gun with a 5 peice set for £10

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

or go on an approved clamping course buy a clamp and a clapped out car out of auctio, put up a big clamping notice then leave the clapped out banger clamped in a promonent position in the car park :) theres a deterant.

 

 

Our school car park had problems with employees from a local business parking. Our school manager got a clamp, put up clamping notices and then parked his own car prominently and clamped it.

 

Worked a treat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest lipupfatty

A barrier would put off passing trade, plus the cost of purchasing and installation and who would operate it? clamping a car as a decoy for want of a better phrase imo would scare everyone off, resulting in poor trade. Putting in a pay and display machine could be the solution, and if people dont pay i could issue invoices:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a local teenager and give them a job that costs you nothing. All they do is sit on a chair near the entrance and charge the car park fee of £10. All genuine customers who pop in the pub for a drink get the £10 credited towards drinks (so they must spend £10!) for those that don't use the pub, it costs them £10 which your helper keeps. He wins, you win, your real customers win.

 

Seems like a potentially viable solution and nobody needs get the hump. of course, if nobody but customers use the car park thenm, the teenager doesn't earn which seems unfair, so they get a guaranteed wage of some sort. You would have to iron out the details. CCTV pointing straight at the car park is a must otherwise your honest teenage may be tempted to let people park for £5 instead!

Edited by wheelergeezer
Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a local teenager and give them a job that costs you nothing. All they do is sit on a chair near the entrance and charge the car park fee of £5. All genuine customers who pop in the pub for a drink get the £10 credited towards drinks (so they must spend £10!) for those that don't use the pub, it costs them £10 which your helper keeps. He wins, you win, your real customers win.

 

 

Sounds like a great idea I pay £5 to park and get £10 in drinks.

 

The teenager wins, the customer wins and the pub loses.

 

You should work for a bank

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...